# James Cook memorial in Hawaii

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [April 20, 2008, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155 "2008-04-20T21:16:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dtilque](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d6d6ee/32.png) [@dtilque](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dtilque)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2008, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/1 "2008-04-20T21:16:40Z")

</div>

Years ago on a vacation in Hawaii, I was told by a tour guide that the spot Captain James Cook died has been given to the UK. I always assumed this was some kind of honorary gift and that the place is still technically under Hawaiian/US sovereignty.

Now I see the following quote in the Wikipedia entry for [James Cook](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain_James_Cook)

> [@](#):
>
> The site where he was killed in Hawaii is marked by a white obelisk and about 25 square feet of land around it is chained off. This land, though in Hawaii, has been given to the United Kingdom. Therefore, the site is officially a part of the UK.[3] With the jurisdictions reversed exactly the same sort of situation exists at Runnymede where the U.S. has extraterritorial jurisdiction over a monument to John F. Kennedy.

So was there actually an exchange of sovereignties for these two memorials or are they just honorary in some manner? Or in other words, if someone committed a crime at the Cook monument (e.g. defacing the obelisk with graffiti), would they be tried under Hawaiian or British law?

If they are an exchange of sovereignty, are there any other examples of this in the world? (Please don’t bring up embassies; they aren’t an actual exchange of sovereignty.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/earl_snake-hips_tucker/32/3269_2.png) [@Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Earl_Snake-Hips_Tucker)\
**Post date:** [April 21, 2008, 2:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/2 "2008-04-21T14:12:04Z")

</div>

I’ve read that the the cemetery at Pointe du Hoc in France is American soil, but I havent’ been able to corroborate it.

Also, the British cemetery in Ocracoke Island (NC Outer Banks–where I will be next week!) is allegedly British soil.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aldiboronti](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9fc348/32.png) [@aldiboronti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aldiboronti)\
**Post date:** [April 21, 2008, 2:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/3 "2008-04-21T14:27:08Z")

</div>

Small nitpick.

According to [this site](http://pages.quicksilver.net.nz/jcr/~cookmem.html) , listing Cook’s memorials round the world (there are a lot of them!), the actual spot where Cook was killed is marked by a plaque which is now underwater. The monument itself and small patch of British territoty is nearby on the shore.

> [@](#):
>
> Hawai’i - Kealakekua Bay - Kaawaloa - Cook’s monument (obelisk) by shore (theoretically on small patch of British soil), 1874.  
> Hawai’i - Kealakekua Bay - Kaawaloa - plaque marking location of Cook’s death (now underwater).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chefguy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chefguy/32/138_2.png) [@Chefguy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chefguy)\
**Post date:** [April 21, 2008, 3:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/4 "2008-04-21T15:00:01Z")

</div>

An excellent (and funny and true) book about Cook’s voyages is [Blue Latitudes](http://www.amazon.com/Blue-Latitudes-Boldly-Captain-Before/dp/0312422601/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1208789877&sr=1-1), in which modern day oddballs decide to retrace Cook’s journeys. They visit a lot of the memorial sites.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mycroft\_H](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/898d66/32.png) [@Mycroft\_H](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mycroft_H)\
**Post date:** [April 21, 2008, 4:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/5 "2008-04-21T16:51:58Z")

</div>

Fascinating question and thank you for the link **aldiboronti**. I would not have believed there were that many memorials to him.

My interest lies in the fact that I used to live in England in Marton, near where Cook was born, and went to school in Great Ayton, the same town where he went to school. On my one trip to Hawaii we got close to the spot where he died, but ran out of time and had to turn around to get back to the airport before we managed to reach the spot. I thought it would make an interesting bookend-like experience.

I will resist a full scale excursion like the guy in the book referenced by **Chefguy** , although the book might be interesting to read. Thanks as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Xema](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/9de053/32.png) [@Xema](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Xema)\
**Post date:** [April 21, 2008, 5:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/6 "2008-04-21T17:19:00Z")

</div>

FWIW, I have been to the Cook Memorial at Kealakekua Bay, and it’s just as described by aldiboronti. The spot is not especially easy to reach - you either have to hike a couple of miles downhill (and then up again), or take a boat (or swim) a mile across the bay. But it is beautiful, not heavily visited and has about the best snorkeling on the Big Island.

(True confession: we actually drove our rental car down the hiking trail. You do NOT want to do this.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skammer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skammer/32/143_2.png) [@Skammer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skammer)\
**Post date:** [April 21, 2008, 6:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/7 "2008-04-21T18:09:40Z")

</div>

Off-topic, but my dad’s great-grandmother’s maiden name was Cook, and growing up, everyone knew that she was Captain Cook’s great-grandaughter. It was common knowledge in our family.

About ten years ago I decided to do some genealogy, and traced her family back to the point they had arrived in Canada from England in the 1800’s. Then I decided to work the other way, figuring it would be easier to start with the famous Captain and work forward. So that’s when I found out what some of you probably already know: none of his children had children of their own. He has no living descendants.

I told my dad but we agreed to let his mother live in ignorance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhendo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mhendo/32/3159_2.png) [@mhendo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mhendo)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2008, 5:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/8 "2008-04-22T05:33:34Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Mycroft H.]  
I will resist a full scale excursion like the guy in the book referenced by **Chefguy** , although the book might be interesting to read.  
[/QUOTE]  
Absolutely. The author is Tony Horwitz, who also wrote the sensational _Confederates in the Attic_. He has a real knack for getting at the heart of strange cultural practices, and is an excellent writer. _Blue Latitudes_ isn’t as great as the earlier book, but is still a very nice read.

As for the OP’s question about the issue of sovereignty and its legal implications, a good place to start might be the following short journal article:

**John Wesley Coulter, “Great Britain in Hawaii: The Captain Cook Monument,” _The Geographical Journal_, Vol. 130, No. 2, (Jun., 1964), pp. 256-261.**

If you have access to the JSTOR journal database through a library or university, you can download the article [here](http://www.jstor.org/stable/1794586). If you don’t, that link will only take you to a login page.

Anyway, Coulter spends a few pages talking about the significance of British influence in Hawai’i, and then discusses the circumstances in which the monument site came to be handed over. First:

> [@](#):
>
> The site on which Captain Cook’s monument was erected in I874 was presented to the British Consul in January I877 by Archibald Cleghorn and his wife, Princess Likelike, sister of King Kalakaua.

After reprinting a transcript of the deed of conveyance, Coulter notes an “interesting anomaly.” The deed itself did not deed the land directly to Britain, but to the British Consul General, Major James Hay Wodehouse.

In 1939, the British Foreign Office realized that, as a result of the wording of the deed, the title to the land was owned not by Great Britain, but by Ernest H. Wodehouse, a descendant of the Consul. Wodehouse agreed to deed the land to Britain for one dollar. Coulter reproduces two newspaper articles from January, 1939, describing the transfer.

As far as the legal standing of the land goes, Coulter has more questions than answers.

> [@](#):
>
> Interesting questions in international law would appear to be involved in connection with the deed of cession and its acceptance by the British Government. Since the land was held in trust for the purpose designated, but had not actually passed over to Great Britain when the islands were annexed by the United States in I898, did this piece of land also pass over to the United States? Did Ernest H. Wodehouse, an American citizen, have the right in 1939 to hand over this area to another sovereign power, Great Britain? Did the formal transfer of the property to Great Britain in 1939 annul any claim of the United States to the 631 square yards? These questions, of course, are for the moment merely of academic interest, and others, equally academic, could be adduced: since the land is on the coast, the shoreward side washed by the tides, does Great Britain have dominium over the adjoining waters for 7 miles out to sea ? But more important potentially, perhaps, are questions regarding jurisdiction if a crime should be committed in the ground of the monument, or if someone should flee from the State of Hawaii to that area to escape.[sup]1[/sup]

Coulter, in writing his article, had some correspondence with Ralph S. Kuykendall, an Emeritus Professor History at the University of Hawai’i. He also contacted a geography and law specialist from the Library of Congress. Coulter says, in the footnote to the previous quoted paragraph:

> [@](#):
>
> 1. Kuykendall writes: 'I cannot see any ground for questions of international law being involved. The deed was executed, not by the government, but by private landowners, who certainly had no rights of sovereignty…with respect to this land, it appears to me that the British government stands on the same footing as any private, fee simple landowner. It is also to be observed that the land was granted for a specific, limited purpose ‘and for none other’.
> 
> John Kerr Rose, a specialist in geography and law in the Legislative Reference Service of the Library of Congress of the United States in a personal letter to the author states: ‘There probably isn’t much chance of having another offshore oil squabble thereabouts, but its not at all impossible to have a murder in the monument grounds. Or a sailor, either one of our own citizens, or a visiting national of another country, or to keep it less complicated, one of the civilian students might rape a girl in the area,-what then ? The defense would bring several of these matters to a less academic status very promptly!’

That’s all i could find on the subject.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bluezooky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e8c25b/32.png) [@bluezooky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bluezooky)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2008, 6:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/9 "2008-04-22T06:00:11Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=dtilque]

If they are an exchange of sovereignty, are there any other examples of this in the world? (Please don’t bring up embassies; they aren’t an actual exchange of sovereignty.)  
[/QUOTE]

The monument to the navigator [La Pérouse](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Perouse,_New_South_Wales) who arrived in Australia the same day as the first fleet been given in perpetuity to France.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dtilque](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d6d6ee/32.png) [@dtilque](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dtilque)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2008, 6:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/10 "2008-04-22T06:58:06Z")

</div>

Thanks, mhendo. It looks to me like Professor Kuykendall has the answer. It’s owned by the British government but not as a sovereign part of the UK. But that’s just his opinion. No doubt if a crime ever were committed on the site, the defence attorney will bring up the international aspect and then the courts will rule on its status.

I suspect the other suggested extralities (cemetaries and monument to La Pérouse) also don’t actually involve transfers of sovereignty but just simple ownership. However, I’d never heard of La Pérouse, so thanks to bluezooky for bringing him to my attention.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ataraxy22](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ataraxy22/32/307_2.png) [@ataraxy22](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ataraxy22)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2008, 7:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/11 "2008-04-22T07:04:08Z")

</div>

a few relevant pictures from Flickr (not mine):

[one](http://www.flickr.com/photos/pmforster/225874014/)  
[two](http://www.flickr.com/photos/raschi/91049352/)  
[three](http://www.flickr.com/photos/stechico/213000080/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Great\_Dave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/46a35a/32.png) [@Great\_Dave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Great_Dave)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2008, 6:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/12 "2008-04-22T18:01:29Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Chefguy]  
An excellent (and funny and true) book about Cook’s voyages is [Blue Latitudes](http://www.amazon.com/Blue-Latitudes-Boldly-Captain-Before/dp/0312422601/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1208789877&sr=1-1), in which modern day oddballs decide to retrace Cook’s journeys. They visit a lot of the memorial sites.  
[/QUOTE]

Very interesting book. I picked it up about 5 years ago in the Oakland airport- someone had apparently finished it and left it for me to find. Cook was one of the first to see Antarctica and Alaska, and had a tremendous ability to eat just about anything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Xema](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/9de053/32.png) [@Xema](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Xema)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2008, 8:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/13 "2008-04-22T20:42:20Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Great Dave]  
Cook was one of the first to see Antarctica and Alaska…  
[/QUOTE]

He certainly saw Alaska, but my understanding was that he narrowly missed seeing Antarctica. He did explore southern latitudes enough to show that if there was a southern continent, none of it extended far enough north to be inhabitable. (A “great southern continent” with a land mass sufficient to “balance” the known land area of the northern hemisphere was a popular theory of the time. Cook’s voyages knocked that on the head.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![squeegee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/squeegee/32/14537_2.png) [@squeegee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/squeegee)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2008, 9:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/14 "2008-04-22T21:52:15Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=aldiboronti]  
The actual spot where Cook was killed is marked by a plaque which is now underwater.  
[/quote]  
Why is it under water? Did the sea level rise, or did the island sink? I know the Big Island (and maybe others) is subsiding, as seen by old frost lines on the big volcanoes, although I don’t know the rate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Great\_Dave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/46a35a/32.png) [@Great\_Dave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Great_Dave)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2008, 2:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/15 "2008-04-23T14:10:15Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=squeegee]  
Why is it under water? Did the sea level rise, or did the island sink? I know the Big Island (and maybe others) is subsiding, as seen by old frost lines on the big volcanoes, although I don’t know the rate.  
[/QUOTE]

Wasn’t he killed in the surf?

> [@Xema](#):
>
> [Quote=Great Dave]
> 
> Cook was one of the first to see Antarctica and Alaska…

He certainly saw Alaska, but my understanding was that he narrowly missed seeing Antarctica. He did explore southern latitudes enough to show that if there was a southern continent, none of it extended far enough north to be inhabitable. (A “great southern continent” with a land mass sufficient to “balance” the known land area of the northern hemisphere was a popular theory of the time. Cook’s voyages knocked that on the head.)  
[/quote]

You may be right. I believe that he was the first to make it to 77\* South and North. He also thought that walrus made a fine beef, even as most of his crew was retching.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zebra](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/c0e974/32.png) [@Zebra](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zebra)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2008, 3:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/james-cook-memorial-in-hawaii/446155/16 "2008-04-23T15:27:49Z")

</div>

Another great book to read about Cook and Hawaii and \*The Curse of Lono \* by Hunter S. Thompson. It goes into Cooks time in Hawaii quite a bit.
