The state can restrict fighting words, but the Court will interpret the statute to require “those personally abusive epithets which, when addressed to the ordinary citizen, are, as a matter of common knowledge, inherently likely to provoke violent reaction.” “Why don’t you just run me over with your car?” probably doesn’t rise to that level.
I like the fighting words law. It has often occured to me you could make an easy living by goading people to fight you then making criminal and civil charges against them for injury they cause.
Imagine going to a walmart, taking things from the carts of those most likely to choose physical attack as a response, then attempting to sue them and Walmart for any result from a fight. "Sue walmart because the thug might pick up items from the shelves to hit you with, because you would fall onto the floor in walmart, because walmart security didn’t protect you a customer from the thug whilst on their property etc. etc. )