# Is there a strong Christian backlash to Trump's sedition? **URL:** \ **Category:** Great Debates\ **Created:** [January 19, 2021, 4:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-strong-christian-backlash-to-trumps-sedition/930895 "2021-01-19T16:45:04Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 112
**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\ **Post date:** [January 25, 2021, 12:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-strong-christian-backlash-to-trumps-sedition/930895/112 "2021-01-25T00:32:14Z")
> [@JRDelirious](#): > > What I see there that is another matter of concern is the way that we are expected to just know that saying “Christians as a political group” **must** to default to mean _“the right-wing political factions self-described as Christian Conservatives”_ . I got that from context but the way it was written opened up the _what do you mean, “Christians”_ line of refutation. For which I lay blame at the feet of those vocal RW factions and the way they have monopolized the discourse for 40 years to appropriate the name, but I see no need to surrender it. Sorry, I’ll try to be clearer. But I as you say, isn’t that the fault of those political factions appropriating the terms? --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-strong-christian-backlash-to-trumps-sedition/930895)._