# Is touching co-workers OK?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [May 3, 2019, 3:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424 "2019-05-03T15:42:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 6:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/361 "2019-05-07T18:24:18Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Sexual harassment, stealing, racism, physical assaults, etc are not annoying, they are illegal. Thus, they go beyond “annoying” and wouldn’t be including on any sane persons list of “things that bother people”.

I see. And touching me without my consent is NOT illegal?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 6:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/362 "2019-05-07T18:26:50Z")

</div>

> [@raventhief](#):
>
> This list includes it:
> 
> [https://www.monster.com/career-advice/article/7-bad-habits-that-are-secretly-driving-your-co-workers-crazy](https://www.monster.com/career-advice/article/7-bad-habits-that-are-secretly-driving-your-co-workers-crazy)

I suspect now the answer will be “I don’t mean any of THOSE types of touching. I mean other touching, that’s not on that list, that normal people don’t object to”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 6:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/363 "2019-05-07T18:34:01Z")

</div>

I’m pretty confident that any argument that uses these silly lists in any way at all is both absurd and invalid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 6:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/364 "2019-05-07T18:45:35Z")

</div>

> [@Slash1972](#):
>
> I suspect now the answer will be “I don’t mean any of THOSE types of touching. I mean other touching, that’s not on that list, that normal people don’t object to”

"Touching too much or in unwanted ways. “Touchy-feely types” who poke, hug, tickle or grab their fellow employees or who reach out and touch or pat pregnant bellies commonly drive co-workers crazy, says Miller. Remember your co-workers aren’t necessarily your friends and even those who are may not enjoy being touched.  
And indeed you are correct in that tapping someone on the shoulder or arm to get their attention is not what they are talking about.

But yeah, congrats, out of three lists you found one that includes some sorts of annoying touching!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/365 "2019-05-07T18:48:06Z")

</div>

> [@Slash1972](#):
>
> I see. And touching me without my consent is NOT illegal?

No, it is not illegal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/366 "2019-05-07T18:48:23Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> And indeed you are correct in that tapping someone on the shoulder or arm to get their attention is not what they are talking about.

Called it! 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 6:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/367 "2019-05-07T18:54:55Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> No, it is not illegal.

Wow, my Metro ride home is going to be a lot more fun tonight then. Touching for everyone!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 6:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/368 "2019-05-07T18:58:02Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> No, it is not illegal.

I find myself wondering how much this depends on whether people press charges.

‘But nobody would ever press charges over merely being mildly groped at the office - they’d fear office-politics reprisals!’

Exactly! Touching for everyone!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![raventhief](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/raventhief/32/4_2.png) [@raventhief](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/raventhief)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 7:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/369 "2019-05-07T19:00:51Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> "Touching too much or in unwanted ways. “Touchy-feely types” who poke, hug, tickle or grab their fellow employees or who reach out and touch or pat pregnant bellies commonly drive co-workers crazy, says Miller. Remember your co-workers aren’t necessarily your friends and even those who are may not enjoy being touched.  
> And indeed you are correct in that tapping someone on the shoulder or arm to get their attention is not what they are talking about.
> 
> But yeah, congrats, out of three lists you found one that includes some sorts of annoying touching!

Who gets to decide what’s too much or unwanted? You? Me? Thorny locust? Ultravires? Surely not HR- after all, they aren’t my friend.

It seems reasonable to default to not touching people you don’t know well, and no matter what, my coworkers don’t know me"well," as a general rule.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 7:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/370 "2019-05-07T19:03:05Z")

</div>

> [@raventhief](#):
>
> This list includes it:
> 
> [7 Bad Habits That Are Secretly Driving Your Co-Workers Crazy](https://www.monster.com/career-advice/article/7-bad-habits-that-are-secretly-driving-your-co-workers-crazy)

No it doesn’t:

> [@your list](#):
>
> Touchy-feely types" who poke, hug, tickle or grab their fellow employees or who reach out and touch or pat pregnant bellies commonly drive co-workers crazy, says Miller. Remember your co-workers aren’t necessarily your friends and even those who are may not enjoy being touched.

No poking, god no. No hugging unless you’re really good friends. Tickling, are you freakin’ kidding me? Grabbing? Barely within the realm of the thread. Patting pregnant bellies? For fuck’s sake!

What doesn’t appear on the list is tapping someone on the shoulder, as just happened to me five minutes ago when I was talking to a student about her writing and another student was getting ready to close a door on me and another teacher wanted me to move without interrupting the kid who was showing me her writing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![raventhief](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/raventhief/32/4_2.png) [@raventhief](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/raventhief)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 7:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/371 "2019-05-07T19:11:52Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> No it doesn’t:
> 
> No poking, god no. No hugging unless you’re really good friends. Tickling, are you freakin’ kidding me? Grabbing? Barely within the realm of the thread. Patting pregnant bellies? For fuck’s sake!
> 
> What doesn’t appear on the list is tapping someone on the shoulder, as just happened to me five minutes ago when I was talking to a student about her writing and another student was getting ready to close a door on me and another teacher wanted me to move without interrupting the kid who was showing me her writing.

I don’t particularly object to being tapped, but I’m aware that others may. So I don’t generally touch people I don’t know well. I don’t lightly touch their wrist, I don’t grab their arm, or punch them in the arm or poke them.

In some workplaces it’s quite normal, but I would say in many office environments there are other options that don’t invade personal space.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 7:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/372 "2019-05-07T19:14:05Z")

</div>

> [@raventhief](#):
>
> I don’t particularly object to being tapped, but I’m aware that others may. So I don’t generally touch people I don’t know well. I don’t lightly touch their wrist, I don’t grab their arm, or punch them in the arm or poke them.
> 
> In some workplaces it’s quite normal, but I would say in many office environments there are other options that don’t invade personal space.

This is something interesting to me. “Invading personal space” to me is related to, but not the same thing as, touching. If someone leans in close to whisper something to me, my personal space feels more invaded than if someone reaches out to tap me on the shoulder.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/373 "2019-05-07T19:17:03Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> This is something interesting to me. “Invading personal space” to me is related to, but not the same thing as, touching. If someone leans in close to whisper something to me, my personal space feels more invaded than if someone reaches out to tap me on the shoulder.

Could you perhaps understand how other people, who are not you, might consider those two things similar?

Edited to add: This conversation has taken a weird turn. I feel like you are me, and I am you, in other topics where people do things differently than I do. You even say “This is something interesting to me” which is something I say in other topics where people do things differently than me. Hmmmm…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![raventhief](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/raventhief/32/4_2.png) [@raventhief](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/raventhief)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/374 "2019-05-07T19:17:46Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> This is something interesting to me. “Invading personal space” to me is related to, but not the same thing as, touching. If someone leans in close to whisper something to me, my personal space feels more invaded than if someone reaches out to tap me on the shoulder.

This seems to have morphed from the original light touch on the wrist (over or underside, I wonder? One definitely feels more intimate to me than the other) to tapping somewhat impersonally on the shoulder (which is usually clothed, as opposed to a waist).

One seems more invasive to me, and leaning over to whisper more invasive yet. It’s all about where different people draw the boundary I suppose.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UltraVires](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecccb3/32.png) [@UltraVires](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UltraVires)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 7:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/375 "2019-05-07T19:19:03Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> No, it is not illegal.

> [@Slash1972](#):
>
> Wow, my Metro ride home is going to be a lot more fun tonight then. Touching for everyone!

> [@begbert2](#):
>
> I find myself wondering how much this depends on whether people press charges.
> 
> ‘But nobody would ever press charges over merely being mildly groped at the office - they’d fear office-politics reprisals!’
> 
> Exactly! Touching for everyone!

DrDeth is right.

There is a lot of equivocation here in this thread. Just because a tap on the shoulder or a touching of an arm or a wrist to get attention is legal doesn’t mean you can “grope” someone. That is a complete strawman. Not all touching is the same.

Common law battery expressly excludes those types of touching that a reasonable person would not find harmful or offensive. The law does not require a contactless society or affirmative consent before a handshake or a touch of the wrist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 7:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/376 "2019-05-07T19:22:10Z")

</div>

> [@UltraVires](#):
>
> Common law battery expressly excludes those types of touching that a reasonable person would not find harmful or offensive. The law does not require a contactless society or affirmative consent before a handshake or a touch of the wrist.

The law does not require that woman in the original story to speak to the man who touched her before going to HR. But she was chastised just the same.

But that’s cool. I’ll just lightly tap everyone on the shoulder and when they look at me, I’ll say “A guy on the Internet said this is legal, so there!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![raventhief](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/raventhief/32/4_2.png) [@raventhief](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/raventhief)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 7:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/377 "2019-05-07T19:25:03Z")

</div>

> [@raventhief](#):
>
> This seems to have morphed from the original light touch on the wrist (over or underside, I wonder? One definitely feels more intimate to me than the other) to tapping somewhat impersonally on the shoulder (which is usually clothed, as opposed to a waist).
> 
> One seems more invasive to me, and leaning over to whisper more invasive yet. It’s all about where different people draw the boundary I suppose.

As opposed to a wrist, damnit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZPG\_Zealot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/e47c2d/32.png) [@ZPG\_Zealot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZPG_Zealot)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 7:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/378 "2019-05-07T19:29:10Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> No, it is not illegal.

In some places touching someone who has made it clear they do not want to be touched, especially a younger person or someone of another sex, is a crime. It can also result in some nasty physical responses (an elbow to the eye, a knee to the groin) that are not illegal as forms of self-defense. I’ve taught several men this the hard way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![filmore](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/7993a0/32.png) [@filmore](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/filmore)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 7:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/379 "2019-05-07T19:30:46Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> This is something interesting to me. “Invading personal space” to me is related to, but not the same thing as, touching. If someone leans in close to whisper something to me, my personal space feels more invaded than if someone reaches out to tap me on the shoulder.

If you want to create a “no invading personal space in the workplace” initiative, I’ll support you. No touching and no leaning in close to whisper–sounds great to me! If you want to get my attention, say “Excuse me”. If you are worried about making noise, get my attention in a visual manner. Paradise!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thorny\_locust](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thorny_locust/32/431_2.png) [@thorny\_locust](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thorny_locust)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 7:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424/380 "2019-05-07T19:34:04Z")

</div>

> [@spifflog](#):
>
> And all of that is fine too. But what has been lost in all of this is that the office mates didn’t have issue with the touch, nor with her wanting to be touched. The issue stemmed from her, perceived overreaction to it.
> 
> She’s certainly allowed not to like it, and for it not to happen again. But she should have (per our Departments HR dictates) attempted to resolve this at the lowest level, which is peer-to-peer. Instead she choose to take this to HR, which to those that discussed this with me (the majority in the meeting) view this a significant overkill on a very minor issue at worst. The imbalance between the act and going to HR was the issue.

Oh good, here you are again! Could you explain to us how you know that she had never had a private peer-to-peer discussion before taking it to HR?

This is my third request; and at least one other person has asked also.

And while we’re at it, if she went straight to HR, how did this become a topic for discussion among everyone who’d been at the meeting?

(Other people have also explained, repeatedly, why someone might go straight to HR. I’m not going to get into that now.)

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> But this _ **IS** _ a slippery slope argument. This whole Thread. Look, everyone agrees that Sexual harassment, including any sort of sexual touching is inappropriate. The slippery slope now moves it down to \*any sort of touching at all, \*including tapping someone on the shoulder to get their attention.

No. People are not arguing that tapping people to get their attention in a business meeting is bad because allowing that will lead to allowing sexual harassment. That would indeed be a slippery slope argument.

People are arguing that tapping people, or otherwise putting one’s hands on them, in most (but not all) workplace contexts should not be the default assumption for normal behavior because it is, in itself, annoying and distracting and sometimes further degrees of upsetting for a significant number of entirely normal humans. Arguing that something is bad in itself is not a slippery slope argument.

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Because I have never met anyone who objected to being tapped on the shoulder to get their attention.

Might depend on your definition of “met”, I suppose. You’ve certainly met quite a few such in this thread.

I’ve never met anybody who made a habit of doing so in business meetings – until I read this thread.

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> “Tapping someone on the shoulder” or anything like that is not on either. Altho several here have claimed that a desire to not be touched is nigh universal, it’s odd it isnt even mentioned.

Who, precisely, have claimed here that a desire to not be touched in that fashion is nigh universal? Cites please?

Seems to me that what we’re dealing with is a few people who are claiming that a willingness to be touched in that fashion is nigh universal. And it also seems to me pretty clear that that’s not true.

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> It wasnt me that suggested anyone had a Mental disorder. A mild phobia is not a mental disorder, most of us have one or more.

I’m not going to argue about the technical definition of “mental disorder”. You told me, quite possibly based on a drastic misinterpretation of one or more of my posts, that I have a phobia.

It’s entirely normal human behavior not to want to be poked by people at a business meeting; or in most other situations. It is apparently also entirely normal human behavior to be willing to be poked in an extremely wide range of circumstances. Humans vary. This is also normal.

Having refreshed the thread: Maybe I should throw in here that I don’t really see a useful difference in this context between “tapping” somebody and “poking” somebody. You’re abruptly touching somebody, probably with your fingertip(s.) Aggressively jabbing at somebody with one finger is different, yes, and can also be described as “poking”; but I don’t think that’s the only sort of action covered by the word. Some of the definitions I just looked up include “tap” as a synonym for “poke”.

And I, also, would find whispering less invasive than tapping/poking; at least, unless the person’s whispering so quietly that they feel the need to put their mouth up so close that it’s touching my ear. That would certainly be more invasive, as would cupping hands around the ear so that they touch the head – but that’s because either of those would cause physical contact.

Why whisper, though? What’s wrong with just speaking in a low voice?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424.md?page=18)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-touching-co-workers-ok/833424.md?page=20)
