# Israeli election: Likud out, Qadima in.  Now what?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [March 29, 2006, 1:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391 "2006-03-29T13:17:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 1:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/1 "2006-03-29T13:17:20Z")

</div>

Yesterday’s Israeli election made the new Qadima (or Kadima – news reports spell it both ways) Party the largest in the Knesset (28 seats out of 120). Well short of a majority, it probably will form a governing coalition with Labor (finishing second with 20 seats). Likud, long the dominant party, was reduced to 11 seats. Acting Prime Minister Olmert, of Qadima, almost certainly will become the new PM. [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060329/ap\_on\_re\_mi\_ea/israel\_elections\_45;](http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060329/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_elections_45;) [http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060328/ts\_nm/israel\_election\_dc\_20](http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060328/ts_nm/israel_election_dc_20)

So now what? What will a Qadima-Labor government do about the West Bank and the Israeli settlements there? Will it be better or worse suited than Likud was to negotiated with a Hamas-led Palestinian Authority?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FWorld](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/5daacb/32.png) [@FWorld](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FWorld)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 1:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/2 "2006-03-29T13:38:04Z")

</div>

IMHO, any Israeli political force must recognise that it’s time to leave the West Bank and East Jerusalem. They should take up the [Arab offer](http://www.al-bab.com/arab/docs/league/peace02.htm) for peace and normalisation in exchange for full withdrawal to 1967 lands.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FWorld](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/5daacb/32.png) [@FWorld](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FWorld)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/3 "2006-03-29T14:00:58Z")

</div>

Here are a couple of background links from the BBC.

[One for the actual story](http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4855154.stm)  
[One for the plans of Kadima, now that it has won](http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4856762.stm)  
[One for of Ehud Olmert, the new Prime Minster of Israel](http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4596172.stm)  
[And one for his most likely coalition partner.](http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4425260.stm)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SentientMeat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/43a26b/32.png) [@SentientMeat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SentientMeat)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 2:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/4 "2006-03-29T14:29:37Z")

</div>

In a word, [settlements](http://www.btselem.org/Download/Settlements_Map_Eng.pdf).

That map shows the Israeli settlements in the West Bank in blue. The Kadima pledge is to finalise Israel’s borders by 2010, and start withdrawing from isolated “outpost” settlements soon.

Now, look at that map. You can see how much of a problem settlements cause to any future Palestinian state. They make it hopelessly discontinuous, such that a 3 mile trip between one town and another (_eg._ Qualqilya and its neighbours) might require a 50 mile diversion. Also, you’ll notice that the settlements all control _valleys_, where all the fertile land and water resources lie.

A **viable** palestinian state simply cannot exist alongside most of those settlements. Some near the western border can remain, yes (perhaps even Alfe Menashe, which effectively makes Qalqilya a prison town). But the large, deep settlements like Ariel, Quarne Shomeron and Ma’ale Adummim doom such a state to arid, infertile slavery. Unfortunately, since nearly a quarter of a million people live in those settlements, handing them over will be far more difficult than in Gaza.

So, Israeli dopers (paging **Noone Special, Alessan** , _etc._), which substantial settlements will Kadima seek to give up soon? From that map, I’d say places like Homesh, Eli/Shilo, Elon Moreh and Itamar are ripe for starters, with the Eastern regions and Ariel, QS and MA being served some kind of notice of intent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rune](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e68b1a/32.png) [@Rune](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rune)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 2:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/5 "2006-03-29T14:47:45Z")

</div>

> [@FWorld](#):
>
> IMHO, any Israeli political force must recognise that it’s time to leave the West Bank and East Jerusalem. They should take up the [Arab offer](http://www.al-bab.com/arab/docs/league/peace02.htm) for peace and normalisation in exchange for full withdrawal to 1967 lands.

Pretty much what they did in the latest round of Camp David negotiations with Barak and Arafat under Clinton. Anyway the current Palestinian government will never agree to any kind of peace with Israel no matter what they do, and demands up front an unconditional return of all the refugees.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FWorld](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/5daacb/32.png) [@FWorld](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FWorld)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 3:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/6 "2006-03-29T15:00:48Z")

</div>

> [@Rune](#):
>
> Pretty much what they did in the latest round of Camp David negotiations with Barak and Arafat under Clinton. Anyway the current Palestinian government will never agree to any kind of peace with Israel no matter what they do, and demands up front an unconditional return of all the refugees.

Depending on [who you believe](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camp_David_2000_Summit) , Barak offered 70-95% of the West Bank, while leaving parts of East Jerusalem in Israeli hands. If Barak \*did \*give a dream offer, why would Arafat refuse?  
Second, who would’ve believed the Likud government would’ve made peace with Egypt in 1978? It can be the same with Hamas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jonathan\_Chance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jonathan_chance/32/701_2.png) [@Jonathan\_Chance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jonathan_Chance)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 3:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/7 "2006-03-29T15:08:36Z")

</div>

I think Arafat would refuse because his hold on actual power (as opposed to power ‘recognized’ by the west) was a LOT more tenuous than generally believed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 3:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/8 "2006-03-29T15:19:55Z")

</div>

Israel’s not going to give up East Jerusalem. Even if they pull out of the West Bank entirely, they’re not going to give up East Jerusalem. That’s not on the table.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SentientMeat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/43a26b/32.png) [@SentientMeat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SentientMeat)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 3:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/9 "2006-03-29T15:27:38Z")

</div>

> [@Captain Amazing](#):
>
> Israel’s not going to give up East Jerusalem. Even if they pull out of the West Bank entirely, they’re not going to give up East Jerusalem. That’s not on the table.

Just to clarify, do you mean the tiny eastern portion of the Old City, the 32,000-strong settlement Ma’ale Adummim to the east **of** Jerusalem, or _West_ Jerusalem (which is in Israel proper)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FWorld](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/5daacb/32.png) [@FWorld](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FWorld)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 3:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/10 "2006-03-29T15:29:00Z")

</div>

I don’t understand, **Jonathan Chance**. Assuming what you say is true, what could consolidate his power more than ending occupation and creating a fully legitimate Palestinian state? I mean, he’d claim that he got the Palestinians 95% of the 1967, including East Jerusalem, if Barak’s offer was as good as \*\*Rune \*\*said it was.

And wasn’t East Jerusalem offered in 2000, or at least parts of it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FWorld](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/5daacb/32.png) [@FWorld](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FWorld)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 3:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/11 "2006-03-29T15:30:36Z")

</div>

Yes, that would be the 1967 **lands**. :smack:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 3:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/12 "2006-03-29T15:45:26Z")

</div>

> [@FWorld](#):
>
> And wasn’t East Jerusalem offered in 2000, or at least parts of it?

There was a proposal that some of the Arab parts of Jerusalem (Kafr Aqab, Shualat, Issawaya, Wadi Joz, A-Tur, Abu Tor, Sur Baher, and Beit Safala) would either get self rule or become part of the proposed Palestinian city of Al-Quds, in exchange for Jerusalem annexing Givat Ze’ev, Ma’aleh Adunim, Gush Etzion, Kokhav Yaakov, Geva Binyamen, Kedar, and Har Gilo. Plus the Muslim and Christian quarters of the Old City would be autonomous. But nothing came of it. .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FWorld](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/5daacb/32.png) [@FWorld](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FWorld)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 3:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/13 "2006-03-29T15:46:56Z")

</div>

Thanks for the clarification 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/14 "2006-03-29T15:52:25Z")

</div>

> [@SentientMeat](#):
>
> Just to clarify, do you mean the tiny eastern portion of the Old City, the 32,000-strong settlement Ma’ale Adummim to the east **of** Jerusalem, or _West_ Jerusalem (which is in Israel proper)?

I don’t mean any of those, actually. 🙂 I mean the current municipality of Jerusalem. Here’s a fairly confusing map showing the Jerusalem municipal boundries (the dashed line):

[http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/jer97map.html](http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/jer97map.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SentientMeat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/43a26b/32.png) [@SentientMeat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SentientMeat)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/15 "2006-03-29T15:54:35Z")

</div>

Ah, so Ma’ale Adummim is _permanent_ in Israeli eyes, despite the fact that it severs Jerusalem and Jericho pretty terminally for any future state?

That doesn’t look at all promising, then. I can see more of [these](http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4855056.stm) being directed there over the next decades, and Israeli jets won’t have the option of keeping the region [awake for days](http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1607450,00.html) with sonic booms as a lesson without subjecting their _own_ to the same.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 4:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/16 "2006-03-29T16:06:24Z")

</div>

> [@SentientMeat](#):
>
> Ah, so Ma’ale Adummim is _permanent_ in Israeli eyes, despite the fact that it severs Jerusalem and Jericho pretty terminally for any future state?

No. Ma’ale Adummim isn’t part of Jerusalem. It’s outside the municipal boundary. It’s not likely that Ma’ale Adummim will be withdrawn from, but that’s a settlement issue, not a Jerusalem issue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jonathan\_Chance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jonathan_chance/32/701_2.png) [@Jonathan\_Chance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jonathan_Chance)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 4:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/17 "2006-03-29T16:15:25Z")

</div>

> [@FWorld](#):
>
> I don’t understand, **Jonathan Chance**. Assuming what you say is true, what could consolidate his power more than ending occupation and creating a fully legitimate Palestinian state? I mean, he’d claim that he got the Palestinians 95% of the 1967, including East Jerusalem, if Barak’s offer was as good as \*\*Rune \*\*said it was.
> 
> And wasn’t East Jerusalem offered in 2000, or at least parts of it?

What I’m saying is that Arafat had the (shaky) support of the Palestinian people provided he kept up the facade of being in negotiations to win it all. With Hamas and other groups pushing for the ‘drive them into the sea’ point of view he was severely limited in what he could do.

Hell, look at all that craziness in the nineties about his being willing to state that he would renounce violence but not if he had to do it in any language other than English. Arafat didn’t truly have the political will or backing to settle for less than the entire ball-of-wax.

That said, Arafat’s dead. I think the turnover of power to Hamas is, in the long run, a good thing for the region for a few reasons:

1. Things were stalemated. At least this shakes them up and sets things moving again.

2. Hamas will, quickly I believe, discover that governing is a HELL of a lot harder than opposing and may have moderate elements that can come to the fore when their promise of destroying Israel is shown to be nothing but hot air.

So I, for whatever a non-practicing american Jew’s opinion is worth, am hopeful for Kadima’s victory (however weak it was) and want to see things move forward from here.

As I said, at least there’s motion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 4:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/18 "2006-03-29T16:22:50Z")

</div>

I can’t envision the West Bank settlements being evacuated the way the Gaza settlements were without resistance, to the point of Israelis shedding the blood of other Israelis. Seems to me the only workable solution is for Israel to withdraw to the 1967 border (except for the parts of East Jerusalem formally annexed in 1980), and wash its hands of the settlements: Don’t force the settlers to leave, just make it clear the Israeli Defense Force will no longer protect them or be responsible for their safety, **whatever the Palestinians might do.** They can take their chances as a minority within the Palestinian state, or they can go west.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 4:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/19 "2006-03-29T16:54:45Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> I can’t envision the West Bank settlements being evacuated the way the Gaza settlements were without resistance, to the point of Israelis shedding the blood of other Israelis.

It depends. For example, the settlement of Ma’ale Adummim is a city of 30,000 people. On the other hand, Ein Prat has one family. Obviously, it’ll be a lot easier to evacuate Ein Prat than it will be to evacuate Ma’ale Adummim.

> [@](#):
>
> Don’t force the settlers to leave, just make it clear the Israeli Defense Force will no longer protect them or be responsible for their safety, **whatever the Palestinians might do.** They can take their chances as a minority within the Palestinian state, or they can go west.

That’s not an option. If Israel does that, and the settlers start getting killed, Israel will have to step back in to protect them. One of the reasons Israel was founded was to guarantee that at least one country in the world won’t sit back and do nothing when Jews get slaughtered. The public opinion would force Israel to respond.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 4:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391/20 "2006-03-29T16:59:58Z")

</div>

> [@Captain Amazing](#):
>
> That’s not an option. If Israel does that, and the settlers start getting killed, Israel will have to step back in to protect them. One of the reasons Israel was founded was to guarantee that at least one country in the world won’t sit back and do nothing when Jews get slaughtered. The public opinion would force Israel to respond.

Would Israeli public opinion allow for a government-forced evacuation of Ma’ale Adummim?

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/israeli-election-likud-out-qadima-in-now-what/350391.md?page=2)
