Is this the world's most ridiculous copyright lawsuit?

And they don’t really live in jungles either, but in eucalyptus forest and woodland.

Another popular “jungle sound effect” bird is the Screaming Piha, but this one actually lives in the Amazonian jungle.

Huh. I always assumed it was intentional, just like the “Tie Me Kangaroo Down, Sport” riff right toward the end of the song.

Kookaburra sits in the old gum tree
Eating all the gumdrops he can see
Stop, kookaburra! Stop, kookaburra!
Save some there for me.

I recognized it, having sung the Kookabura song in elementary school, and assumed that it was in the public domain. I know my elementary school didn’t pay the Australian Girl Guides when we sang it.

Why wasn’t there a law suit in the 20th century? To my mind it’s clearly an homage and not a rip off. DId anyone sue Neil Diamond when he included a snippet of “My Country 'Tis of Thee”?

Do rights on music last forever, then? I thought there’d be a limit, like with books. That song is so old that everyone probably thought it was just a public domain nursery rhyme. I bet the writer wouldn’t be happy with this lawsuit.

We used to sing it in school, back in the 50s. And we weren’t even Australian. Our version went:

Kookaburra sits in the old gum tree;
Merry, merry king of the jungle, he.
Laugh, kookaburra, laugh, kookaburra,
Gay your life must be.

We sang it as a “round.” I’m amazed I still remember this, after 50-something years.

It dates from 1932. “Happy Birthday to You” is from 1935 and Warner Music Group claims (dubiously) that the copyright for that 2030. (Insert boring discussion about works-for-hire vs. death of author+70 years here.)

In the U.S., every few years Yet Another Copyright Extension law gets passed. Since Western countries try to align their copyright laws to some extent, yep, basically assume that the copyright is forever.

Even if the song is still under copyright, isn’t there any statute of limitations on infringement? I could see suing over a new song (not that I wouldn’t think it was silly and frivolous in a case like this, but whatever) but over one from 1981? In 2009?

We learned that song in either music class or Girl Scouts (or camp–can’t remember which) in the 1970s, Midwest.

Knew it was Australian; knew it was a bird. Never heard it in the Down Under song (one of my favs from the 80s).

I think we also learned Waltzing Matilda–a song which has dubious appeal, but a damned good hook. IOW, an earworm of great magnitude.

And yet Kid Rock gets away with his rip off of Werewolfs of London.

I’m sitting here in the center of the United States, and I immediately got the song from clue 2. In grade school we used to sing that song in music class (also Waltzing Matilda, BTW).

I also had a jigsaw puzzle that was in the shape of Australia (with extra pieces for Tasmania!) which had a picture of a Kookaburra. And whattaya know, it came up on the daily Merriam-Webster trivia game just last week.

I can’t say I ever connected the riff in Down Under to that little ditty though.

I don’t recall that verse. When you sang the “ha ha” did you sound like Nelson on The Simpsons?

Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

Each to his own, i guess.

When i was a kid, we used to love sitting out the back of the house and listening to the kookaburras in the evening. I still love hearing them whenever i make a trip home to Australia.

They’re usually a lot further away than in that film clip, and the noise obviously isn’t as loud and immediate. I think it sounds great.

My niece used to have a Barney video where the kids sang the Kookaburra song. That was the first thing I thought about as soon as I read this thread, before I even got to any posts with the lyrics. I remember the flute part without having to listen to the song again, and when I think about it, it does sound rather like the Kookaburra song, which I thought was a traditional Australian children’s song, not worth suing over. It’s not like they’re going to get that much from Men at Work if they win, anyway.

The video

The 12 note sequence can be heard at 0:54.

The flute player is definitely sitting in a tree of some sort. Can anyone identify the type? I’m not sure if it’s a gum tree or not.
The only type of tree I can identify is the larch, the larch.

Almost certainly not a gum, more likely a mangrove given that he seems to be on a branch above water. But given that the branch he’s sitting on begins and ends off screen so that you can’t see trunk or leaves, it’s pretty much impossible to identify the tree positively.

Original “Down Under” song with flute riff

Kookaburra sits in the old gum tree song

Comparison

IMO that’s a bit of a stretch.

She died in 1988 - Down Under dates from 1981. I don’t know if that means she

  • never heard the song, or anything about Men at Work, being an old codger by that time
  • didn’t want to assert copyright, or didn’t care
  • didn’t realize it would even be possible to do so

(or some combination of the above)

Copyright in Australia is, I believe, death+70 years (which is ridiculous enough in itself, but don’t get me started). I have no idea if, legally, there is a statute of limitations on how soon you have to bring a lawsuit against infringements, but if there isn’t there certainly ought to be.

I disagree. I think it’s recognizably the same tune. But that’s not bad in itself. Many great works contain brief quotes from earlier works by other composers. I’ll leave it to the lawyers to argue the technical legality of it. And to musicians to argue the artistic merits.