# It is implausible that pchaos is a lawyer and he should stop claiming to be one

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [February 14, 2013, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316 "2013-02-14T20:34:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 23

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BottledBlondJeanie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/0ea827/32.png) [@BottledBlondJeanie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BottledBlondJeanie)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 7:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/441 "2013-02-18T19:09:52Z")

</div>

> [@pchaos](#):
>
> I’m a Catholic, and I’m not here to proselytize, but I do believe that if atheists really had what they considered to be the truth. They would be more active in promoting their agenda.

Perhaps I’m completely wrong and it’s a regional thing, but despite being potentially grammatically correct, as a former Catholic, I’d never refer to a priest as a ‘preacher’ per posr 328. It’s possible the OP was trying to avoid being decried a Catholic, but if his faith is strong…?

As for the lawyer claim, at most I’ll give him the attribution of ignorant law school student-nowhere close to RNATB or jtgain despite my disagreements with the latter.

But please troll, stay; you’re fun!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 7:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/442 "2013-02-18T19:11:54Z")

</div>

> [@pchaos](#):
>
> Once again, when you become irritated, I know that I’m hitting a nerve.

Kicking someone in the balls strikes a nerve. If someone did that to you would you say they were on the right track?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FloatyGimpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/floatygimpy/32/7750_2.png) [@FloatyGimpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FloatyGimpy)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 7:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/443 "2013-02-18T19:14:33Z")

</div>

> [@pchaos](#):
>
> **Once again, when you become irritated, I know that I’m hitting a nerve**.

You’ve never seen someone become very annoyed with a mosquito that won’t stop buzzing around their head?

That’s kind of what you are, a mosquito, or a flea. You’re just an irritant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![simster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/simster/32/1047_2.png) [@simster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/simster)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 7:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/444 "2013-02-18T19:16:26Z")

</div>

> [@pchaos](#):
>
> Once again, when you become irritated, I know that I’m hitting a nerve.

you don’t seem to understand the difference between irritation and frustration.

> [@pchaos](#):
>
> Is it true or false that an ethical man would want to share the truth with others?

False dichotomy - define “truth” in this context.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BottledBlondJeanie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/0ea827/32.png) [@BottledBlondJeanie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BottledBlondJeanie)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/445 "2013-02-18T19:17:50Z")

</div>

::derp::

Meant ‘Pastor.’

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheshire\_Human](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Cheshire\_Human](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheshire_Human)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 7:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/446 "2013-02-18T19:18:46Z")

</div>

> [@QuickSilver](#):
>
> What you have a need for is to feel like what you say matters. And the stronger and more adamant the response in oppositon, the more relevant you feel.

tl;dr Troll.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheshire\_Human](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Cheshire\_Human](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheshire_Human)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 7:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/447 "2013-02-18T19:33:28Z")

</div>

> [@BottledBlondJeanie](#):
>
> Perhaps I’m completely wrong and it’s a regional thing, but despite being potentially grammatically correct, as a former Catholic, I’d never refer to a priest as a ‘preacher’ per posr 328. It’s possible the OP was trying to avoid being decried a Catholic, but if his faith is strong…?

It was his constant switching between Catholic and Protestant idiom, with the occasional random thing that didn’t fit either, in this and other threads, that first prompted me to ask his denomination, up-thread. It was twigging my _troll-o-meter_ pretty heavily.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 7:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/448 "2013-02-18T19:45:54Z")

</div>

> [@pchaos](#):
>
> Okay, in high school I read Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, I also have read some about her philosophy of Objectivism. But I don’t consider her philosophy to be sufficiently coherent.
> 
> Atheism appeals to the mind and that simply is not enough to me and many theists.
> 
> Religion appeals to the heart and soul of man that is it’s advantage. That’s what makes it a coherent philosophy and world view.

And this shows that you don’t even understand what “coherent” means.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pancakes3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ba9def/32.png) [@pancakes3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pancakes3)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 7:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/449 "2013-02-18T19:46:30Z")

</div>

> [@pchaos](#):
>
> Is it true or false that an ethical man would want to share the truth with others?

Sharing the truth like like teaching evolution in schools, the separation of church and state, and sharing the benefits of science (or as you like to term it means to an end)?

Or do you mean more actively like uniting under the banner of the Atheist Sun and spread the cold logical TRUTH to all those who are holding onto their petty superstitions, vestigial from a bygone, ignorant age.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pchaos](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/258eb7/32.png) [@pchaos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pchaos)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 8:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/450 "2013-02-18T20:20:52Z")

</div>

> [@simster](#):
>
> False dichotomy - define “truth” in this context.

You know what I mean. When you ask me to further define, I know I hit another nerve. Human Action is much smarter than most of you.

If you had a truth that would make the lives of mankind better. Would an ethical man share it with other men?

According to atheists the answer would be “no, because we don’t have an agenda, we don’t believe in organizations.” And we’re not interested in leaving a legacy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FloatyGimpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/floatygimpy/32/7750_2.png) [@FloatyGimpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FloatyGimpy)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/451 "2013-02-18T20:24:35Z")

</div>

> [@pchaos](#):
>
> When you ask me to further define, I know I hit another nerve.

“Bzzzzzzzzzzz” “SWAT!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![simster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/simster/32/1047_2.png) [@simster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/simster)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 8:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/452 "2013-02-18T20:32:35Z")

</div>

> [@pchaos](#):
>
> You know what I mean. When you ask me to further define, I know I hit another nerve. Human Action is much smarter than most of you.
> 
> If you had a truth that would make the lives of mankind better. Would an ethical man share it with other men?
> 
> According to atheists the answer would be “no, because we don’t have an agenda, we don’t believe in organizations.” And we’re not interested in leaving a legacy.

‘Revealed’ truth as in “believe in christ and you can have anything you want if you pray hard enough”

Or

‘Factual, Objective’ Truth as in “Smoking has been shown to have a high correlation with x, y and z diseases”.

So - ‘Truth’ has a very differnt meaning depending on the context.

And yet again - you also make assumptions about atheists that do not fit the facts.

You’re a fucking moron.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![deltasigma](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e5b9ba/32.png) [@deltasigma](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/deltasigma)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 8:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/453 "2013-02-18T20:40:36Z")

</div>

> [@pchaos](#):
>
> According to atheists the answer would be “no, because we don’t have an agenda, we don’t believe in organizations.” And we’re not interested in leaving a legacy.

I guess you’re not familiar with [humanism](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanism).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheshire\_Human](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Cheshire\_Human](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheshire_Human)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/454 "2013-02-18T20:43:32Z")

</div>

He’s been told about that one. Repeatedly. With links. Didn’t seem to penetrate the concrete his head seems to be filled with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![deltasigma](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e5b9ba/32.png) [@deltasigma](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/deltasigma)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 8:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/455 "2013-02-18T20:51:34Z")

</div>

> [@Cheshire\_Human](#):
>
> He’s been told about that one. Repeatedly. With links. Didn’t seem to penetrate the concrete his head seems to be filled with.

Sorry, I haven’t followed the whole thread, but his MO seems to be to be to just ignore anything he doesn’t agree with. I would imagine that’s a very important ability for a dedicated theist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AClockworkMelon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aclockworkmelon/32/10803_2.png) [@AClockworkMelon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AClockworkMelon)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 9:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/456 "2013-02-18T21:02:16Z")

</div>

[**pchaos** talks about being an attorney.](http://www.network54.com/Forum/153652/thread/1190241060/1190323411/The+Felon+Behind+O.J.%27s+Bust++-+Meet+Thomas+Riccio-+Arsonist%2C+prison+escapee%2C+stolen+goods)

> [@pchaos](#):
>
> I’m not a criminal attorney.

[**pchaos** takes heat over his profession](http://www.network54.com/Forum/153652/thread/1186367231/1187059331/Ty+Cobb-+Would+He+Have+Gotten+Into+the+Hall+in+1929)

> [@pchaos](#):
>
> You know as well as I do that in order to continue practicing law you need to have a thick skin. You are going to quit practicing before me because my skin is thicker than yours.

[**pchaos** talks shop](http://www.network54.com/Forum/153652/thread/1177170162/1177286480/FInal+Sale%5B/url)

> [@pchaos](#):
>
> I forgot which state it was, but supposedly in that state it is not malpractice for an attorney to misapply the Rule Against Perpetuities. I’m not even I spelled it right.

[Others have trouble believing he’s a lawyer, too](http://www.network54.com/Forum/153652/thread/1183655742/1184126961/Is+the+Grading+System+Broken-)

> [@](#):
>
> Why is it that I have great difficulty believing that you’re an attorney?

[**pchaos** posts “An Offshoot of First Amendment - The Freedom to Post”](http://www.network54.com/Forum/567138/thread/1192421567/last-1192987885/An+Offshoot+of+First+Amendment-+The+Freedom+to+Post)

> [@](#):
>
> Peter,
> 
> What in the world does the first ammendment have to do with posting on a baseball memorabilia forum?

> [@](#):
>
> Greg–congratulations! You understand the First Amendment and its relationship to an internet chat board better than Peter does.

More from elsewhere:

> [@](#):
>
> I have to agree with the criticism of Peter on his inability to understand the difference between ‘your’ and ‘you’re’. Honestly, as an attorney it stuns me.

> [@](#):
>
> Peter, I’m sure you’re quite the persuasive lawyer. I guess you can always win an argument if you take both sides of the issue.

> [@](#):
>
> Let’s hope none of Peter C’s perspective clients read any of his posts here. He might find himself with even more free time on his hands. And you know what that means? More inane posts.

I’m not going to quote posts revealing where he claims to practice law, but people here aren’t the first to be shocked by it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pancakes3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ba9def/32.png) [@pancakes3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pancakes3)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 9:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/457 "2013-02-18T21:07:43Z")

</div>

Ha. Fantastic. There were 2 “your/you’re” mishaps by pchaos on the previous page alone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smeghead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f1d935/32.png) [@Smeghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smeghead)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 9:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/458 "2013-02-18T21:19:40Z")

</div>

Troll. Bored now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![simster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/simster/32/1047_2.png) [@simster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/simster)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/459 "2013-02-18T21:24:08Z")

</div>

> [@AClockworkMelon](#):
>
> I’m not going to quote posts revealing where he claims to practice law, but people here aren’t the first to be shocked by it.

I was actually able to go from what you posted to find actual evidence he is, in fact, an attorney\*\* - color me shocked.

He’s still a moron on the board - and not a good one at that - and apparently is well known for being a troll.  
\*\*I’ll leave the details to others to follow - I actually found a motion that was filed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pchaos](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/258eb7/32.png) [@pchaos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pchaos)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2013, 9:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316/460 "2013-02-18T21:35:04Z")

</div>

> [@deltasigma](#):
>
> I guess you’re not familiar with [humanism](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanism).

Yes, it was Human Action that brought Secular Humanism to my attention and I forgot to thank him.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316.md?page=22)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/it-is-implausible-that-pchaos-is-a-lawyer-and-he-should-stop-claiming-to-be-one/650316.md?page=24)
