# Is the American flag still on the moon?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [September 12, 2007, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983 "2007-09-12T22:28:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 12:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/21 "2007-09-13T12:52:50Z")

</div>

What would be the resolution if the Hubbell telescope was pointed at the moon? 10m? 1m?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jjimm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba8739/32.png) [@jjimm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jjimm)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 1:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/22 "2007-09-13T13:05:55Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Colophon]  
Cool link, but ugh - wouldn’t you think a “Senior Space Writer” would know the difference between “pouring” and “poring”?  
[/QUOTE]  
Or know how to use apostrophes: “the Moons surface”; “The Ballistic Missile Defense Organizations faster, better, cheaper Clementine probe”; “Apollo 15s lunar module”.

And what the hell is this clumsy bollocks: “during their over three-day stay”?

Sheesh, what a shit piece of writing. Didn’t they have sub-editors back in 2001?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shijinn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/cc9497/32.png) [@shijinn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/shijinn)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 1:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/23 "2007-09-13T13:05:56Z")

</div>

i’m not familiar with telescopes. i know direct light is of course stronger than a reflection but, can anyone elaborate and help me wrap my head around how we can make out galaxies ???000000 light years away and not be able to inspect our moon closely?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 1:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/24 "2007-09-13T13:11:47Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=BobLibDem]  
What would be the resolution if the Hubbell telescope was pointed at the moon? 10m? 1m?  
[/QUOTE]  
About 60 meters, which is why [we can’t view any artifacts from the moon landings](http://hubblesite.org/reference_desk/faq/answer.php.id=77&cat=topten).

> [@](#):
>
> **Can Hubble see the Apollo landing sites on the Moon?**
> 
> No, Hubble cannot take photos of the Apollo landing sites.
> 
> An object on the Moon 4 meters (4.37 yards) across, viewed from HST, would be about 0.002 arcsec in size. The highest resolution instrument currently on HST is the Advanced Camera for Surveys at 0.03 arcsec. So anything we left on the Moon cannot be resolved in any HST image. It would just appear as a dot.
> 
> Here is a picture that Hubble took of the Moon:  
> [http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/1999/14/](http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/1999/14/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 1:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/25 "2007-09-13T13:29:29Z")

</div>

On the other hand, scientists analyzing photos taken by the unmanned Clementine lunar orbiter believe it [captured photographic evidence of the Apollo 15 landing site](http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15_touchdown_photos_010427.html):

> [@](#):
>
> A small dark spot found in the Clementine images is not associated with any fresh crater, but exactly coincides with the Apollo 15 landing site, Kreslavsky told [SPACE.com](http://SPACE.com).
> 
> “This is a result of my processing 52 images taken by the Clementine spacecraft through a red filter, while the spacecraft went over the scene from the southern horizon through zenith to the northern horizon,” Kreslavsky said. A diffuse dark spot can be seen exactly at the landing site, he said.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 1:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/26 "2007-09-13T13:42:40Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=shijinn]  
i’m not familiar with telescopes. i know direct light is of course stronger than a reflection but, can anyone elaborate and help me wrap my head around how we can make out galaxies ???000000 light years away and not be able to inspect our moon closely?  
[/QUOTE]

Perhaps because your average galaxy is much, much larger than the Moon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scotandrsn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a4c791/32.png) [@scotandrsn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scotandrsn)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 1:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/27 "2007-09-13T13:45:39Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Harmonious Discord]  
They send probes to all the planets, and beyond. They land probes on some planets and moons. We have many satellites orbiting the earth. They want to make a moon base, yet nobody sends a satellite to orbit the moon. Wouldn’t it be easier to set up satellites orbiting the moon before all the different countries try to set up a moon base? We should be able to learn stuff from a satellite orbiting the moon, and have great quality pictures of the topography.  
[/QUOTE]

We sent up [Celmentine](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/clementine.html) and [Lunar Prospector](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunarprosp.html) in the 90s, and will send up the [Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=LUNARRO) next October.

[QUOTE=Harmonious Discord]  
Not even a European attempt has been made, and they rub Nasa’s nose in their accomplishments when they can. They are the space agencies of Earth, so you know who they are.  
[/QUOTE]

The ESA sent up [SMART-1](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=2003-043C) in 2003.

[Japan](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=SELENE) launches a mission tomorrow, and [China](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/prop_missions.html#change1) and [India](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=CHANDRYN1) are sending up orbiters within the next year.

They’re way ahead of you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shijinn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/cc9497/32.png) [@shijinn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/shijinn)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 2:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/28 "2007-09-13T14:22:24Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Giles]  
Perhaps because your average galaxy is much, much larger than the Moon.  
[/QUOTE]  
but the moon is also much, much nearer. am i correct to say that we _can_ see the flag if we wanted to; we just didn’t build any telescopes for the purpose?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Contrapuntal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e274bd/32.png) [@Contrapuntal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Contrapuntal)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 2:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/29 "2007-09-13T14:28:13Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Triskadecamus]  
You can see a quarter, well enough to read heads or tails at ten feet, if you see really well. How well do you suppose you would do calling heads or tails for a quarter on the Washington Monument, if you were looking from Miami?

[/QUOTE]  
About fifty/fifty. Pretty good for the naked eye, eh? 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jjimm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba8739/32.png) [@jjimm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jjimm)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 2:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/30 "2007-09-13T14:28:40Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Fear Itself]  
On the other hand, scientists analyzing photos taken by the unmanned Clementine lunar orbiter believe it [captured photographic evidence of the Apollo 15 landing site](http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15_touchdown_photos_010427.html):  
[/QUOTE]  
No, really? As mentioned in post #7 and commented on in posts #18 and #22? Never! 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 2:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/31 "2007-09-13T14:31:26Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=jjimm]  
Sheesh, what a shit piece of writing. Didn’t they have sub-editors back in 2001?  
[/QUOTE]

I’m sorry Dave, I’m afraid I can’t do that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 2:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/32 "2007-09-13T14:33:34Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=shijinn]  
but the moon is also much, much nearer. am i correct to say that we _can_ see the flag if we wanted to; we just didn’t build any telescopes for the purpose?  
[/QUOTE]  
No. Such a telescope would be far beyond the resolving power of any ever built.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 2:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/33 "2007-09-13T14:35:46Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=jjimm]  
No, really? As mentioned in post #7 and commented on in posts #18 and #22? Never! 😉  
[/QUOTE]  
Film at eleven!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 2:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/34 "2007-09-13T14:38:58Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=shijinn]  
i’m not familiar with telescopes. i know direct light is of course stronger than a reflection but, can anyone elaborate and help me wrap my head around how we can make out galaxies ???000000 light years away and not be able to inspect our moon closely?  
[/QUOTE]  
Many celestial sights are actually larger than you’d expect, sometimes a lot larger. They’re just really dim. For illustration, [check out this remarkable image](http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap061228.html) comparing the true size of the Andromeda Galaxy with our Moon, in terms of the amount of sky they take up as viewed from Earth. I don’t know about you, but I found it quite an eye-opener.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b782af/32.png) [@Grey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grey)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 2:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/35 "2007-09-13T14:42:32Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=shijinn]  
i’m not familiar with telescopes. i know direct light is of course stronger than a reflection but, can anyone elaborate and help me wrap my head around how we can make out galaxies ???000000 light years away and not be able to inspect our moon closely?  
[/QUOTE]  
Let’s put it this way. The Andromeda galaxy spans **7** full moon diameters while sitting a whopping 60,000,000 times further away.

Space is big.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 2:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/36 "2007-09-13T14:44:01Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=shijinn]  
but the moon is also much, much nearer. am i correct to say that we _can_ see the flag if we wanted to; we just didn’t build any telescopes for the purpose?  
[/QUOTE]

The flag is roughly a metre or so in size, and is 4 x10^8 metres away.

The galaxy that we are in is about 10^21 metres across. The nearest galaxy roughly the same size is the Andromeda galaxy, which is about 2.5 x 10^22 metres away from us. To quote the Wikipedia article on it,

> [@](#):
>
> It appears quite small without a telescope because only the central part is bright enough to be visible, but the full angular diameter of the galaxy is seven times that of the full moon.

So you can see another galaxy with the naked eye – but that flag is so small that no telescope could be built that could see it. Galaxies are really, really big.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shijinn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/cc9497/32.png) [@shijinn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/shijinn)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 3:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/37 "2007-09-13T15:20:01Z")

</div>

ah… i get the picture now, thanks for the replies. and thanks for the beautiful link, **Cervaise**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Harmonious\_Discord](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/74df32/32.png) [@Harmonious\_Discord](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Harmonious_Discord)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 3:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/38 "2007-09-13T15:39:50Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=scotandrsn]  
We sent up [Celmentine](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/clementine.html) and [Lunar Prospector](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunarprosp.html) in the 90s, and will send up the [Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=LUNARRO) next October.

The ESA sent up [SMART-1](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=2003-043C) in 2003.

[Japan](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=SELENE) launches a mission tomorrow, and [China](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/prop_missions.html#change1) and [India](http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=CHANDRYN1) are sending up orbiters within the next year.

They’re way ahead of you.  
[/QUOTE]

I’m so glad to see something new going up to the moon. It’s been sad that we haven’t sent numerous satellites to analysis the moon better in the last three decades. Going with cheaper in mass quantities could have served us better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OtakuLoki](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ac8455/32.png) [@OtakuLoki](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OtakuLoki)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/39 "2007-09-13T15:54:13Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Harmonious Discord]  
They want to make a moon base, yet nobody sends a satellite to orbit the moon. Wouldn’t it be easier to set up satellites orbiting the moon before all the different countries try to set up a moon base?  
[/QUOTE]

Are you aware just how hard it is to get a stable orbit around the moon? I’m not talking a few weeks, such as for the Apollo missions, but more than a few months. There’s been discussion in NASA in how to accomplish this, since a lunar satellite network is believed to be a good thing for a Moon Base, but trying to find an orbit that’s likely to last more than a few months, without constant correction burns is very difficult. Between the effect of the Earth’s gravity on anything in orbit around the Moon, and the “lumpiness” of the moon’s own gravitational field, moon orbiting satellites just don’t seem to do very well.

IIRC the only orbit they’ve found that has a hope of being long-term stable is something inclined at an angle of 70 degrees to the plane of the moon’s rotation. I’ll try to find a cite for this, but it might take me a while.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2007, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983/40 "2007-09-13T15:55:55Z")

</div>

I have a telescope which could see the flag on the moon.  
You’d just have to get the telescope to the Moon, too, first. Preferably within a mile or so of the landing site.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-american-flag-still-on-the-moon/418983.md?page=3)
