# It's amazing! (Mansplaining)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 15, 2018, 4:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564 "2018-11-15T16:24:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2018, 3:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/141 "2018-11-20T15:36:12Z")

</div>

> [@clairobscur](#):
>
> The most recent example I’ve read about was a female journalist who had been very critical of a mayor’s policies during an interview. Next time, he offered her a book about his town telling her in a clearly amused, dismissive and condescending tone that maybe she could learn a thing or two about it.

For a mansplanation grand slam, the story needs to end with her turning out to be the author of the book, a possibility that had never occurred to the mayor.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2018, 5:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/142 "2018-11-20T17:58:14Z")

</div>

> [@clairobscur](#):
>
> In this day and age, few people would assume that a woman wouldn’t know something _because she’s a woman_.

Ha ha ha _ha haa ha HA HA HA!!_

Oh my, thanks for the good laugh, dearie. 😛

Personally, I generally have quite a bit of tolerance for the annoyance of “mansplaining” because I know from personal experience that the inclination to show off one’s knowledge to other people, regardless of whether they actually need it, affects people of any gender.

However, there’s a significant difference between **natural tendency** and **cultural normalization**. And yes, there is still much more cultural normalization of men “splaining” things to women than vice versa.

Anybody who thinks that women nowadays don’t still frequently get confronted with condescending assumptions about their presumed feminine ignorance on various “unfeminine” subjects is (a) a man and (b) not a very observant man.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2018, 7:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/143 "2018-11-20T19:02:38Z")

</div>

> [@mistymage](#):
>
> Textbook mansplaining is when a man tells a female astronaut something about her trade: [Twitter User Mansplains Physics To A Female Astronaut - Good](https://www.good.is/articles/dude-manspains-in-space)

[Spontaneous](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/spontaneous):

> [@](#):
>
> Performed or occurring as a result of a sudden impulse or inclination and without premeditation or external stimulus.

The twitterer was right, the astronaut was wrong. Also, the astronaut is a [comparative physiologist](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_physiology), not a physicist. And just being an astronaut doesn’t make you infallible–for instance, Apollo astronaut James Irwin [was a moron](https://www.ozy.com/flashback/the-creationist-astronaut-who-tried-to-find-noahs-ark/72047).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Knowed\_Out](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/knowed_out/32/7380_2.png) [@Knowed\_Out](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Knowed_Out)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2018, 8:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/144 "2018-11-20T20:22:26Z")

</div>

Can mansplaining be attributed to the man hearing the woman complain and suggesting how to fix the woman’s problems, when what she really wants is someone to vent to?

Woman: I was late for my doctor’s appointment because I got stuck in traffic!  
Man: I keep telling you to take an alternate route.  
What he should have said: Oh, I’m so sorry. I bet it stressed you out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2018, 8:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/145 "2018-11-20T20:30:25Z")

</div>

A lot of people consider complaining about something without wanting a resolution “whining”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2018, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/146 "2018-11-20T20:39:23Z")

</div>

> [@Knowed\_Out](#):
>
> Can mansplaining be attributed to the man hearing the woman complain and suggesting how to fix the woman’s problems, when what she really wants is someone to vent to?
> 
> Woman: I was late for my doctor’s appointment because I got stuck in traffic!  
> Man: I keep telling you to take an alternate route.  
> What he should have said: Oh, I’m so sorry. I bet it stressed you out.

I think that is something totally different.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2018, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/147 "2018-11-20T22:44:36Z")

</div>

> [@Slash1972](#):
>
> A lot of people consider complaining about something without wanting a resolution “whining”

Wow, I hope those people manage to avoid seeing what goes on here in the BBQ Pit. Pretty much wall-to-wall complaints without wanting a resolution! And many of them initiated by men, no less!

(Hmm, but perhaps I’m overlooking the view that when **men** complain about something without wanting a resolution, especially with swearing thrown in, that’s called “ranting” and is considered more acceptable than “whining”.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![outlierrn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/outlierrn/32/3005_2.png) [@outlierrn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/outlierrn)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2018, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/148 "2018-11-20T23:01:26Z")

</div>

Mansplaining is a thing, womansplaining is a thing, people throwing either accusation as an excuse to tell someone to STFU is a thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inigo\_Montoya](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inigo_montoya/32/124_2.png) [@Inigo\_Montoya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inigo_Montoya)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2018, 11:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/149 "2018-11-20T23:12:10Z")

</div>

> [@Kimstu](#):
>
> Wow, I hope those people manage to avoid seeing what goes on here in the BBQ Pit. Pretty much wall-to-wall complaints without wanting a resolution!

Seems like the desired resolution is usually some form of STFU isn’t it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2018, 11:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/150 "2018-11-20T23:32:15Z")

</div>

Yeah, welp, I figured **manson1972** was talking about a _feasible_ resolution. I suppose you could say that, for example, yelling _“I got stuck in fucking traffic and I wish all those other cars would just get abducted by aliens!”_ counts as “wanting a resolution”, after a fashion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slash1972](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slash1972/32/6461_2.png) [@Slash1972](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slash1972)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2018, 1:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/151 "2018-11-21T01:40:57Z")

</div>

That’s a little different then “I got stuck in traffic because I didn’t take that alternate route you mentioned”

Alien abduction seems more feasible 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mistymage](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mistymage/32/459_2.png) [@mistymage](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mistymage)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2018, 4:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/152 "2018-11-21T04:40:42Z")

</div>

> [@Darren\_Garrison](#):
>
> [Spontaneous](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/spontaneous):
> 
> The twitterer was right, the astronaut was wrong. Also, the astronaut is a [comparative physiologist](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_physiology), not a physicist. And just being an astronaut doesn’t make you infallible–for instance, Apollo astronaut James Irwin [was a moron](https://www.ozy.com/flashback/the-creationist-astronaut-who-tried-to-find-noahs-ark/72047).

I would properly quote this but, no, I have despite my best efforts at mashing buttons to get a quote cascade going on this site… it has never worked.

But I will ask: Don’t you think that a (female) astronaut knew what was going to happen to set up the experiment? I mean she had to know to have it set up safely, wouldn’t you think?

Sort if like I videoed or twittered a video of me dropping an egg on a sidewalk when it’s freaking hot out, or hot water into the air when it’s freaking cold out… or maybe in close to zero-gee (I’m not an astronaut) (so I have no clue the safety stuff you have to do to video to share vs ooops, “little Adam” Schitt\*). You do voodoo… dooby do… Scooby Doo! Sorry, starting the holiday early because I can.  
\*Still disgusted by so many Trump things… just as bad as calling Warren Pocahontas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2018, 7:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/153 "2018-12-05T07:16:18Z")

</div>

> [@Intergalactic\_Gladiator](#):
>
> **catlfea12** , I don’t think you understand what mansplaining is. See, it’s when a man explains to someone else, typically a woman, in a manger regarded as condescending or patronizing.

This, but it can go even more specific. I read somewhere that the term originally arose to describe what happened on a specific occasion when the woman being mansplained to was actually the author of the definitive go-to book on the subject in question.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2018, 7:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/154 "2018-12-05T07:30:19Z")

</div>

If the OP’s relative pontificates to everyone about various topics, is it really mansplaining? I’m assuming that the context is some sort of social media setting in which she and her male relative are not the only people in the room, as it were.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spectre_of_pithecanthropus/32/12343_2.png) [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spectre_of_Pithecanthropus)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2018, 7:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/155 "2018-12-05T07:37:31Z")

</div>

There are some supposed examples of mansplaining that don’t make sense to me, like the cartoon that shows a man and woman at an art gallery and the woman saying, “I said I wonder what it means. I didn’t ask you to explain what it means.”. To me the statement “I wonder what it means” is sort of an invitation for someone to tell you what it means, at least if you are actually visiting the museum with the other person. To be fair, the man in the cartoon looked “off” and it wasn’t entirely clear that he was there with the woman, or was just a stranger who overheard her and volunteered a mansplanation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2018, 7:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/156 "2018-12-05T07:39:12Z")

</div>

> [@Intergalactic\_Gladiator](#):
>
> **catlfea12** , I don’t think you understand what mansplaining is. See, it’s when a man explains to someone else, typically a woman, in a **manger** regarded as condescending or patronizing.

Now that we’re in the Christmas season, I’ve got this vision of the baby Jesus explaining to Mary about what it’s like to give birth. 😛  
Bolding mine, of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2018, 5:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/157 "2018-12-05T17:10:46Z")

</div>

> [@mistymage](#):
>
> But I will ask: Don’t you think that a (female) astronaut knew what was going to happen to set up the experiment? I mean she had to know to have it set up safely, wouldn’t you think?
> 
> Sort if like I videoed or twittered a video of me dropping an egg on a sidewalk when it’s freaking hot out, or hot water into the air when it’s freaking cold out… or maybe in close to zero-gee (I’m not an astronaut) (so I have no clue the safety stuff you have to do to video to share vs ooops, “little Adam” Schitt\*). You do voodoo… dooby do… Scooby Doo! Sorry, starting the holiday early because I can.

Yeah, but the point is, “spontaneous” means “not caused by external conditions.” But the water boiling was caused by an external condition: the drop in pressure. Twist it around the other way, raising temperature. Would it be right to take a pot of room-temperature water, heat it above 212 degrees on a stove, and say that the water is suddenly “spontaneously boiling”? Because it is exactly the same thing. The problem wasn’t the experiment, the problem was the word choice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ChockFullOfHeadyGoodness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chockfullofheadygoodness/32/511_2.png) [@ChockFullOfHeadyGoodness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ChockFullOfHeadyGoodness)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2018, 7:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/158 "2018-12-05T19:58:58Z")

</div>

> [@VinylTurnip](#):
>
> Guess someone else had better Kool-Aid.

Well, actually, it was Flavor-Aid. You see…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Borgia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/larry_borgia/32/156_2.png) [@Larry\_Borgia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Borgia)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2018, 8:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/159 "2018-12-05T20:12:18Z")

</div>

> [@Darren\_Garrison](#):
>
> Yeah, but the point is, “spontaneous” means “not caused by external conditions.” But the water boiling was caused by an external condition: the drop in pressure. Twist it around the other way, raising temperature. Would it be right to take a pot of room-temperature water, heat it above 212 degrees on a stove, and say that the water is suddenly “spontaneously boiling”? Because it is exactly the same thing. The problem wasn’t the experiment, the problem was the word choice.

You’re not wrong, but so what? She was writing a breezy tweet–“Look at me, I’m 63,000 feet up!”–not a peer reviewed paper or a physics textbook. What kind of officious prick feels the need to point out that her informal use of a word is technically incorrect? And to compare her to a young earth creationist is beyond ridiculous.

Where does the most annoying guy at the party get his water?  
From a well, actually.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2018, 8:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564/160 "2018-12-05T20:19:26Z")

</div>

> [@Spectre\_of\_Pithecanthropus](#):
>
> There are some supposed examples of mansplaining that don’t make sense to me, like the cartoon that shows a man and woman at an art gallery and the woman saying, “I said I wonder what it means. I didn’t ask you to explain what it means.”. To me the statement “I wonder what it means” is sort of an invitation for someone to tell you what it means, at least if you are actually visiting the museum with the other person.

In an art gallery, though? ISTM that unless you’re the artist who created the artwork, you don’t really know “what it means” any more than the person who’s wondering about it does.

Wondering about the meaning of an artwork is not like, say, somebody in a hardware store saying _“I wonder why all these nail size numbers have a ‘d’ in them”_ or some other factual issue that could be objectively and informatively explained.

In this cartoon, I think the joke is supposed to be that the man is just taking it for granted that his interpretation is the correct one and it will be enlightening for his companion to have him explain it to her: i.e., the classic “mansplaining” situation.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564.md?page=7)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/its-amazing-mansplaining/824564.md?page=9)
