# Is the U.S. economy going to tank this winter?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [November 18, 2004, 1:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397 "2004-11-18T01:59:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 1:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/1 "2004-11-18T01:59:00Z")

</div>

Author James Howard Kunstler has been doomsaying for a long time about the coming oil crisis, say, in the next few years, after we start to feel effects of passing the all-time “Hubbert Peak” in world oil production. (He’s got a book on that coming out next year, called _The Long Emergency._) But in his latest “Clusterfuck Nation” screed, he’s warning about an even more imminent financial crisis – [http://www.kunstler.com/mags\_diary12.html:](http://www.kunstler.com/mags_diary12.html:)

> [@](#):
>
> November 15, 2004
> 
> ```
> A theory banging around the web says that the current bull run-up in the stockmarket is exactly proportional to the amount of loss in value suffered by the dollar over the past year. In other words, that higher stock valuations only make up for the fact that it takes more dollars now to buy each share.
> 
> ```
> 
> We might not even care that much what goes on in the stock market if the finance sector wasn’t the bloated, diseased organ it has become. Some of you under thirty-five might not know this, but under normal circumstances finance is not the “industry” that drives the economy. Rather it is supposed to be the capital formation service for an economy based on the production of things of value.
> 
> ```
> The perversity of the current situation is easy to see in "blue chip" companies like General Motors and General Electric. Both of them now make profits only in their finance divisions, not from making cars or turbines.
> 
> What ought to scare people who pay attention to these things is that no sane investor will want to buy American treasury notes if the steep decline of the dollar continues and if interest rates don't rise to compensate the buyers. That leads directly to the question of whether China will continue to subsidize the US "consumer" economy by buying US treasury certificates with all the dollars we send them for the stuff they ship to WalMart.
> 
> China likes getting paid for their goods, and they like keeping their factories humming and their workers paid, and they'll go pretty far to keep the racket going. But the trouble is, they can't just hang on to what they've got -- now hundreds of billions in US debt. They have to keep buying more of it. Because if they stop, the decline of the dollar will only get steeper. If that happens, the treasuries they own will lose value. Americans will have fewer and fewer dollars to spend at the WalMart. China will have to start laying off workers. . . .
> 
> The holidays are literally upon us. It has now become an unofficial six-week hiatus in the US when little real business gets done besides the final point-of-sale for business set up during the previous eight months of the year -- the mad rush to clear all that WalMart Christmas inventory. Sometime before George Bush's second innaugural, it's going to become obvious that the financial game is over. The Chinese (and the Japanese) are going to halt their purchases of US treasury debt, if not sell off some of what they already own. Interest rates will have to rise a lot more than a chickenshit quarter basis-point. And the US housing bubble will pop with a roar that will be heard around the world. At the same time, more oil-exporting nations will demand to be paid in Euros.
> 
> Thus, the second Bush term will kick off with the dollar losing its long-held position as the world's reserve currency. This will open the door for a wholesale drop in the US standard of living. Before the winter is over, the American middle class will find itself behind on the mortgage payment, drowning in heating bills, and goggling at three-dollar jars of peanut butter on those WalMart shelves.
> 
> ```

Perhaps some Dopers more sophisticated than I am about macroeconomics can tell me if there’s anything to this – and why, if it’s so obvious to a non-economist like Kunstler, it’s not similarly obvious to _Wall Street Journal_ and so on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 2:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/2 "2004-11-18T02:20:51Z")

</div>

I will await more knowledgable dopers as well. My own guess is…no. I dont think I’d give much credence to anything titled ‘Clusterfuck Nation’ though.

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chairman\_Pow](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/838e76/32.png) [@Chairman\_Pow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chairman_Pow)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 2:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/3 "2004-11-18T02:22:06Z")

</div>

Answering as best as I can from my research:

> [@](#):
>
> A theory banging around the web says that the current bull run-up in the stockmarket is exactly proportional to the amount of loss in value suffered by the dollar over the past year. In other words, that higher stock valuations only make up for the fact that it takes more dollars now to buy each share.

Well, whenever inflation occurs, the price of stocks tend to rise with it, so I suppose this is true. One thing that John Mauldin points out is that people looking for real returns have to subtract inflation from their mutual fund/whatever to find out what their performance really is.

> [@](#):
>
> We might not even care that much what goes on in the stock market if the finance sector wasn’t the bloated, diseased organ it has become. Some of you under thirty-five might not know this, but under normal circumstances finance is not the “industry” that drives the economy. Rather it is supposed to be the capital formation service for an economy based on the production of things of value.

Absolutely true. One cannot have a growing economy with a negative balance of trade.

> [@](#):
>
> The perversity of the current situation is easy to see in “blue chip” companies like General Motors and General Electric. Both of them now make profits only in their finance divisions, not from making cars or turbines.

I don’t know if this is strictly true or not, but I have read that the most significant profits (i.e. what keeps them in the black) is their financing. IIRC GE relies of factoring agreements to keep capital flowing which should also tell you something.

> [@](#):
>
> What ought to scare people who pay attention to these things is that no sane investor will want to buy American treasury notes if the steep decline of the dollar continues and if interest rates don’t rise to compensate the buyers. That leads directly to the question of whether China will continue to subsidize the US “consumer” economy by buying US treasury certificates with all the dollars we send them for the stuff they ship to WalMart.
> 
> China likes getting paid for their goods, and they like keeping their factories humming and their workers paid, and they’ll go pretty far to keep the racket going. But the trouble is, they can’t just hang on to what they’ve got – now hundreds of billions in US debt. They have to keep buying more of it. Because if they stop, the decline of the dollar will only get steeper. If that happens, the treasuries they own will lose value. Americans will have fewer and fewer dollars to spend at the WalMart. China will have to start laying off workers. . . .

True, foreign countries are the largest buyers of T-Notes. There’re are a whole host of conspiracy-like reasons for this. The standard saw goes: China needs to prop up the US economy to ensure that it can remain solvent enough to keep buying goods. I haven’t seen very convincing reasoning why Japan keeps spending billions on Treasury instruments, but whatever.

While his theory is correct, he doesn’t make a compelling reason for them to stop buying.

> [@](#):
>
> The holidays are literally upon us. It has now become an unofficial six-week hiatus in the US when little real business gets done besides the final point-of-sale for business set up during the previous eight months of the year – the mad rush to clear all that WalMart Christmas inventory. Sometime before George Bush’s second innaugural, it’s going to become obvious that the financial game is over. The Chinese (and the Japanese) are going to halt their purchases of US treasury debt, if not sell off some of what they already own. Interest rates will have to rise a lot more than a chickenshit quarter basis-point. And the US housing bubble will pop with a roar that will be heard around the world. At the same time, more oil-exporting nations will demand to be paid in Euros.

There are more conspiracy theories re: oil and euros, but implying that the entire US economy is geared for Christmas shopping? That’s a bit difficult to believe.

> [@](#):
>
> Thus, the second Bush term will kick off with the dollar losing its long-held position as the world’s reserve currency. This will open the door for a wholesale drop in the US standard of living. Before the winter is over, the American middle class will find itself behind on the mortgage payment, drowning in heating bills, and goggling at three-dollar jars of peanut butter on those WalMart shelves.

He’ll have to come up with some definitions before we can argue anything in this last part.

As it appears to me: he’s got the facts right but he’s leaping to conclusions that don’t necessarily follow. First, he thinks this will all come to a head much more quickly than I believe it would in reality (although I suppose that’s what they said about the Depression). Second, he’s got no numbers. Economics is nothing without numbers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 2:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/4 "2004-11-18T02:24:24Z")

</div>

> [@xtisme](#):
>
> I dont think I’d give much credence to anything titled ‘Clusterfuck Nation’ though.

Why not? It sounds classier than “The Drudge Report.” 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ralph124c](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/8797f3/32.png) [@ralph124c](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ralph124c)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 8:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/5 "2004-11-18T08:14:36Z")

</div>

I think the run-up in real estate prices is a de facto result of the devaluation of the dollar. There is NO way that the trade deficit with China can be sustained. Personally, we would be a LOT better off if we made our stuff at home, instead of importing crap from China.  
Second: we are reaching the limits of our military strength. The ill-advised war in Iraq is stretching the Army to the breaking point, and we have no support from most of the world. I fully expect us to withdraw in 3-4 months.  
Finally, the high energy use lifestyle we are used to is going to end soon, but people are being deceived by the government-the automakers are still pushing out the 5 mpg SUVs as fast as they can make them.  
Yeah, a great scenario…and nobdy in Washington gives a damn.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pervert](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/bbe5ce/32.png) [@pervert](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pervert)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 8:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/6 "2004-11-18T08:25:07Z")

</div>

> [@Chairman Pow](#):
>
> Second, he’s got no numbers. Economics is nothing without numbers.

No, but hes got “\*A theory banging around the web \*”. If that doesn’t insprie confidence, I don’t know what would. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ccd318/32.png) [@Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Paul_in_Qatar)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 11:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/7 "2004-11-18T11:19:53Z")

</div>

It seems this week’s Economist (which has not made it past the censors yet) has a story quoting (somebody, Alan Greenspan?) as saying he thinks there is a 75% chance of a currency crisis in the US in 2005.

I have no idea what he means, but it is said in relation to the out of control deficit.

If so, how can I profit from it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tapioca_Dextrin)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 11:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/8 "2004-11-18T11:31:43Z")

</div>

> [@Paul in Saudi](#):
>
> It seems this week’s Economist …

If the censors let you see the online edition (they certainly do in Qatar), the article is [here](http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?Story_id=3375782)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aeschines](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aeschines/32/16251_2.png) [@Aeschines](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aeschines)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 11:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/9 "2004-11-18T11:35:58Z")

</div>

> [@Chairman Pow](#):
>
> Absolutely true. One cannot have a growing economy with a negative balance of trade.

Not true, as the US economy is growing right now. In theory as well, a trade deficit means simply that other country’s are investing in one’s own. That doesn’t prevent the economy from growing.

> [@](#):
>
> True, foreign countries are the largest buyers of T-Notes. There’re are a whole host of conspiracy-like reasons for this. The standard saw goes: China needs to prop up the US economy to ensure that it can remain solvent enough to keep buying goods. I haven’t seen very convincing reasoning why Japan keeps spending billions on Treasury instruments, but whatever.

It’s not a tinfoil conspiracy, it’s common knowledge what’s going on: China and Japan buy Treasuries to prop up the dollar and depress their own currencies. If they were to quit doing so you’d see the both currencies skyrocket. The yen hit dipped below 80 to the dollar in the early 1990s, and that was without the dire circumstances we have today. I don’t see any reason why the yen couldn’t hit the 50s (which would be heaven for me, as I’m getting paid in yen).

Lots of Japanese would instantly be bankrupt, as they are export-dependent. The flow of cheap crap from China would instantly be stanched, sending shockwaves through that economy.

In short, you’d have chaos. Imagine if governments and institutions started dumping the dollar for yen, Euros, and Swiss Francs. A perfect storm.

You might then have China trying to devalue the renminbi, etc. It would make the '97 Asia crisis look like a cakewalk.

No, it’s not tinfoil. It could very well happen. Add in skyrocketing oil prices and–

OK, I’ll stop now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aeschines](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aeschines/32/16251_2.png) [@Aeschines](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aeschines)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 11:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/10 "2004-11-18T11:37:50Z")

</div>

other countries :smack:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 12:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/11 "2004-11-18T12:57:12Z")

</div>

The holidays are _literally_ upon us?

(looks over shoulder for piggyback-riding Chanukah)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ralph124c](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/8797f3/32.png) [@ralph124c](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ralph124c)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 1:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/12 "2004-11-18T13:12:53Z")

</div>

If there was such a massive run on the dollar? As others have said, China and japan would shut down if they could not export to the USA. Similarly, Europe (Germany) would,lose their export market for cars, should the Euro go to $2.00.  
Question: what are Bush’s economic advisors saying? Are interest rates about to soar? Or have they engineered a “soft” landing for the dollar.  
Very worrisome!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NurseCarmen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/5daacb/32.png) [@NurseCarmen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NurseCarmen)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 2:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/13 "2004-11-18T14:56:32Z")

</div>

> [@Paul in Saudi](#):
>
> If so, how can I profit from it?

Currency trading (Forex). Buy Euros now, while they are low, sell them back when they are high. But if the EU pulls a Reagan and makes a devaluation to make their products competetive, you’re stuck holding the bag. I kinda doubt that’s going to happen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AmericanMaid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e480ec/32.png) [@AmericanMaid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AmericanMaid)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 3:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/14 "2004-11-18T15:09:53Z")

</div>

**BrainGlutton** , get out of my head! Yesterday, I was researching bubble factors and comparing GDP over time. After that research my major concern is that the housing bubble will burst. The Fed really needs to raise interest rates to cool the market off ASAP.

I don’t think the housing price run-up would cause devaluation but I think the defaulting of Freddie Mac and/or Fannie Mae will kick off some big badness. Also, economist Paul Krugman has said that our economy is disturbingly similar to Japan’s pre-crash economy. So either we’re going to face devaluation, delfation, and a recession. I don’t discount the Peak Oil theory either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chairman\_Pow](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/838e76/32.png) [@Chairman\_Pow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chairman_Pow)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 5:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/15 "2004-11-18T17:05:47Z")

</div>

> [@Aeschines](#):
>
> Not true, as the US economy is growing right now. In theory as well, a trade deficit means simply that other country’s are investing in one’s own. That doesn’t prevent the economy from growing.

Investing in T-Notes rather than infrastructure? It appears to me that there’s not much actual wealth being created except for pumping out more greenbacks. Perhaps you can fill me in on something else. Of course, I’m one of those guys that thinks you actually need something to sell in order to have a strong economy, but as I understand consumer spending (primarily on goods from China or other foreign producers) and the housing market (Americans buying from Americans) are driving the US economy, not manufacturing real goods. Perhaps I’m missing something.

> [@](#):
>
> It’s not a tinfoil conspiracy, it’s common knowledge what’s going on: China and Japan buy Treasuries to prop up the dollar and depress their own currencies. If they were to quit doing so you’d see the both currencies skyrocket. The yen hit dipped below 80 to the dollar in the early 1990s, and that was without the dire circumstances we have today. I don’t see any reason why the yen couldn’t hit the 50s (which would be heaven for me, as I’m getting paid in yen).

Prop up [the dollar] to devalue their own? I don’t think I’m parsing that correctly. I understand that Yen are traded on the Forex and are floating, but that the renminbi is locked in value to the dollar.

> [@](#):
>
> Lots of Japanese would instantly be bankrupt, as they are export-dependent. The flow of cheap crap from China would instantly be stanched, sending shockwaves through that economy.
> 
> In short, you’d have chaos. Imagine if governments and institutions started dumping the dollar for yen, Euros, and Swiss Francs. A perfect storm.
> 
> You might then have China trying to devalue the renminbi, etc. It would make the '97 Asia crisis look like a cakewalk.
> 
> No, it’s not tinfoil. It could very well happen. Add in skyrocketing oil prices and–
> 
> OK, I’ll stop now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gorsnak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gorsnak/32/7587_2.png) [@Gorsnak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gorsnak)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 5:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/16 "2004-11-18T17:15:35Z")

</div>

> [@Chairman Pow](#):
>
> Prop up [the dollar] to devalue their own? I don’t think I’m parsing that correctly.

Japan props up the dollar so that US consumers continue to buy Japanese goods. What’s the mystery? If they let the yen float to a more natural level vs the dollar, their export industries would be crushed.

Thing is, sooner or later it’s going to happen anyways, and when it does, the Japanese will be in far worse shape than if they’d let it happen at a more natural pace. Penny-wise, pound-foolish and all that. Personally, I’m glad the Cdn government isn’t trying to fight the rise of the Loonie (not that we really have the clout to do anything about it) for precisely that reason.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jebert](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ec9cab/32.png) [@jebert](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jebert)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/17 "2004-11-18T18:28:22Z")

</div>

> [@NurseCarmen](#):
>
> Currency trading (Forex). Buy Euros now, while they are low, sell them back when they are high.

A sure way to financial ruin. Euros now cost about $1.30, the highest in their short history. If you think they’re going higher, by all means buy them now and sell them back for $1.60 or whatever. If you think they’re going lower, you’d have to short them - sell euros you don’t have and buy them back later for $1.10 (contact your Forex broker).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Orbifold](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/779978/32.png) [@Orbifold](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Orbifold)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 6:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/18 "2004-11-18T18:33:18Z")

</div>

> [@jebert](#):
>
> A sure way to financial ruin. Euros now cost about $1.30, the highest in their short history.

If the history is short, wouldn’t that make it a poor indicator of future performance?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scotandrsn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a4c791/32.png) [@scotandrsn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scotandrsn)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2004, 10:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/19 "2004-11-18T22:17:41Z")

</div>

> [@Chairman Pow](#):
>
> There are more conspiracy theories re: oil and euros, but implying that the entire US economy is geared for Christmas shopping? That’s a bit difficult to believe.

[Believe](http://news.uns.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/021024.Feinberg.holiday.html).

> [@](#):
>
> The last-minute rush on the week before Christmas accounts for 35 percent of all holiday sales. More than 60 percent of shoppers hit stores during the last week. The holiday sales season accounts for 37 percent of annual retail sales and up to 65 percent of retail profits, Feinberg says.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aeschines](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aeschines/32/16251_2.png) [@Aeschines](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aeschines)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2004, 1:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397/20 "2004-11-19T01:27:00Z")

</div>

> [@Chairman Pow](#):
>
> Investing in T-Notes rather than infrastructure? It appears to me that there’s not much actual wealth being created except for pumping out more greenbacks. Perhaps you can fill me in on something else.

We certainly don’t disagree in this case. I don’t think the US economy is _really_ growing either. I was just saying that a trade deficit is does not require a priori an economy that is not growing. To give one example, a country could have a trade deficit one year because they were importing massive quantities of raw materials that they convert to finished goods and sell for a massive profit the next year. It’s just like a business: debt can be an essential means to pursue growth.

But, as you correctly point out, the US is a different matter right now. We are importing massive amounts of finished goods and handing treasury notes to foreign governments. We are even getting **farm** deficits in certain months, and there is a prediction we will be a net importer of food as early as possibly 2005 (cite is recent WSJ on paper article). This is big and unpleasantly important! The US was _always_ a net exporter of agricultural products.

> [@](#):
>
> Of course, I’m one of those guys that thinks you actually need something to sell in order to have a strong economy, but as I understand consumer spending (primarily on goods from China or other foreign producers) and the housing market (Americans buying from Americans) are driving the US economy, not manufacturing real goods. Perhaps I’m missing something.

The US is still an agricultural and industrial Titan. But currencies around the world are so out of balance, and foreign governments so eager to keep the dollar low, that the US has gone on a spending spree, buying Chinese cheapo goods and Japanese high-tech manufactures (chemicals, machinery, semiconductors–big, big, big amounts! that would collapse if the dollar crashed. I just finished working for a Japanese semiconductor manufacturing equipment company. Some of the pain would be offset by cheaper raw materials, but they would face the double punch of their own goods’ prices hitting the toposphere while American competitors’ goods are priced at rock bottom).

This spending spree is further supported by insane consumer debt. We are talking ridiculous levels, historical highs. Consumer debt per household is now [$18,700!](http://www.webprowire.com/summaries/692617.html) (cite from Feb.). When you add everything up, foreign governments are essentially snapping up U.S. debt so that consumers can spend like drunken sailors.

> [@](#):
>
> Prop up [the dollar] to devalue their own? I don’t think I’m parsing that correctly. I understand that Yen are traded on the Forex and are floating, but that the renminbi is locked in value to the dollar.

**Gorsnak** has it right. This is not even controversial. Take a look at this [cite](http://www.prudentbear.com/archive_comm_article.asp?category=Guest+Commentary&content_idx=35726) from [www.prudentbear.com](http://www.prudentbear.com). And [this](http://www.prudentbear.com/archive_comm_article.asp?category=Guest+Commentary&content_idx=29434). And [this](http://www.prudentbear.com/archive_comm_article.asp?category=International+Perspective&content_idx=35150).  
And if you don’t like this site, a book called [Japan’s Policy Trap](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/081570223X/qid=1100828117/sr=8-2/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i2_xgl14/104-2428036-3819155?v=glance&s=books&n=507846) came out about a year ago that details how Japan seeks to keep the dollar high.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-the-u-s-economy-going-to-tank-this-winter/275397.md?page=2)
