# Is Shodan more retarded lately, or has he maintained a consistent level of retardation all along?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [January 24, 2012, 8:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530 "2012-01-24T20:31:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 47

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 1:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/921 "2012-02-08T13:45:13Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Shut up, you fucking troll.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

It’s like the Magic 8-Ball of Idiocy, isn’t it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 1:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/922 "2012-02-08T13:45:28Z")

</div>

I said, “Elaborate.”

You respond, as though I have issued some sort of rude command:

> [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](#):
>
> Wow, a command to elaborate from **Bricker**. However shall I respond to this impressive yet entirely respectful imperative?

And RTF supports the narrative:

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> [Anguished wail]
> 
> Oh, the hoops you conservatives make us poor libruls jump through!

But I didn’t just say, “Elaborate,” out of the blue. It was in direct response to you:

> [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](#):
>
> Is that understandable, or shall I elaborate?

Surely it’s not rude to answer that statement with “Elaborate,” and not be considered overly authoritarian?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 2:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/923 "2012-02-08T14:13:51Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> And RTF supports the narrative:  
> But I didn’t just say, “Elaborate,” out of the blue.

That’s nice, sweetie, but I was responding to YOUR narrative, which was that requests by liberals like me to provide dates in a discussion where the timeline was at issue were unreasonable. The same was true of that ‘Guns in Bars’ thread that you said demonstrated the equivalence of liberals to climate deniers: your claim that liberals wouldn’t acknowledge the validity of your data wasn’t backed by any basics like “how many people who had been arguing pro-gun-control in the thread rejoined the thread when you bumped it after a year and a half?” You know, data that might’ve given some sort of clue as to what the maximum number of people might’ve been around to say, “Oh, **Bricker** , we were so wrong 18 months ago, and we repent in sackcloth and ashes.”

Hell, I’ve come up with my own count - after your request at post 142, of all the pro-gun-control types remaining in the thread, 1 out of 1 did what you said they should.

You’re free at any time to come up with an alternative measure, and I suggested one earlier, before I realized you were talking specifically about post 142, rather than post 100 where you bumped the thread. But ISTM that if YOU are claiming that thread as evidence for something, you’d better come up with a count of your own, because right now, mine is by default the authoritative summary of how we libruls behaved that thread. And all it says is: you won’t take ‘yes’ for an answer, but you rather invent hordes of librul lurkers who should have suddenly de-lurked after post 142, and your entire argument is built around these ghostly presences.

What did you do - read a self-help book about “How Ectoplasm can be on your side”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 2:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/924 "2012-02-08T14:17:56Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> It’s like the Magic 8-Ball of Idiocy, isn’t it?

Yup - if you get lucky when you shake him, you might get “Reply Hazy - Troll Again Later.” 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 2:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/925 "2012-02-08T14:21:06Z")

</div>

Oh, and [a little present](http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201202070016) for all those conservatives who think the problem is liberal incivility.

If you want to keep the ‘both sides are doing the same shit’ bullshit meme alive, try to match the link.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xenophon41](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xenophon41/32/253_2.png) [@xenophon41](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/xenophon41)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/926 "2012-02-08T14:25:40Z")

</div>

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> Oh, and [a little present](http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201202070016) for all those conservatives who think the problem is liberal incivility.

What? That was just an _analogy_, Rufus.

Man, bleeding heart commie anti American librul pussies are so sensitive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_DiFool](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_difool/32/19543_2.png) [@John\_DiFool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_DiFool)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 2:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/927 "2012-02-08T14:33:43Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> It’s like the Magic 8-Ball of Idiocy, isn’t it?

Signs point to yes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zeriel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/58956e/32.png) [@Zeriel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zeriel)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 2:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/928 "2012-02-08T14:49:20Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> It is more amusing for me to mix substance and snark.

Really? You should try it more often then, instead of just shitting up the place.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hentor_the_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 3:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/929 "2012-02-08T15:56:11Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> I said, “Elaborate.”
> 
> You respond, as though I have issued some sort of rude command:
> 
> And RTF supports the narrative:
> 
> But I didn’t just say, “Elaborate,” out of the blue. It was in direct response to you:
> 
> Surely it’s not rude to answer that statement with “Elaborate,” and not be considered overly authoritarian?

My mother taught me that the way to respond would be to say “Please elaborate.” That’s my narrative.

In the context of your selective non-responding to key elements, it comes across even less like a real desire for an honest exchange. For instance, you’ve not yet indicated what the rate of gun crimes in bars in Virginia was in the year 2008-2009, nor between 2011-present.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 4:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/930 "2012-02-08T16:07:03Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> It is more amusing for me to mix substance and snark. [/list]

What do you estimate your substance/snark ratio to be?

In your recent postings regarding the Halperin memo at ABC, you’re proving everyone’s preconceptions of you. Your MO seems to be make shit up and then put your fingers in your ears shouting “la la la I win!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VinylTurnip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b2d939/32.png) [@VinylTurnip](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VinylTurnip)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 4:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/931 "2012-02-08T16:44:02Z")

</div>

> [@Zeriel](#):
>
> Really? You should try it more often then, instead of just shitting up the place.

If he were a liberal, nobody would complain about his shitting up the place. He could shit himself a maze of 40-foot walls and everybody would dance and shout “hosanna” and throw flowers. It’s only because he’s a conservative that his shit stinks.

Hey, these unsupported Dertrihsian proclamations \*are \*kinda fun! Now I see why you like them, **Shody**!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lobohan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobohan/32/79_2.png) [@Lobohan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobohan)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/932 "2012-02-08T16:58:38Z")

</div>

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> What do you estimate your substance/snark ratio to be?

He’s at homeopathic levels.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 5:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/933 "2012-02-08T17:24:36Z")

</div>

> [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](#):
>
> My mother taught me that the way to respond would be to say “Please elaborate.” That’s my narrative.
> 
> In the context of your selective non-responding to key elements, it comes across even less like a real desire for an honest exchange. For instance, you’ve not yet indicated what the rate of gun crimes in bars in Virginia was in the year 2008-2009, nor between 2011-present.

I answered that (in a sense) by asking why the burden was on me to provide that numbers, when my position in the original debate was rejecting the contention of others that gun crime would increase. How has this transformed into my needing to show that it hasn’t? At the very least, I’ve made a prima facie case. Granted, there could be other factors that I don’t see that could revise this conclusion, but why is it my burden to hunt them down?

To explicitly answer your question: I don’t know. But since the burden of proof isn’t on me, why do I have to do the work to get that answer?

Oh. Sorry.

I meant, “‘Please’ tell me why the burden of proof is on me?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/934 "2012-02-08T17:27:18Z")

</div>

> [@Lobohan](#):
>
> He’s at homeopathic levels.

Well put!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/935 "2012-02-08T17:28:19Z")

</div>

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> Oh, and [a little present](http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201202070016) for all those conservatives who think the problem is liberal incivility.
> 
> If you want to keep the ‘both sides are doing the same shit’ bullshit meme alive, try to match the link.

Keith Olberman to/about George W Bush:

> [@](#):
>
> You’re a fascist! Get them to print you a T-shirt with fascist on it!..You, sir, have no place in a government of the people, by the people, for the people. The lot of you are the symbolic descendants of the despotic middle managers of some banana republic to whom ‘freedom’ is an ironic brand name, a word you reach for when you want to get away with its opposite.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xenophon41](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xenophon41/32/253_2.png) [@xenophon41](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/xenophon41)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 5:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/936 "2012-02-08T17:32:42Z")

</div>

Wow. You are _king_ of the false equivalence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hentor_the_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 5:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/937 "2012-02-08T17:32:54Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> I answered that (in a sense) by asking why the burden was on me to provide that numbers, when my position in the original debate was rejecting the contention of others that gun crime would increase. How has this transformed into my needing to show that it hasn’t? At the very least, I’ve made a prima facie case. Granted, there could be other factors that I don’t see that could revise this conclusion, but why is it my burden to hunt them down?
> 
> To explicitly answer your question: I don’t know. But since the burden of proof isn’t on me, why do I have to do the work to get that answer?
> 
> Oh. Sorry.
> 
> I meant, “‘Please’ tell me why the burden of proof is on me?”

Why did you bring it up in this thread? That should help give you a start at answering your own question.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VinylTurnip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b2d939/32.png) [@VinylTurnip](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VinylTurnip)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 5:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/938 "2012-02-08T17:41:03Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> Keith Olberman to/about George W Bush:

God bless Keith Olbermann, without whom conservatives would be forced to trail off at the end of their “oh yeah? Well what about \_\_\_\_\_\_!” retorts whenever media partisanship/vitriol is being discussed.

(Former winners include Michael Moore in the “political propaganda” category.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 5:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/939 "2012-02-08T17:42:33Z")

</div>

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> That’s nice, sweetie, but I was responding to YOUR narrative, which was that requests by liberals like me to provide dates in a discussion where the timeline was at issue were unreasonable. The same was true of that ‘Guns in Bars’ thread that you said demonstrated the equivalence of liberals to climate deniers: your claim that liberals wouldn’t acknowledge the validity of your data wasn’t backed by any basics like “how many people who had been arguing pro-gun-control in the thread rejoined the thread when you bumped it after a year and a half?” You know, data that might’ve given some sort of clue as to what the maximum number of people might’ve been around to say, “Oh, **Bricker** , we were so wrong 18 months ago, and we repent in sackcloth and ashes.”
> 
> Hell, I’ve come up with my own count - after your request at post 142, of all the pro-gun-control types remaining in the thread, 1 out of 1 did what you said they should.
> 
> You’re free at any time to come up with an alternative measure, and I suggested one earlier, before I realized you were talking specifically about post 142, rather than post 100 where you bumped the thread. But ISTM that if YOU are claiming that thread as evidence for something, you’d better come up with a count of your own, because right now, mine is by default the authoritative summary of how we libruls behaved that thread. And all it says is: you won’t take ‘yes’ for an answer, but you rather invent hordes of librul lurkers who should have suddenly de-lurked after post 142, and your entire argument is built around these ghostly presences.
> 
> What did you do - read a self-help book about “How Ectoplasm can be on your side”?

No. But this is a good tactic on your part: demand evidence, when in my view this is intuitively obvioous.

Tell you what: in July of this year, we’ll have another year of data. I’ll repost the question.

Do you think there will be much change in terms of people willing to admit error after two years of lower numbers?

Or maybe the thread will just sink and die, and in our later discussions you’ll posit that not that many people saw it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2012, 5:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530/940 "2012-02-08T17:44:37Z")

</div>

> [@xenophon41](#):
>
> Wow. You are _king_ of the false equivalence.

Because Bush really was a fascist? Or because “fascist” is ever so much nicer than “pot and coke dealer?” Or because Bolling is a real right wing commentator and Olberman isn’t a real left wing commentator?

I’m baffled how this wasn’t a valid comparison. You tell me.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530.md?page=46)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-shodan-more-retarded-lately-or-has-he-maintained-a-consistent-level-of-retardation-all-along/610530.md?page=48)
