# Is there a woman alive more willfully obtuse than Lynndie England?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [March 19, 2008, 4:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909 "2008-03-19T04:04:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MsRobyn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/90ced4/32.png) [@MsRobyn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MsRobyn)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2008, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/81 "2008-03-19T22:05:36Z")

</div>

I have no idea how to quantify the ratio of torture to abuse, I don’t care to speculate on Ms. England’s IQ, nor do I have an opinion on her geographic origins.

While I find her actions to be reprehensible and, frankly, inhuman, I think she’s more pathetic than monstrous. She’s a young girl who is obviously easily manipulated and according to her Wikipedia article, has not shown good judgment, either in Iraq or in her civilian life. I honestly believe she doesn’t understand the consequences of her actions, except as they affect her now, nor does she understand why what she did was wrong.

I especially feel sorry for her son. Both of his parents are convicted felons with dishonorable discharges on their records, and I’m sure that neither one will have an easy time supporting him.

The whole thing is just sad.

Robin

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wee\_Bairn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/90db22/32.png) [@Wee\_Bairn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wee_Bairn)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2008, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/82 "2008-03-19T22:05:51Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Guinastasia]  
Thank you-now was that REALLY so hard to provide?  
[/QUOTE]

No, I’m here to serve you- you need to know the capital of Madagascar, or the chief export of Jamiaca, just let me know. 🙂

The point was that some things one feels are so obvious that providing cites for them insults both of us.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wee\_Bairn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/90db22/32.png) [@Wee\_Bairn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wee_Bairn)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2008, 10:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/83 "2008-03-19T22:27:21Z")

</div>

Something I just thought of- suerly there _has_ to exist pictures of Lynndie and the gang descrating the Koran or other holy book- Lynndie wiping her arse with it, or using pages to stem the red tide, etc. Right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Biffy\_the\_Elephant\_Shrew](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e47c2d/32.png) [@Biffy\_the\_Elephant\_Shrew](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Biffy_the_Elephant_Shrew)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2008, 10:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/84 "2008-03-19T22:27:50Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Guinastasia]  
Again, prove that she is truly retarded, besides “look at her.”  
[/QUOTE]

I find it interesting that both she and Bush _fils_ have that “What, me worry?” thing going on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9fc348/32.png) [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Flying_Dutchman)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2008, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/85 "2008-03-19T22:36:58Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Wee Bairn]  
Something I just thought of- suerly there _has_ to exist pictures of Lynndie and the gang descrating the Koran or other holy book- Lynndie …using pages to stem the red tide, etc. Right?  
[/QUOTE]

I doubt it. I haven’t heard WW III breaking out yet. A bleeding white cunt and the koran would be an explosive combination.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Weirddave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/919ad9/32.png) [@Weirddave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Weirddave)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2008, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/86 "2008-03-19T23:13:38Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=wring]  
REally what is typical is that you took a number out of your ass and won’t fess up when called on it, twice.  
[/quote]

I have no idea what you think you’re proving here, unless it’s an impressive lack of reading comprehension. In my very first post since you or Nurse Carmen raised the issue, I addressed it. You fucking _quoted_ me, yet here you are accusing me of trying to hide something or dodge the issue or God knows what. 😕

> [@](#):
>
> And, the fact that there **was** torture at all is significant and real and shouldn’t be dismissed with your hand waving about percentages that you pulled out of your ass. The fact that many of the photos that were released allowed assholes like Rush to focus on the abuse vs. the torture is another real tragedy.
> 
> Your ‘point’ seemed to be that the press overplayed the photos, and talked of torture. You make the same error that Rush et al did (not surprising) that is, that it was claimed that each of the photos represented torture, and that the released pictures somehow are representative of the sort of thing that went on. I doubt that either point is true.

No, my fucking point, if you’d bother to pull your empty head out of your stinking, disease riddled cunt and JUST FUCKING READ WHAT I POSTED, is that the media overreaction to the abuse allowed the torture to slip under the radar AND THAT THIS WAS A BAD THING. No only do you completely miss what I CLEARLY said, probably because you have the intellect that God gave a gopher, but you then proceed to give examples that PROVE MY POINT. Jesus, there’s stupid, and then there’s aggressive ignorance, and you’re way beyond both.

> [@](#):
>
> Folks who saw all photos remarked at the time, that the rest were \*\*much much \*\* worse (the aforementioned Sen. Graham in particular IIRC). And, of course, my contention that it’s pretty fucking unlikley that all abuse/torture was photographed. So, what you have is a small assortment of photos, which showed some abuse, and some torture. I contend that we also have reason to believe that much more went on than was photographed, and that the released photos are skewed towards the much less significant abuses vs. the more significant abuses and /or torture.

People mention that they’ve seen Elvis all the time. Doesn’t make it true. This entire paragraph is pure speculation on your part, and you’re trying to use it to question the validity of something I already said was a top of my head estimate. You still continue to beat this dead horse into it’s component atoms because you have no way to counter my real argument that it was a gross miscalculation by the anti-war faction, the Democrats and the press that provided the cover the Bush administration needed to sweep the real torture under the rug. The left created the smokescreen used to hide or at least obscure the very thing they were deploring, and in a sad irony, most likely prevented what they most desired from happening. If the left had been honest in it’s reporting from the get go, and allowed the story to evolve naturally instead of lying and exaggerating in a premature attempt to paint a hated administration with the broad brush of torture before it was warranted while at the same time shocking Americans with heinous accusations, most likely Kerry would be President today. The actual evidence of the really bad stuff started to come to light just in time for the '04 election season. Instead, by the time this real evidence of actual torture started to appear, the public had become so deafened to the repeated cries of “torture, torture, torture” about abuses that weren’t that the real stuff got lost in the noise. YOUR SIDE WOUND UP FUCKING THEMSELVES. Deal with it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Triskadecamus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b19c9b/32.png) [@Triskadecamus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Triskadecamus)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2008, 11:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/87 "2008-03-19T23:30:28Z")

</div>

From the first site listed on Google for Lynddie England IQ (after the notice that it was misspelled.)

> [@](#):
>
> A military jury has begun hearing evidence in the sentencing phase of FPC Lynndie England’s abuse trial. The prosecution called no witnesses. The defense case began with a doctor who testified England was cognitively impaired due to oxygen deprivation at birth. Her problems, which include speech impairment and reading disability, were diagnosed in kindergarten.

Tris

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2008, 11:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/88 "2008-03-19T23:59:10Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Weirddave]  
No, my fucking point, if you’d bother to pull your empty head out of your stinking, disease riddled cunt and JUST FUCKING READ WHAT I POSTED, is that the media overreaction to the abuse allowed the torture to slip under the radar AND THAT THIS WAS A BAD THING. No only do you completely miss what I CLEARLY said, probably because you have the intellect that God gave a gopher, but you then proceed to give examples that PROVE MY POINT. Jesus, there’s stupid, and then there’s aggressive ignorance, and you’re way beyond both.  
[/QUOTE]

So… if the media hadn’t reported on the torture, more people would have known about the torture?

😕

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Weirddave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/919ad9/32.png) [@Weirddave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Weirddave)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2008, 12:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/89 "2008-03-20T00:20:16Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Miller]  
So… if the media hadn’t reported on the torture, more people would have known about the torture?

😕  
[/QUOTE]

No, if the media hadn’t misreported abuse as torture, then when actual torture showed up, it wouldn’t have been dismissed by people assuming it was more of the same: Media hyperbole for ratings.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![koeeoaddi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/koeeoaddi/32/408_2.png) [@koeeoaddi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/koeeoaddi)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2008, 12:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/90 "2008-03-20T00:39:16Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Triskadecamus]  
From the first site listed on Google for Lynddie England IQ (after the notice that it was misspelled.)

> [@](#):
>
> A military jury has begun hearing evidence in the sentencing phase of FPC Lynndie England’s abuse trial. The prosecution called no witnesses. The defense case began with a doctor who testified **England was cognitively impaired due to oxygen deprivation at birth.** Her problems, which include speech impairment and reading disability, were diagnosed in kindergarten.

Tris  
[/QUOTE]

(bolding mine)

If that’s true, then I retract the word ‘moron’ from the OP.

Her statements, though, seem to be lucid and coherent – if not exactly eloquent. In fact, she has enough understanding to try to deflect the blame onto others, so I’m not sure I buy that she’s too dumb to own her piece of it. Does it takes superior intelligence to feel genuine remorse?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wee\_Bairn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/90db22/32.png) [@Wee\_Bairn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wee_Bairn)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2008, 12:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/91 "2008-03-20T00:47:12Z")

</div>

What does it say about the public school system if the following is true-

\*A railroad worker’s daughter, England was reared on a dirt road behind a sheep  
farm in the one-stoplight town. \*_She made the honor roll in high school \*\* but was  
married and divorced before she was old enough to vote. And before she enlisted,  
England toiled in a chicken-processing plant._

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FarmerChick](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/a9a28c/32.png) [@FarmerChick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FarmerChick)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2008, 1:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/92 "2008-03-20T01:48:47Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Wee Bairn]  
What does it say about the public school system if the following is true-

\*A railroad worker’s daughter, England was reared on a dirt road behind a sheep  
farm in the one-stoplight town. \*_She made the honor roll in high school \*\* but was  
married and divorced before she was old enough to vote. And before she enlisted,  
England toiled in a chicken-processing plant._  
[/QUOTE]

You are just determined to hammer home that she is too stupid to breathe aren’t you? People with learning disabilities can be on the honor roll you know. She also was determined to go to college, that is the reason that she joined the reserves.

I am NOT condoning her behavior at all, it’s obviously reprehensible. But she clearly was the prime scapegoat in this fiasco. For a different perspective, read [this article](http://www.marieclaire.com/world/news/lynndie-england-1).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wee\_Bairn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/90db22/32.png) [@Wee\_Bairn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wee_Bairn)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2008, 2:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/93 "2008-03-20T02:15:57Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=FarmerChick]  
You are just determined to hammer home that she is too stupid to breathe aren’t you? People with learning disabilities can be on the honor roll you know. She also was determined to go to college, that is the reason that she joined the reserves.

I am NOT condoning her behavior at all, it’s obviously reprehensible. But she clearly was the prime scapegoat in this fiasco. For a different perspective, read [this article](http://www.marieclaire.com/world/news/lynndie-england-1).  
[/QUOTE]

I don’t think I’ve mocked her, I’ve just called a spade a spade and provided cites, but nonetheless I’ll desist from any further personal comments about her.

But no one is arguing that she’s not a scapegoat. She wasn’t the ringleader, and surely everything they did was sanctioned by higher ups who’ll never get in trouble for it. The Milgram and Stanford experiments proved even smart people will do reprehensible things if instructed to under certain conditions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhendo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mhendo/32/3159_2.png) [@mhendo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mhendo)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2008, 4:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/94 "2008-03-20T04:46:57Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=wring]  
…unfortunately, **mhendo** erred by saying ‘no abuse’ vs. the actual quote…  
[/quote]  
Indeed, and i apologize for that. Not only was i incorrect but, as you noted, my slip enabled **Weirddave** to focus on that rather than on the fact that his overall attempt at rationalization is still absurd.

And what makes it all the worse is that we’ve all seen this many times before, and i should have realized what was going on. Mea culpa. It’s the standard **Weirddave** mode of argumentation. Here’s how you play, the **Weirddave** way:

(a) produce an extensive, multi-paragraph diatribe about why all liberals who believe that A is true are idiots, and how they have, through their typical partisan stupidity, completely missed the point.

(b) insert a single short sentence or phrase, somewhere in the middle of your rant, conceding that, for the most part, A actually is true.

(c) fly into a self-righteous blather when people have the temerity to focus on the bulk and the substance of your argument and its implications, rather than on the single tentative caveat buried in the middle of the froth.  
[QUOTE=wring]  
So, where does **dave** come up w/his percentage? Hmm??  
[/QUOTE]  
Well, i happen to know for a fact that those figures are the result of an extensive analysis, one that involved poring over news stories, statements by current and for military personnel, trial and court martial transcripts, and government reports. It was only through a mere oversight, a momentary lapse of concentration, that **Weirddave** failed to post a link to his philosophical essay defining the demarcation between abuse and torture, and his Excel spreadsheet breaking down the incidence of the two at Abu Ghraib.

I’m sure that lapse will be corrected momentarily.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2008, 5:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/95 "2008-03-20T05:59:16Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Biffy the Elephant Shrew]

> [@](#):
>
> Originally Posted by **Freudian Slit**  
> Why is Maya Angelou more willfully obtuse than Lynndie Englund?

I’m still waiting to hear an answer to this one.  
[/QUOTE]  
Shot in the dark: She’s a poet. Some people find poetry, especially the kind that doesn’t rhyme, to be difficult to extract linear meaning from. In this sense, it can be said to be “obtuse.”

Maya Angelou could surely manage to at least make her poetry _rhyme_, for goodness’ sake!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Starving\_Artist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/aeb1de/32.png) [@Starving\_Artist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Starving_Artist)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2008, 6:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/96 "2008-03-20T06:06:33Z")

</div>

_Roses are red,  
Violets are blue,  
some poems rhyme,  
and others don’t._

-Anonymous

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2008, 6:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/97 "2008-03-20T06:11:22Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Frylock]  
I did, in the very post you are responding to (post #8).

-FrL-  
[/QUOTE]  
Not to my satisfaction, you didn’t. When you originally submitted your take on a summation of her statements post in #5, I understood the second statement to be referring to her specific case. Your explication of how media revelation of actions by military personnel could be construed as irresponsible in certain cases appeared to me to be applicable to a far more general set of circumstances. You gave no compelling argument that her case fell under the mantle of those circumstances.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2008, 6:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/98 "2008-03-20T06:15:56Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Starving Artist]  
_Roses are red,  
Violets are blue,  
some poems rhyme,  
and others don’t._

-Anonymous  
[/QUOTE]  
Uhh, yeah.

I suppose I could have put a winkie, or a smilie in my post, but where’s the joy in sucking all the humor out of a joke and then telegraphing the fact?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ArrMatey](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/arrmatey/32/3522_2.png) [@ArrMatey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ArrMatey)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2008, 2:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/99 "2008-03-20T14:13:15Z")

</div>

Just want to add a little something in support over how the press ‘handled’ the issue. although from a different perspective.

I read an article, or series thereof, in the NEJM (New England Journal of Medicine), about the medical ethics of doctors who worked at the prison. They were told to be involved in the questionable treatment of prisoners, and the articles were debating whether or not those that were complacent should be held accountable, and if so, how accountable should they be held?  
What was brought to light was that the doctors felt they had no choice. Certainly, according to military statute, they could refuse. However, what was going on was, at the very least, amoral. The doctors had no outside contact locally with whom they could share this information, and they felt in danger of their jobs (at the very least) or their lives (at the most extreme).  
If an article had come out saying, simply, “Mistreatment of prisoners”, it would have gone to page 8 and likely never been seen again. The words ‘torture’ or ‘war crimes’ gave it a publicity that allowed people to step forward and give their view of the story without greater fear for reprocussions.  
I know quite well that, were I in the situation of the doctors, I would’ve been very scared, too, and the ‘breaking’ of the story would’ve not only calmed my fears, but perhaps eased my conscience a bit as well, and given me the opportunity to, if not set things right, then at least have a hand in making sure such things didn’t happen again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frylock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ce7236/32.png) [@Frylock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frylock)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2008, 3:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909/100 "2008-03-20T15:49:55Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=kaylasdad99]  
You gave no compelling argument that her case fell under the mantle of those circumstances.  
[/QUOTE]

That’s because I don’t think her case fell under the mantle of those circumstances. 😕 Why would you think I think otherwise?

My point is that it’s not appalling, in and of itself, just to think a case is such that the immediate consquences are bad overall. This is an empirical question of fact. Someone who does not understand the relevant facts might make the wrong judgment about something like this. This isn’t appalling.

So the thing to say here is that no reasonable person could think that the short term consequences were what England thought they were. The best line is probably to argue that it’s appalling that she would say the consequences were bad, because it’s appallingly irrational and self-servingly motivated. And that _might_ be right. But I don’t feel confident that I know enough about England’s epistemological situation to make that judgment. It wouldn’t suprise me if she were genuinely grossly misinformed by virtue of her position and her peers. It’s a grey-area case at least, IMO.

-FrL-

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-there-a-woman-alive-more-willfully-obtuse-than-lynndie-england/441909.md?page=6)
