Is there any method of removing the Pope from office?

WTF?

I would like to subscribe to your religion :smiley:

It’s a play on the thread title. Instructions on how to remove the word “Pope” and the picture of the current Pope from Microsoft Office software. Apologies to the frog.

According to Wikipedia, John lived quite an interesting life.

And that was just his sexual misbehaviors.

Apparently, Pope John XII was one of the youngest popes, having been chosen at the age of 18, and he died aged about 27.

Obviously, there aren’t going to be a lot of reliable cites I can provide, but the traditional answer has been to pull a Woodrow Wilson, i.e., his staff limits appearances to carefully selected photo-ops, he only gets to sign the most routine documents, etc. Meanwhile, the bureaucracy continues.

It’s probably no coincidence that between the serious illness of Pope Pius XII in 1954 and his death in 1958, he named no new cardinals and several church offices remained vacant.

Sounds like the plot of a Dan Brown novel.

Here’s a recent article in Slate about whether a pope can be removed from office. Short answer: no. A pope can resign and a number have done so. However, those that did are mostly not viewed very favorably for doing so. (For example, in the “Inferno,” Dante placed Pope Celestine V in Hell’s vestibule for wimping out and quitting.)

Pope Diddy! :smiley:

(That explains the elaborate vestments … )

I think part of the challenge here is that the Pope is invariably older than … well, fill in your own punchline. Anyways, the point is that he’s more susptible to senitlity and other things that most other politicians aren’t. That should be a concern for the Church I would think.

And with all these posts about such-and-such a pope that was offed 1000 years or so ago, I don’t think they’re relevant to the discussion. Pre, say, 15th century Popes is quite different from the modern Church. The OP seems to be asking about present day.

That being said, the one thing peopel could always do is splinter and form a new church. I think it was on the Dope that I first learned about Mel Gibson’s dad who says that John 23 and all the popes after him are heretics and not true representatives of the Church because of Vatican II, he’s formed his own “true Catholic church” in protest.

Brilliant.

What condition would that be? He had Parkinson’s - this has no effect on cognition.

Not true at all. It just doesn’t always have an effect on cognition.

Yeah, if he went senile, they’d just keep him locked up sedated and or medicated. All perfectly legal, since the Vatican is a separate country.

The problem I suppose is longevity. In the “good old days” once a person started to go downhill, they died. Today, with the no-holds-barred treatments for infections, pneumonia, and anything else, a person with top notch health care could last much longer, even if their mind does not.

First off, your link isn’t a particular good one - it is subscriber-only. But your overall point is true in the general.

Was Pope John Paul II cognitively impaired by Parkinson’s? I think the evidence is against it.

Maybe we should borrow the Hardon Collider and conduct an experiment.

I know it’s mis-spelled, it’s just funnier that way.

Huh. Thanks. Maybe I’m conflating Borgia popes with the Avignon popes… in numbers at least, if not poisonings.

I’d also like to say that sorting out the Johns is easy - the triangle-shaped figure is for ladies, the other is for fellas.

And John XII is now my favorite pope.

Dan Brown novels have plots? Who knew?!

Pretty difficult shitting in buckets.

Weird. I found it by googling. It’s the first hit for “Parkinson’s cognition” (without quotes).

Wasn’t there a science fiction story in which the papacy had been functionally vacant for decades or centuries, as medical science had progressed to the point at which life - but not consciousness - could be prolonged indefinitely (and so the current Pope had been more-or-less brain dead for a very long time)?