# Is this cartoon racist (Tennis).

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [September 12, 2018, 5:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230 "2018-09-12T17:02:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 10:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/241 "2018-09-13T22:52:16Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> The question still stands and it is relevant. You can feel free to answer or not.

I’m not a caricaturist. In general terms, as I said earlier, either someone’s a good enough artist to represent a specific person while avoiding racist stereotypes, or I think they’d be wise to steer clear of caricature altogether. We don’t owe cartoonists a solution to this problem, they don’t just get a pass on their drawings appearing racist because it’s sometimes _hard_ to draw things while avoiding racist stereotypes. It’s going to be more challenging to caricature someone who does happen to possess prominent features that have historically been used as stereotypical markers in demeaning a group. It’s not a principle that can be applied without sensitivity to history, and it’s not something that’s going to be symmetrical for all social groups.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MarvinKitFox](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7ba0ec/32.png) [@MarvinKitFox](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MarvinKitFox)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/242 "2018-09-13T22:54:12Z")

</div>

> [@andros](#):
>
> The “bad person” is depicted as fat, big-lipped, huge-mouthed, frazzle-haired, irrational, and screaming literally like a baby.
> 
> Racist as fuck.

Yes, it is racist.  
Unfortunately, Serena _was_ fat, big-lipped, huge-mouthed,irrational and screaming like a baby.  
I disagree about the frazzle-haired though.  
Actually, I disagree about the screaming like a baby. She was screaming like a drunk dockworker.

Did she deserve the penalties she got? Hell yes.  
Did she receive biased treatment from the umpire? Not compared to that same umpire’s last couple of years on the job.  
Comparing the umpire’s actions to those of the McEnroe era is ludicrous, that is from two generations ago!!  
Compare it to recent standards, and you will see that every tennis player that acted like a spoilt brat, high on his/her entitlement, has been treated the exact same way.  
Of course, at this time, the _only_ international tennis player that acts like that is Serena.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 10:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/243 "2018-09-13T22:55:46Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> You needed clarification on why what platform an artwork is disseminated on matters? _Really_?

Clarification on why \*you \*think it matters and how, that’s why I asked, yes. Twice now.

> [@](#):
>
> I wasn’t complaining. I was Just. Asking Questions.

fine, answer it or don’t.

> [@](#):
>
> I clearly laid out the context when I made the analogy. To claim it was unclear or ambiguous would be disingenuous of you.

Reading back I don’t think you gave any context at all. Certainly no indication as why “fire” was being shouted in either case. i.e. what the intent was. So I think it is an unhelpful analogy and still do. Greater context from you may help but as it stands it is of no use. I certainly don’t understand the point you are trying to make by using it. Poorly chosen on your part or inability to understand on mine. Honestly, it could be either.

> [@](#):
>
> No. Not when I have the contradictory evidence of my own eyes, that artist’s [previous record](https://data.junkee.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/markknight.png) on racist cartoons, and the venue of the cartoon.

OK, so you’ve made your mind up and the intent of the artist is irrelevant. I’m not sure how well that backs up your previous comments but your view is yours to have of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/244 "2018-09-13T23:14:08Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> Clarification on why \*you \*think it matters and how, that’s why I asked, yes. Twice now.

I’ve already said why I think the platform matters. Scope and setting makes the difference between private opinion and corporate speech.

> [@](#):
>
> fine, answer it or don’t.

I did.

> [@](#):
>
> Reading back I don’t think you gave any context at all. Certainly no indication as why “fire” was being shouted in either case

Well, that clearly shows how well you read back, then, if you think I said it was being \*shouted \*in both cases. My (deliberate) word choices made intonation differences obvious.

> [@](#):
>
> OK, so you’ve made your mind up and the intent of the artist is irrelevant.

It’s not irrelevant, it’s just not credible.

Are you of the opinion artists never lie?

> [@](#):
>
> I’m not sure how well that backs up your previous comments

Which of my previous comments are incompatible with my view that this artist is lying about his intent?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/245 "2018-09-13T23:18:21Z")

</div>

> [@MarvinKitFox](#):
>
> Serena _was_ fat

In what universe is Serena Williams fat?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/246 "2018-09-13T23:19:15Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> It’s going to be more challenging to caricature someone who does happen to possess prominent features that have historically been used as stereotypical markers in demeaning a group.

True, but that doesn’t mean that those people trying to do so with the right intentions should \*automatically \*be assumed to be racist. Note that the “right” intentions here are not necessarily ones that are benign towards the subject. It is perfectly reasonable to set out to offend a public figure, in fact it is absolutely necessary that we have the capacity and willingness to do so from time to time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/247 "2018-09-13T23:26:55Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> True, but that doesn’t mean that those people trying to do so with the right intentions should \*automatically \*be assumed to be racist.

Yes, they really should. It’s the 21st fucking century, they should know better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/248 "2018-09-13T23:31:11Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> In what universe is Serena Williams fat?

The universe where _the cartoon’s not racist, dammit! The facts **must** support me because I’m **right!** _

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sloe\_Moe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8797f3/32.png) [@Sloe\_Moe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sloe_Moe)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/249 "2018-09-13T23:31:50Z")

</div>

Let’s resolve it: NEVER UGLIFY BLACKS IN CARTOONS. It’s not safe for you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/250 "2018-09-13T23:32:49Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> True, but that doesn’t mean that those people trying to do so with the right intentions should \*automatically \*be assumed to be racist. Note that the “right” intentions here are not necessarily ones that are benign towards the subject. It is perfectly reasonable to set out to offend a public figure, in fact it is absolutely necessary that we have the capacity and willingness to do so from time to time.

But good intentions aren’t adequate here. If the effect of a drawing is racist, then it is a racist drawing. It’s surely incumbent on us to know history.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/251 "2018-09-13T23:34:24Z")

</div>

> [@Sloe\_Moe](#):
>
> Let’s resolve it: NEVER UGLIFY BLACKS IN CARTOONS. It’s not safe for you.

Yes, the only safe way is to represent everyone in your cartoon as straw men.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/252 "2018-09-13T23:35:30Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> I’ve already said why I think the platform matters. Scope and setting makes the difference between private opinion and corporate speech.

no, you haven’t. You’ve \*asserted \*it several times like you just did then but you haven’t explained it and it looks like you don’t want to. Suit yourself.

> [@](#):
>
> I did.

see above

> [@](#):
>
> Well, that clearly shows how well you read back, then, if you think I said it was being \*shouted \*in both cases. My (deliberate) word choices made intonation differences obvious.

Context would be an understanding of why it was being spoken or shouted in either case. You haven’t given any context in either scenario. The volume may or may not be relevant. I have absolutely no way of knowing and you haven’t elaborated.

> [@](#):
>
> It’s not irrelevant, it’s just not credible.
> 
> Are you of the opinion artists never lie?  
> Which of my previous comments are incompatible with my view that this artist is lying about his intent?

That is a very low debating tactic. Your comment about artists lying was made for the first time just now. You can’t retroactively take a comment of mine and say it doesn’t agree with something you’ve _just said_ in clarification.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/253 "2018-09-13T23:37:15Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Yes, they really should. It’s the 21st fucking century, they should know better.

We should automatically assume that anyone drawing a caricature of an ethnic person is racist?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/254 "2018-09-13T23:44:21Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> We should automatically assume that anyone drawing a caricature of an ethnic person is racist?

Personally I first look at the caricature to determine whether it has attributes I associate with standard racist characterizations, and only after I determine the image is clearly a racist caricature (as the one in the OP is), only then do I cast aspersions upon its creator.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/255 "2018-09-13T23:45:30Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> But good intentions aren’t adequate here. If the effect of a drawing is racist, then it is a racist drawing.

I disagree. I place intent on a much higher level than you do and that is how I navigate the world.  
If you think it is not important then that’s a philosophical chasm that I can’t get over so I’ll leave it there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/256 "2018-09-13T23:48:22Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> I disagree. I place intent on a much higher level than you do and that is how I navigate the world.  
> If you think it is not important then that’s a philosophical chasm that I can’t get over so I’ll leave it there.

Out of curiousity, what’s your take on ‘classic’ disney and warner brothers cartoons, which were probably not designed by people chuckling to themselves “I’m gonna offend some people, heh heh heh”, but managed to include characterizations that their own owners won’t release to the public today because they themselves confess that the art is inherently racist?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/257 "2018-09-13T23:53:57Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> I disagree. I place intent on a much higher level than you do and that is how I navigate the world.  
> If you think it is not important then that’s a philosophical chasm that I can’t get over so I’ll leave it there.

I don’t think intent is not important. That’s how you tell the difference between somebody who made an error of judgment and somebody who’s a despicable asshole.

But it’s equally wrong to think that intent is _all_ that matters. It’s almost certainly true that most racism is unintentional. (Well, maybe that’s naive, given who we elected President, I don’t know.) It behooves us to consider the effect of what we do, and to learn that the effect of what we do may be quite different from what we intended or expected.

It’s hardly a philosophical chasm, unless you believe that being inconsiderate of others is a philosophy. It’s simply learning to be a better human being by expanding our capacity for empathy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fiveyearlurker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/da6949/32.png) [@Fiveyearlurker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fiveyearlurker)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2018, 11:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/258 "2018-09-13T23:56:25Z")

</div>

> [@begbert2](#):
>
> Personally I first look at the caricature to determine whether it has attributes I associate with standard racist characterizations, and only after I determine the image is clearly a racist caricature (as the one in the OP is), only then do I cast aspersions upon its creator.

Those racist characterizations were themselves caricatures. Why is it surprising that legitimate caricatures share characteristics? How could it be otherwise?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2018, 12:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/259 "2018-09-14T00:00:58Z")

</div>

> [@Fiveyearlurker](#):
>
> Those racist characterizations were themselves caricatures. Why is it surprising that legitimate caricatures share characteristics? How could it be otherwise?

Your second sentence is begs the question. A caricature that shares the characteristics is of historical racist characterizations is not legitimate precisely _because_ it shares those characteristics. If that leaves no non-legitimate caricatures in your repertoire, your options are to learn to be a better caricaturist, to quit using caricatures, or to accept that people calling you a racist are correct.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ambivalid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a5b964/32.png) [@Ambivalid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ambivalid)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2018, 12:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230/260 "2018-09-14T00:01:18Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> I disagree. I place intent on a much higher level than you do and that is how I navigate the world.  
> If you think it is not important then that’s a philosophical chasm that I can’t get over so I’ll leave it there.

What has more tangible impact though? Intent or effect? Obviously effect. So much so that intent in many cases is of trivial significance. I can personally relate to this as a disabled man. Just as I’m sure it’s relatable to black people and other minorities, women, even those with mental illnesses.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230.md?page=12)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-this-cartoon-racist-tennis/821230.md?page=14)
