It seems to me that you would be more properly employed as a chimney sweep, or maybe a newsie.
[QUOTE=flurb]
It seems to me that you would be more properly employed as a chimney sweep, or maybe a newsie.
[/QUOTE]
Well, we haven’t determined if he’s plucky yet. Surely you’ll concede that in order to do those jobs with any degree of literary consanguinuity, he must be plucky.
[QUOTE=Bricker]
Well, we haven’t determined if he’s plucky yet. Surely you’ll concede that in order to do those jobs with any degree of literary consanguinuity, he must be plucky.
[/QUOTE]
Alternatively he could also be plucky or spunky, although people with the latter trait often find successful careers in quite a different area of work.
[QUOTE=flurb]
It seems to me that you would be more properly employed as a chimney sweep, or maybe a newsie.
[/QUOTE]
You forgot shoe-shiner.
[QUOTE=Bricker]
Well, we haven’t determined if he’s plucky yet. Surely you’ll concede that in order to do those jobs with any degree of literary consanguinuity, he must be plucky.
[/QUOTE]
He would also need to exhibit a lot of gumption. And a little bit of moxie.
Asked and answered. Closed. samclem