Well, now we’re making progress.
Well, of course the government has a right to abrogate it, because the government is the people and therefore cannot act contrary to their will.
I wouldn’t choose to continue living in a place where my career was predicated on my religious belief - and if I had no choice but to do so, then I would either change my beliefs or change my career.
And now you’ve gone back to assuming that “the right to free speech or the right to life” is some objective, cosmically-defined decree, instead of being something that people made up, and demanding that logic itself bend to your personal preferences as to how the world should be.