# Is there a non-bigoted reason to be anti-same-sex-marriage?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-non-bigoted-reason-to-be-anti-same-sex-marriage/947222>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [July 24, 2021, 8:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-non-bigoted-reason-to-be-anti-same-sex-marriage/947222 "2021-07-24T20:41:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 150

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kevlaw](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kevlaw/32/2281_2.png) [@kevlaw](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kevlaw)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2021, 1:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-non-bigoted-reason-to-be-anti-same-sex-marriage/947222/150 "2021-07-25T13:37:36Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> nobody is advocating banning you for making your argument as you’ve been doing here.

The Powers That Be have decided that certain arguments are not permitted here whether they are good arguments or bad arguments. In the words of the judge, some arguments are “incompatible with human dignity” ([Forstater v Centre for Global Development Europe - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_Forstater_v_Centre_for_Global_Development), 2019). As I said above, I think this attitude is bad for a democracy and disastrous for a debating forum.

As the title of the pit thread would have it, it signals [the beginning of the end](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-the-beginning-of-the-end/947060/65).

I am grateful that you have permitted me to make my argument here. I would like you to go further and admit that all good arguments should be permitted.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-non-bigoted-reason-to-be-anti-same-sex-marriage/947222)._