# Is the existence of a Creator just more sensical?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-existence-of-a-creator-just-more-sensical/481867>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 18, 2009, 4:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-existence-of-a-creator-just-more-sensical/481867 "2009-01-18T16:52:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 232

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalD](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/7feea3/32.png) [@CalD](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalD)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2009, 6:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-existence-of-a-creator-just-more-sensical/481867/232 "2009-01-19T06:19:59Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> But that’s not what scientists say. They say “given this mountain of evidence from multiple fields, humans and chimpanzees have a common ancestor.”

Again, I was asked what was the evidence that the Creator exists in a non-physical, timeless state. If my starting assertion is true (matter was created by the creator), then it is a logical inferred conclusion to draw. Responding by disagreeing with the premise is totally missing the point.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-existence-of-a-creator-just-more-sensical/481867)._