Well I can tell you that, at least for New Zealand
"In particular, freedom of expression is preserved in section 14 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (BORA) which states that: "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression, including the right to seek, receive, and impart information and opinions of any kind in any form ".
Right - a “quick” google shows that. Lots of countries claim to have free speech, then carve out all sorts of exceptions to render it meaningless. Take the time to drill down and find out what’s what. Good try though.
The problem with the government controlling ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’ is that they are the main purveyors of it, and are not to be trusted as gatekeepers in any way. They are lying liars who lie - all of them. Demanding that they be the arbiters of truth is incredibly dangerous.
Or ask yourselves - how would you feel about the government regulating speech if Donald Trump,is president? Do you trust that they’ll give YOUR ideas a fair shake before censoring them if they don’t like them?
As for ‘reasonable limits’ on speech, the problem there is that the speech that most needs protecting is speech that the establishment doesn’t like. Carving out exceptions for ‘misinformation’ will just get everything they don’t like classed as misinformation.
For example, suggesting a lab leak origin for Covid got you banned from social media if you suggested it early in the pandemic because the government flagged it as ‘dangerous misinformation’ even though it’s pretty clear now that it was true, and they almost certainly knew it at the time.
The same goes for the ‘Russian disinformation’ claim for the Hunter Biden laptop and all kinds of other stuff that was passed off as ‘disinformation’ by the government but later turned out to be true.
Everyone ahould be free to say what they want, short of yelling fire in a crowded theater. The proper answer to bad speech is good speech, Gagging people never makes things better.
Right. I’m fundamentally against the idea that the government should be the arbiters of what’s true or untrue.
That said, if every example of speech that was stifled on social media was unmitigated bullshit, as seems to be the case, while government mouthpieces deliver evidence-based information, well… let’s just say that we’re pretty far off from an Orwellian nightmare.
Interesting, given that I can find lots on the social media I consume assuring me that a lab leak origin for Covid is nonsense since Covid is a government, psyop, plandemic, conspiracy, by them (Jews), to depopulate the planet our beautiful flat Earth.
Does New. Zealand explicitly guarantee it in common law? Does it hold the force of law, or is it just kind of a nice thing to have they wrote down somewhere, until the government decides they really aren’t that into you any longer?
This is what I’m getting at. New Zealand is even arguably civilized, at least until recently. I’m not sure the US qualifies. Australia has no protections. Canada? Not in practice. UK? No. Germany? No. I just took issue with the statement, free speech is something that is easy to pay lip service to, and see it getting trampled all over the place routinely.
It isn’t surprising to see America ranked poorly, but then I can’t think of any notable outpost of free speech right now, especially any of the so-called “civilized” countries.
Don’t forget this part. This part is also bullshit. Where are you getting your information on the lab leak theory Sam? Same place you got your information on when the Omicron variant emerged?
The government suggesting to a social media company that some posters are violating the company’s own terms of service is not the government controlling information.
And a government forcing a social media company keep posters who violate terms of services would be an unconstitutional restriction on the company’s right to free speech.