# Islam, the religion of peace

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [September 15, 2010, 9:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894 "2010-09-15T21:52:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tagos](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@tagos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tagos)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 12:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/21 "2010-09-16T12:55:20Z")

</div>

> [@UDS](#):
>
> > [@scamartistry](#):
> >
> > did a little quote searching, **these are all taken out of context of course**. . . .
> 
> Which kind of weakens everything you say after this, no?
> 
> It seems to me that if you are going to consider seriously the proposition that Islam is a “religion of peace” (or a religion of anything else, for that matter) you’d want to be consider this statements _in_ their context. Otherwise, why bother considering them at all?

But that would be HARD.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nancarrow](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/c37758/32.png) [@Nancarrow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nancarrow)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 1:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/22 "2010-09-16T13:08:45Z")

</div>

> [@UDS](#):
>
> > [@scamartistry](#):
> >
> > did a little quote searching, **these are all taken out of context of course**. . . .
> 
> Which kind of weakens everything you say after this, no?
> 
> It seems to me that if you are going to consider seriously the proposition that Islam is a “religion of peace” (or a religion of anything else, for that matter) you’d want to be consider this statements _in_ their context. Otherwise, why bother considering them at all?

It is a bit intellectually lazy to insist that ‘taking out of context’ inevitably means altering the meaning. It simply means ‘not supplying the surrounding sentences’. Whether this alters the meaning or implications of a sentence is a matter of debate, not assertion. For instance, consider just the first three quotations that **scamartistry** gave:

> [@](#):
>
> Allah has cursed the unbelievers and proposed for them a blazing hell. - 33:60
> 
> Unbelievers are enemies of Allah and they will roast in hell. - 41:14
> 
> When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks, then when you have made wide slaughter among them, tie fast the bonds, then set them free, either by grace or ransom, until the war lays down its burdens. - 47:4

I admit, I have not looked up the context of these statements. It seems you would merely assert that I _must_, and that, were I to do so, some statements that (out of context) look truly _disgusting_ would suddenly be transmuted? _Into what, for Og’s sake?_

“Oh it’s not so bad after all, I can see that ‘hell’ had been defined three sentences previously as ‘a bowl of kittens’, ‘smite’ is a quaint local expression for ‘massage’, and ‘slaughter’ is just one letter away from ‘laughter’. How disingenuous of **scamartistry** to omit this context!”

As my old English teacher said, don’t tell me, show me. Demonstrate the ‘context’ that renders these statements compatible with the sobriquet ‘religion of peace’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 1:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/23 "2010-09-16T13:34:30Z")

</div>

> [@scamartistry](#):
>
> did a little quote searching, these are all taken out of context of course but it doesnt strike me as very peaceful. My feeling is that this is a book we could all do without

I’m shocked, SHOCKED to learn that this is actually the topic you want to debate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 1:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/24 "2010-09-16T13:34:41Z")

</div>

Verily, we are living through the Golden Age of Islamic Scholarship. When in the history of the world have there ever been so many experts on the contents and correct interpretation of the Qu’ran?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Razncain](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/9d8465/32.png) [@Razncain](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Razncain)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 2:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/25 "2010-09-16T14:02:31Z")

</div>

With one billion Muslims plus, obviously, not all are extremists or else we would have a bigger mess on our hands. How many there are, I do not know, but it is too damn many.

Some have zero sense of humor about their religion whatsoever. Geeze, draw a picture of Mohammad, and it is on!

> **[Islam: The Politically Incorrect Truth](https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/)**
>
> Is Islam really a Religion of Peace? What makes Islam so different?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Yodalicious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/yodalicious/32/8195_2.png) [@Yodalicious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Yodalicious)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 2:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/26 "2010-09-16T14:15:11Z")

</div>

At least the Bible is a book of peace. You know, with the stoning and the slavery… :dubious:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 2:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/27 "2010-09-16T14:24:02Z")

</div>

> [@Daddypants](#):
>
> At least the Bible is a book of peace. You know, with the stoning and the slavery… :dubious:

It’s their own fault for saying “Jehovah”.

Ow! Who threw that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 2:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/28 "2010-09-16T14:26:46Z")

</div>

I always thought it was ‘Islam, the religion of peas’. Or, alternatively, perhaps it’s ‘Islam, the religion of piece’…

Translation errors…what can you do?

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 2:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/29 "2010-09-16T14:30:28Z")

</div>

> [@xtisme](#):
>
> I always thought it was ‘Islam, the religion of peas’. Or, alternatively, perhaps it’s ‘Islam, the religion of piece’…
> 
> Translation errors…what can you do?
> 
> -XT

That would be chick peas, just to be clear.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 2:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/30 "2010-09-16T14:33:24Z")

</div>

It doesn’t flow as well…Islam is the religion of chick peas. Just doesn’t have the same ring to it…

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 4:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/31 "2010-09-16T16:36:08Z")

</div>

I have a hard time taking this thread seriously, because it doesn’t simultaneoulsy advocate abolishing the Bible. If the Koran is bad, surely the Bible is equally so. That one is focused on to the exclusion of the other causes me to doubt that the arguer is disclosing all the premises they are reaching their conclusions from.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 4:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/32 "2010-09-16T16:39:15Z")

</div>

Well, they aren’t analogous. After all, Christianity is the religion of glove, while Islam is the religion of peas. You can see the difference, surly??

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9fc348/32.png) [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Flying_Dutchman)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 4:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/33 "2010-09-16T16:40:45Z")

</div>

> [@begbert2](#):
>
> I have a hard time taking this thread seriously, because it doesn’t simultaneoulsy advocate abolishing the Bible.

No one is arguing for abolishing the Koran.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Yumblie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/76d3ee/32.png) [@Yumblie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Yumblie)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 4:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/34 "2010-09-16T16:47:48Z")

</div>

I know a few muslims. They are well aware that I do not subscribe to their religious beliefs.

Why am I not dead?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dallas\_Jones](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dallas_jones/32/3277_2.png) [@Dallas\_Jones](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dallas_Jones)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 4:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/35 "2010-09-16T16:49:05Z")

</div>

> [@xtisme](#):
>
> I always thought it was ‘Islam, the religion of peas’.

So those “Visualize Whirled Peas” bumper stickers are correct, Islam plans to take over the whorl. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 4:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/36 "2010-09-16T16:50:02Z")

</div>

> [@scamartistry](#):
>
> (and please no “but the bible says X bla bla bla”, Im not speaking about the bible nor am I defending it, nor do I really care about it, Islam is the topic)

I’m not sure what your topic _is_. Islam isn’t really a subject for debate. Your initial question was answered. What do you looking for here? Do you want to debate the meaning or implications of the verses you quoted upthread, or perhaps the Harris quote? If you don’t have anything specific to offer this may be more of a Pit thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 4:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/37 "2010-09-16T16:53:06Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Yumblie]  
Why am I not dead?  
[/QUOTE]

Give it time. It’s like the Dim Mak from The Men Who Stare at Goats…

[QUOTE=ghardester]  
So those “Visualize Whirled Peas” bumper stickers are correct, Islam plans to take over the whirl.  
[/QUOTE]

Exactly! Bastards want to take over the whirl! They want to swirl Islam (via the board) across the entire whirl, and we just sit back and watch…

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 5:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/38 "2010-09-16T17:23:15Z")

</div>

Islam is founded much more on military conquest than most other religions. The founder of Islam conquered cities and set himself up as a military leader. The founder of Christianity was killed by the military authorities.

Christianity later was incorporated into the existing political structure (the Roman empire) several hundred years after its beginning. Islam was part of the political structure right from the start.

I don’t think it is exactly false to say that Islam is a religion of peace, but the elements that can be interpreted to lead to violence are much more central to the message than they are in, say, Buddhism.

The first person I ever heard characterize Islam as a “peaceful religion” was George Bush. It was in the context of post-911. I understand why he said it, and what he was trying to get at, but I also understand why many folks would find it hard to believe.

I am reading thru the Quran, and am about three quarters of the way thru. And this -

> [@](#):
>
> I cannot judge the quality of the Arabic; perhaps it is sublime. But the book’s contents are not. On almost every page, the Koran instructs observant Muslims to despise nonbelievers. On almost every page, it prepares the ground for religious conflict.

is pretty accurate.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gustav](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/919ad9/32.png) [@Gustav](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gustav)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/39 "2010-09-16T17:28:48Z")

</div>

It occurs to me that pretty much every time I’ve heard islam referred to as “the religion of peace” it has been in a sarcastic tone and usually followed by something like “my ass”. While I’m sure one can scare up examples of people saying it unironically as well, it’s starting to feel more like the old “obama the messiah” meme and others that people like to trot out for easy targets to argue against.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2010, 6:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894/40 "2010-09-16T18:30:30Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](#):
>
> > [@begbert2](#):
> >
> > I have a hard time taking this thread seriously, because it doesn’t simultaneoulsy advocate abolishing the Bible.
> 
> No one is arguing for abolishing the Koran.

On review, I suppose you’re right.

But still this thread seems to be based upon throwing stones at the glass house of Islam’s (imagined?) claim of being a “turn the other cheek” religion. Which makes one want to check where the stones are being thrown _from_ - when someone throws stones from inside their _own_ glass house, there tends to be collateral damage.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/islam-the-religion-of-peace/553894.md?page=3)
