# Is the air around Mt. Chimborazo thinner than the air around Mt. Everest?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-air-around-mt-chimborazo-thinner-than-the-air-around-mt-everest/934158>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [March 3, 2021, 3:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-air-around-mt-chimborazo-thinner-than-the-air-around-mt-everest/934158 "2021-03-03T03:48:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/9de053/32.png) [@Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackknifed_Juggernaut)\
**Post date:** [March 3, 2021, 3:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-air-around-mt-chimborazo-thinner-than-the-air-around-mt-everest/934158/1 "2021-03-03T03:48:26Z")

</div>

On average? I figure that weather might play a part at any given time. My thinking is that, while the earth is fatter around the equator (which is why Chimborazo is further from the Earth’s center than Everest), the atmosphere (being fluid) doesn’t necessarily need to have the same shape. If the atmosphere were more round (perhaps due to gravity having more ability to shape it), then it seems intuitive that a point on land furthest from the center should have the thinnest air surrounding it.

I’m sure someone soon will tell me why I’m wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [March 3, 2021, 4:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-air-around-mt-chimborazo-thinner-than-the-air-around-mt-everest/934158/2 "2021-03-03T04:11:47Z")

</div>

So you’re wrong because 🙂 … the reference is the geoid, the surface of equal effective potential taking into account gravity and rotation. This is the shape that the ocean’s surface would settle out to absent tides and wind, mean sea level. And the geoid bulges at the equator too. And that’s the point from which you start measuring elevation above mean sea level, i.e. other things being equal the air pressure at the same height above the geoid is the same everywhere. It’s determined by gravity+rotation, not determined just by the distance from the center of the earth. At least I think that’s right. If not someone will soon tell me why I’m wrong…

> **[Geoid](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoid)**
>
> Pages for logged out editors learn more
> 
> 			 
> The geoid (/ˈdʒiː.ɔɪd/) is the shape that the ocean surface would take under the influence of the gravity of Earth, including gravitational attraction and Earth's rotation, if other influences such as winds and tides were absent. This surface is extended through the continents (such as with very narrow hypothetical canals). According to Gauss, who first described it, it is the "mathematical figure of the Earth", a smooth but irregular surface wh...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfpup](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolfpup/32/10618_2.png) [@wolfpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfpup)\
**Post date:** [March 3, 2021, 4:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-air-around-mt-chimborazo-thinner-than-the-air-around-mt-everest/934158/3 "2021-03-03T04:51:33Z")

</div>

In general, the top of the troposphere is much higher near the equator and drops as you move north or south toward cooler latitudes. Gravity has very little to do with it. It’s mostly the result of hotter temperatures, as well as updrafts associated with the Intertropical Convergence Zone, where the northern and southern trade winds come together. For that reason, you could expect the air to be much thicker at the top of Mt Chimborazo than at the top of Everest. In fact, this chart of effective “pressure altitude” clearly bears this out (Everest is the bright blue-green line at the very top, Chimborazo is the dark blue line about halfway down).

[![](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0517/2193/files/PhysicalAltitudeVsPressureAltitude_grande.png?972) ](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0517/2193/files/PhysicalAltitudeVsPressureAltitude_grande.png?972)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [March 3, 2021, 5:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-air-around-mt-chimborazo-thinner-than-the-air-around-mt-everest/934158/4 "2021-03-03T05:29:54Z")

</div>

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> Gravity has very little to do with it.

This is not correct. Gravity defines the basic structure. Equal effective potential (gravity + rotation) defines mean sea level, and air pressure drops as you go higher because gravity decreases. The local secondary effects that you describe are superimposed on that basic structure.

The _principal_ reason that Chimichanga has much higher pressures than Everest is simply because its elevation above the geoid (msl) is much lower. That’s the part that OP was missing - measuring elevation above msl is what matters, i.e. measuring effective potential, not distance from the center of the earth.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [March 3, 2021, 5:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-air-around-mt-chimborazo-thinner-than-the-air-around-mt-everest/934158/5 "2021-03-03T05:38:30Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> air pressure drops as you go higher because gravity decreases

I misspoke here. Pressure drops because of the decreasing weight of the column of air above.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [March 3, 2021, 5:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-air-around-mt-chimborazo-thinner-than-the-air-around-mt-everest/934158/6 "2021-03-03T05:50:52Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> Chimichanga

WTF? I don’t know where that came from. Chimborazo.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfpup](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolfpup/32/10618_2.png) [@wolfpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfpup)\
**Post date:** [March 3, 2021, 6:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-air-around-mt-chimborazo-thinner-than-the-air-around-mt-everest/934158/7 "2021-03-03T06:19:37Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> This is not correct. Gravity defines the basic structure.

Sure, that’s trivially obvious, but that isn’t at all what I meant. I meant that the very slightly lower gravity due to being further from the earth’s center, as proposed by the OP, has virtually no influence on the air pressure at Chimborazo. You’re right, though, that although the factors I cited contribute to a much higher tropopause near the equator than closer to the poles, the difference in elevation above MSL is the principal difference accounting for air pressure, plus to some extent temperature and humidity. As one can see from the chart, perceived pressure altitude can differ significantly from physical altitude.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheGunIsMightierThanThePen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thegunismightierthanthepen/32/2981_2.png) [@TheGunIsMightierThanThePen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TheGunIsMightierThanThePen)\
**Post date:** [March 3, 2021, 6:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-air-around-mt-chimborazo-thinner-than-the-air-around-mt-everest/934158/8 "2021-03-03T06:21:38Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> WTF? I don’t know where that came from. Chimborazo.

I hadn’t even noticed it until you pointed it out, but it gave me quite a LOL.

As for the OP, this line from the [Wikipedia article on the equatorial bulge](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equatorial_bulge) neatly summarizes what the others have been saying:

> [@](#):
>
> But since the ocean also bulges, like Earth and its atmosphere, Chimborazo is not as high above sea level as Everest is.

If the atmosphere didn’t bulge along with the land, then billions of years ago when Earth was spinning much faster, the equatorial latitudes would have been exposed to outer space.
