Slap this guy with a wet sturgeon from the Caspian Sea! ![]()
This one Great Debates, if it were a general question then General Questions. Now if it were about an election in Iran, then Elections would be the place.
Now that a deal is done, Khameini will most likely repeat some variation of the “heroic leniency” trope from 2013, under which he authorised Rouhani to go ahead with the negotiations in the first place. And if some eccentric Revolutionary Guard brigadier general as much as raises a finger in protest, the big boss’ll have 'im squashed.
Welcome to the Middle East, my friend.
So if Iran breaks the agreement, sanctions come back. Probably even stronger sanctions (if that’s possible) than today, since there’d be no question that Iran was acting in bad faith.
So, what’s wrong with that?
I’m watching Rouhani give his address to Iran, talking about the agreement just reached by 5+1. I’m not sure if the interpreter is incompetent or is this guy is just rambling incoherently?.. I think both.
American Heritage
Tantalize (verb): to excite (another) by exposing something desirable while keep it out of reach
So, my usage is correct.
To be correct or incorrect is a horse of different color from being or not being common!
It’s crystal clear, substitute tantalize with tease, excite , . . . or other synonyms.
Yes, because not all synonym words can be replaced in all contexts.
American Heritage
Tantalize (verb): to excite (another) by exposing something desirable while keep it out of reach
Longman contemporary
to show or promise something that someone really wants, but then not allow them to have it
Example in Longman:
It was wiser not to tantalize oneself.
What were her many mysteries, she tantalized herself, replaying all the loves she’d ever known.
That was a rude one !
Nah, it was not in the least about Iran election. I asked people if US is just trying to show they want to have a deal with Iran but in fact their intention is something else, and second; how possible they think WW III will take place.
I’m bewildered by your saying that I sounded arrogant. Which words of mine you took this much arrogance in me about my language ability? I just wanted to say that I know enough English not to err on some basics and not to cause misunderstanding. That’s it.
On the contrary, I always appreciate others correct my English, that’s why I’m primarily here for.
Regarding comments/answers about incorrect English I always insist on substantiated answers and reasons; not just saying, because it doesn’t sound normal here !
There are so many things in my language which they are not common amid people but it is grammatically correct indeed. So this is the same for other languages for sure.
As a parting shot, I admit that when some usages and collocations are not common in a language people quickly pick on them and mark them as incorrect.
Thanks for correcting me, I’m here to learn and grow.