Is this My Lai, Part II?

There is no purpose for the US to deliberately have a policy of murdering civilians. However, it is pretty clear that the military simply lies to to the public whenever they have to, and that should not necessarily be surprising (after all, sometimes they have legimate reasons for not immediately telling the truth).

As with any element of secrecy, when there is no real oversight, it gets used primarily for ass-covering rather than legitimate security purposes.

If I may nit pick that a little; Hitler pretty much had to invade Russia, to shorten arguments he needed its oil to keep going… hmmm, OK, maybe it´s not so much of a stretch to make the comarison. :wink:
But seriously, Hitler didn´t have other choice (besides trying to make peace).

Is there a whoosh or something that I missed?

Please review post #3, then post # 13.

Yes, I did so-but what was Inigo Montoya referring to?

Inigo made the “It’s okay that civilians were killed, God will sort them out!” comment in Post 3. He was being extremely sarcastic; he does not actually believe that it’s okay to kill civilians. BobLibDem, in Post 13, thought he was being serious. Therefore, Bob was whooshed.

It’s probably the clearest, most obvious whoosh in the history of the board.

I figured as much-I just wondered if it was a reference to an actual quote or what have you.

Thanks.

:smack:

It’s from the sack of the French town of Béziers during the Albigensian crusade:

(From wikipedia).

Thanks. I have heard the story before, but that was way back in my history of the middle ages course and damned if I can remember everything from back then.

I HAVE heard the quote, “Kill them all, let God sort 'em out” before, so I figured it was something like that.

Me= :wally