# Is the pic on the front page of cnn.com a photo shop job?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [February 21, 2005, 2:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100 "2005-02-21T02:22:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dnooman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/839c29/32.png) [@dnooman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dnooman)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 2:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/1 "2005-02-21T02:22:17Z")

</div>

The picture currently on the front page of [www.cnn.com](http://www.cnn.com) shows a picture of Pres. and Mrs. Bush boarding a plane, and it looks really fake. Is it a photo shop job or another kind of fake? Why would they do that if it is a fake?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dnooman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/839c29/32.png) [@dnooman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dnooman)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 2:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/2 "2005-02-21T02:25:13Z")

</div>

I’m not sure how to link to the picture itself, maybe this is it [http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/02/20/bush.europe/index.html](http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/02/20/bush.europe/index.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Blue\_Sky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d26b3c/32.png) [@Mr.Blue\_Sky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Blue_Sky)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 2:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/3 "2005-02-21T02:25:15Z")

</div>

It does look pretty low-grade.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![friedo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/8edcca/32.png) [@friedo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/friedo)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 2:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/4 "2005-02-21T02:26:16Z")

</div>

[Here](http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/WORLD/europe/02/20/bush.europe/top.bush.belgium.2.jpg) is a direct link to the picture for reference.

The angle and lighting do indeed look quite weird. But there are approximately ten billion photographs of the President and First Lady boarding AF1, so I hardly think there would be any need to fake one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Padeye](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/a9a28c/32.png) [@Padeye](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Padeye)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 2:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/5 "2005-02-21T02:27:56Z")

</div>

I doubt that it is and I can see a situation where an undoctored photo would look exactly as this one does. A long telephoto shot with a direct flash that is almost on axis at that distance can give this harsh, flat look that would look equally at home on The Onion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Valgard](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/7feea3/32.png) [@Valgard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Valgard)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 2:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/6 "2005-02-21T02:37:28Z")

</div>

Looks like a normal picture to me, taken at night with an awful lot of light (floodlights and a bright flash perhaps) - I assume that when Air Force One is unloading at an airport the security folks have it pretty well lit up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kozmik](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/8dc957/32.png) [@Kozmik](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kozmik)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 3:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/7 "2005-02-21T03:02:23Z")

</div>

> [@friedo](#):
>
> [Here](http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/WORLD/europe/02/20/bush.europe/top.bush.belgium.2.jpg) is a direct link to the picture for reference.
> 
> The angle and lighting do indeed look quite weird. But there are approximately ten billion photographs of the President and First Lady boarding AF1, so I hardly think there would be any need to fake one.

If you think about there is no motive for faking the photograph. There would be grounds for suspicion if the photo was of, say, Bush and an official from France appearing to reach an agreement on an issue. In any case, we might find out the origin of this photo by comparing it with similar photos of Bush boarding Air Force One, if they exist. Presidential photographers might have an answer and also Presidential libraries.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ringo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/779978/32.png) [@Ringo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ringo)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 3:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/8 "2005-02-21T03:13:59Z")

</div>

I agree that it’s a little odd-looking, but I think **Padeye** ’s right that the cropped look of President and Mrs. Bush is the result of the lighting. And, as has been said, what earthly motivation would there be for faking such a picture?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sigur\_ros](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7993a0/32.png) [@sigur\_ros](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sigur_ros)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 3:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/9 "2005-02-21T03:15:30Z")

</div>

exact same thing occured to me when I first saw it, but why would it be fake?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CynicalGabe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/3e96dc/32.png) [@CynicalGabe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CynicalGabe)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 3:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/10 "2005-02-21T03:56:03Z")

</div>

Theres another thread here somewhere asking the same question.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Blue\_Sky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d26b3c/32.png) [@Mr.Blue\_Sky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Blue_Sky)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 3:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/11 "2005-02-21T03:56:30Z")

</div>

I think I know why it looks fake. The blue in the background is upper half of Air Force One. My brain first thought it was the sky.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Girl\_Next\_Door](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@Girl\_Next\_Door](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Girl_Next_Door)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 4:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/12 "2005-02-21T04:00:27Z")

</div>

> [@Mr. Blue Sky](#):
>
> I think I know why it looks fake. The blue in the background is upper half of Air Force One. My brain first thought it was the sky.

Well, given your name, it makes sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Blue\_Sky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d26b3c/32.png) [@Mr.Blue\_Sky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Blue_Sky)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 4:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/13 "2005-02-21T04:01:41Z")

</div>

> [@Girl Next Door](#):
>
> Well, given your name, it makes sense.

:smack:

I did NOT catch that when I wrote it.

Good call!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9dc877/32.png) [@astro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astro)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 4:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/14 "2005-02-21T04:02:53Z")

</div>

It’s real. [Here’s a better MSNBC pic](http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Components/Art/COVER/050220/STG_HZ_FreyedRelations_2p.jpg). The blueish-lavenderish shirt and coat are identical.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TellMeI\_mNotCrazy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tellmei_mnotcrazy/32/3419_2.png) [@TellMeI\_mNotCrazy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TellMeI_mNotCrazy)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 4:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/15 "2005-02-21T04:09:36Z")

</div>

I’m just so glad that I wasn’t the only one that thought so…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aerodave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f08c70/32.png) [@aerodave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aerodave)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 4:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/16 "2005-02-21T04:26:12Z")

</div>

That CNN photo does look a little like one of the P’shopped pics from _The Onion_. They always have that characteristic overly-contrasty look.

But I’m sure it’s not a fake…that just makes no sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alterego](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/6bbea6/32.png) [@alterego](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alterego)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 6:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/17 "2005-02-21T06:34:04Z")

</div>

the photo looks out of character for a multitude of reasons. offhand,

a) its obvious the photographer used a long lens  
b) you can discern that the photog. did not use a flash because they presumably have a very nice camera yet the photo is not sharp. also evidence of a long lens  
c) there is a very bright light on the door near the president  
d) there are other photographers simultaneously taking photos who are using a flash.  
d) they are wearing all black  
e) it was dark outside.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scissorjack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c67d28/32.png) [@Scissorjack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scissorjack)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 7:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/18 "2005-02-21T07:23:02Z")

</div>

Lies! Bush faked the entire European trip - it was entirely shot on a Hollywood sound stage! I have proof! _Proof_, I tell you!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roches](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bc8723/32.png) [@Roches](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roches)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 7:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/19 "2005-02-21T07:26:50Z")

</div>

The composition of the picture also reminds me of Photoshopped pictures. I think the lighting and contrast is the major thing – the edges look really sharp, and Photoshopped pictures necessarily have sharp edges. But Photoshopped pictures also very often show the subject above waist level – they rarely show their entire body, at least. The pose itself also seems very photographic, as if it were taken from a publicity shot and superimposed on an Air Force One background.

But I don’t think it’s retouched – I’m just saying those are some extra reasons why I think it might _seem_ retouched. Each of the subjects has shadow from at least two and maybe three or four different light sources. While it’s possible to simulate shadow with Photoshop, it certainly wouldn’t be easy (or necessary) to simulate three or four shadows.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Padeye](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/a9a28c/32.png) [@Padeye](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Padeye)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2005, 10:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100/20 "2005-02-21T10:52:16Z")

</div>

> [@alterego](#):
>
> the photo looks out of character for a multitude of reasons. offhand,
> 
> a) its obvious the photographer used a long lens  
> b) you can discern that the photog. did not use a flash because they presumably have a very nice camera yet the photo is not sharp. also evidence of a long lens

Whaaa? Since when are long lenses not sharp? And how does using a “very nice camera” mean that they did not use a flash. Photojournalists often use a fresnel lens attachment to get narrow angle/long range flash for situations like this. I think that kind of flash is a possibility because of the flat, on-axis look of the lighting.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-pic-on-the-front-page-of-cnn-com-a-photo-shop-job/291100.md?page=2)
