Is the SDMB the only forum you know of which has a subforum akin to the Pit?

Lipstick Alley is a large active forum catering to black women. It had, or perhaps has, a Back Alley. This announcement from 2018 describes it:

“The Back Alley forum is the only place where beef is allowed. It was created to try to contain those people who are unable to control their rage at whatever has angered them on the main forum. It is the cesspool of LSA, so if you decide to engage, don’t complain. The only things that are not allowed back there are posts referencing a member’s race, sexµal orientation, ethnicity, disability or religion.”

Another announcement from that year limited access to members of 30 days duration and with at least 50 posts. I don’t know if it is still extant.

How on earth did a mu end up in that word?
I see it in the original statement too, so it’s nothing to do with copying and pasting it. That statement also appears to be from 2018, so I don’t think it’s meant to get around tiktok/social media censors.

There are quite a few message boards out there still, even outside of Reddit, Facebook, etc.. I can’t keep up with the ones I’ve joined. But no, I haven’t seen anything like “the pit” on any other forum, past or present. It’s hard to know if that’s a good or a bad thing. Probably both.

One of my favorites, Ravelry (for fiber artists) has done this over the years.

Before the 2008 election, an anti-Obama group was formed called “The Bunker” which got Ravelry on Secret Service’s radar, because people were there talking about how they planned to assassinate him (and apparently thought nobody else would see it because it was password protected), and I’m pretty sure some of them are still doing time for it! For a while, the word “bunker” was flagged, and a reference to the board would get a friendly notice from the staff to please edit that post. The board was archived off-site for a long time, and later restored for historical context, I guess.

In 2020, their staff also decided to disable the conservative-oriented political boards, for similar reasons. Once in a while, a troll will slip through, but they’re really easy to catch. It’s one of those “if you can’t play nice, don’t play here” things.

I found a teen-oriented board while noodling around online one time that had the usual rules about religion and politics, and added that kids could not discuss sports teams, rock bands, or sexual experiences, real or imagined. OK, they could say “I like the Cubs” but you couldn’t say “People who like the Cubs are idiots.” I mentioned this, on Ravelry no less, and another poster said, “So, what DID they talk about?” LOL

The closest thing to a Pit I found there was their Atheists and Agnostics board. Some of those (mostly) women are brutal.

I’m sure I’ve belonged to boards that had areas for their flame wars. Though I don’t remember which off the top of my head.

I think high-street dot org used to, but their board has gone to the dogs.

I haven’t been to SomethingAwful in forever but I recall them having some sections for loosely moderated nonsense.

My former “home” was the forum for dealmac, which had a separate sub-forum for “Other” which included insults and politics (“if you must”).

.

Maybe it’s to discuss sex with µals (and other forms of animal husbandry?)…

I follow (but am not a member) of a board specializing in model cars. They are so polite it’s stupid. No insults are allowed at all, which is fine, but you can’t even say a model is bad (and some ARE!). Everybody must play nice. If a post shows off a model, and it has two postage stamp sized pictures that are dark and out of focus, and what you can see wouldn’t be competitive in a contest for 7 year olds, every (and I mean every) post is “nice model!”. What good is that?

I like looking at the board; the models can me good, but the conversation is useless.

I used to be on a board that did something like that. I don’t think it was at the direction of a mod, they were just being overly nice. The problem, as someone finally pointed out, is that you’re giving people all this excessively positive reinforcement when what they need, what they’re usually asking for, is some actual constructive criticism.
There were so many times when someone would post something, get a bunch of positive feedback and I’m just muttering under my breath ‘no, it looks like shit, stop encouraging him and give him some direction so it looks better’.

I can only speculate that sites like that are overreacting to some previous incident where people were getting toxic, and to foster a more welcoming environment they banned all negativity.

Which is absolutely the wrong thing to do. It’s nearly as bad as the toxicity, and maybe even worse. And it’s lazy. An online community needs rules that address issues, and needs those rules to be enforced properly. Making a blanket rule that doesn’t allow anyone to express any real opinions stifles communication and defeats the purpose of even having a message board in the first place.

Maybe they were worried about being sent to the cornfield.