Saw it for the first time yesterday (was playing on E! in a continuous loop the whole day). Didn’t give a rip about lifeless Hays Code gruel 40 years ago and don’t give a rip now. Refuse to make allowances for “that’s how things were back then”. Had trouble paying attention, so I missed out on a lot of plot details, but got the overall gist. Thoughts, no particular order.
The opening with everyone’s childhoods completely turned me off because it showed people acting like rude, disgusting jerks with zero pushback from anyone. I categorically do not accept this. Any era, any style, any writer, any excuse, HARD PASS. (I’m not going to sidetrack this with links to my Assassin’s Creed Valhalla and Turning Red threads, but feel free to look them up if you like.)
The school dance, particularly after George and Mary fell into the pool, was on the skeevy side but at least seemed in character for George. He’s not a filthy punk, he just has some weird small-town beliefs.
Someone mention way upthead that Franz Kafka wasn’t against becoming filthy rich, he was against sitting on all that money and doing nothing to boost the economy; that’s why you were supposed to hate Mr. Potter. Seeing the lives of people like Leona Helmsley, Ross Perot, and the Bush family, I find that a pretty powerful message, and I regret that it wasn’t driven harder. Instead, we see that the consequences of a self-absorbed miser taking over a town is that…it gets a bustling nightlife scene.
Yeahhh, doesn’t have quite the same impact.
I don’t see anything particularly tragic, or even unusual, about how George was nearly driven to suicide. Oftentimes all it takes is one really awful thing to send the dominoes tumbling. (I again recall how the death of one person at Nintendo turned it from an honorable, beloved consumer-friendly corporation to an open sewer of greed, abysmal quality, and ridiculous lawsuits practically overnight.) He had next to no control over any of the events of his life, his finances were never secure, and he had four children to feed (very likely all unplanned). That’s a powder keg if I ever saw one.
Do agree that it took way too long for George to catch on to Clarence showing him a world where he never existed. That level of obtuseness can’t be explained by small-town simplicity or naivete. I strongly suspect this part was padded. Which I’m not usually against in principle, but I would’ve preferred the WW2 part have gotten this treatment. The movie glossed over that way too quickly.
Also agree that there should’ve been a little more effort to explain why Mary becoming an old maid would’ve been such a bad thing. We see her walking home from work and justifiably freaking out at being accosted by a frantic stranger. That’s it? At least show a bunch of cats or something.
And of course, my big big problem is that Mr. Potter not only gets away with stealing $8,000 (I always thought Clarence’s final act should’ve been, had to have been, getting that cash back to its rightful owner [with interest, of course!
], and it was a huge letdown when that didn’t happen), he learns nothing, loses nothing, and still has an iron grip on his bank. Which is extremely problematic not just because the villain got away with it (itself all but unthinkable in the Hays Code era), but…well, when you think about it, it makes the whole movie pointless. Bailey’s S&L is still teetering on the brink, one mishap away from total collapse, and Mr. Potter is still looming in the background waiting to snap everything up. Even if he dies without realizing his ambitions, someone is going to take over his enormous assets and move in, maybe an old rival, maybe an opportunistic industry. Or maybe multiple rivals move in and it turns into a turf war. All the townsfolks’ show of generosity did was delay the inevitable.
I understand that this season is all about traditions, but this was never a good movie, it absolutely doesn’t hold up now, and I have no idea how it became THE thing to play over Christmas. Will not be watching again.