# Jury Duty: Tips for not getting selected for a trial

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [May 15, 2012, 12:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982 "2012-05-15T12:48:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spiff](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spiff/32/9852_2.png) [@Spiff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spiff)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 6:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/41 "2012-05-15T18:13:07Z")

</div>

If I ever get called, I will respond to each and every question asked of me with: “My name is [my real name] and I refuse to participate in this racist institution.”

Because that’s what I believe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Max\_Torque](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e9bcb4/32.png) [@Max\_Torque](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Max_Torque)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 6:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/42 "2012-05-15T18:17:03Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Scientists (who are generally logical thinkers) simply do not get picked, at least around here. In over ten years in a department with about a hundred faculty and grad students, not one of us has actually served on a jury.
> 
> Personally, the one time I was called, I didn’t even _try_ to get out of it. I consider jury duty to be a great privilege. But no, they don’t want me.

One problem we’ve encountered is that TV seems to have “trained” jurors to expect scientific evidence in every case, and if they don’t get it, they’ll let the guy walk. Doesn’t matter if the convenience store clerk knew the robber, coached him in Little League, and recognizes his car; if there weren’t fingerprints and DNA, there’ll be no conviction.

Okay, slight exaggeration, but still.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 6:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/43 "2012-05-15T18:25:23Z")

</div>

I really hate dicussions like this. Everyone loses when the only ones on a jury are those that are too stupid to get out of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lost4life](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/c4cdca/32.png) [@lost4life](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lost4life)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 7:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/44 "2012-05-15T19:08:10Z")

</div>

If a judge determines you are intentionally screwing around to get out of jury duty, can you be found in contempt?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![markdash](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@markdash](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/markdash)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 7:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/45 "2012-05-15T19:14:40Z")

</div>

> [@Spiff](#):
>
> If I ever get called, I will respond to each and every question asked of me with: “My name is [my real name] and I refuse to participate in this racist institution.”
> 
> Because that’s what I believe.

You’ve posted this before in another thread, haven’t you?

Anyway, good job helping to make the system a little less racist. Oh wait.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 7:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/46 "2012-05-15T19:31:05Z")

</div>

> [@markdash](#):
>
> Anyway, good job helping to make the system a little less racist. Oh wait.

And just try telling the judge that you love the institutionalized racism of the legal system and are looking forward to your chance to participate in it.

What do you mean I’m dismissed? I said I want to be here!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/9de053/32.png) [@Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackknifed_Juggernaut)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 8:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/47 "2012-05-15T20:20:30Z")

</div>

I’ve been relieved of my juror duties. One day. Three years off. Well worth it. And I didn’t even have to use any of these suggestions!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Max\_Torque](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e9bcb4/32.png) [@Max\_Torque](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Max_Torque)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 8:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/48 "2012-05-15T20:36:34Z")

</div>

> [@lost4life](#):
>
> If a judge determines you are intentionally screwing around to get out of jury duty, can you be found in contempt?

Sure; contempt is one of those magic bullets that’s always in the judge’s pocket.

You’re put under oath at the start of voir dire. If the court determines that you’re not answering the questions honestly, you could be charged with perjury as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jharvey963](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/54ee81/32.png) [@jharvey963](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jharvey963)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/49 "2012-05-15T21:18:44Z")

</div>

I would actually like to serve in a jury. I think it would be a fascinating (and also probably boring) experience. Alas, I’ve never even been called in to the courtroom to be questioned.

Anyway, I’ve thought of a couple of ways to get out of jury duty if you really want to.

One way: If asked if you think you could uphold the law (or however they phrase it) say “I believe that a trial is meant to do justice, and I intend to do that. The law is only an approximation of justice. If the law is in direct conflict with what I feel to be justice in this case, I will come down on the side of justice, not the law.”

Another way: This was actually related to an auditorium full of people by Neil DeGrasse Tyson. When being questioned for jury duty and asked about eyewitness testimony, he stated that he had run workshops on the unreliability of eyewitness testimony. Not only was he excused, but the entire courtroom full of prospective jurors was excused because he had “poisoned the well”. 🙂

J.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 9:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/50 "2012-05-15T21:26:31Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Scientists (who are generally logical thinkers) simply do not get picked, at least around here. In over ten years in a department with about a hundred faculty and grad students, not one of us has actually served on a jury.
> 
> Personally, the one time I was called, I didn’t even _try_ to get out of it. I consider jury duty to be a great privilege. But no, they don’t want me.

I can assure you that around Silicon Valley being an engineer/scientist in no way gets you off, having been picked twice and getting to the final stage of a murder trial, where they filled the jury before my number came up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 9:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/51 "2012-05-15T21:33:29Z")

</div>

> [@Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](#):
>
> Here’s what I plan on telling the next judge:
> 
> I certainly respect the important role of a jury in society. But I believe that the process is very flawed in the US, and probably leads to many incorrect decisions. All types of behavioral and psychological interactions are happening between the jurors during deliberation. These likely lead to many incorrect decisions. If these did not occur, it would be very difficult to arrive at a unanimous verdict amongst 12 people. I think a better process would be to disallow any discussion or interaction amongst jurors and then let majority vote determine guilt or innocence.

And the judge will answer “cite?”  
Hate to break it to you, but judges are well aware of the psychological component of juries, having been attorneys. When I was the foreman of the jury I was on the judge suggested that I poll people’s opinions before having the first vote, since people tend to lock themselves into the position they voted for, but might be more easily swayed by hearing the arguments of the other jurors. It worked. We were 11-1 for conviction at the first ballot, and the lone holdout changed his mind pretty quickly. Talking to the lawyers after we convicted, I discovered information not revealed at the trial which convinced me even further that we made the right decision.  
I doubt your solution would lead to more correct decisions. Anyhow, I’m willing to go with about 1,000 years of common law experience.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saint\_Cad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saint_cad/32/18907_2.png) [@Saint\_Cad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saint_Cad)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/52 "2012-05-15T21:39:24Z")

</div>

> [@silenus](#):
>
> Last time I got bounced for being a debate coach. Not a whole lot of help for you, unfortunately.

And I got bounced for telling the defense that I am a mathematician and could be impartial and make decisions based solely on the facts.  
Interesting how attorneys don’t want people familiar with logic on juries.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 9:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/53 "2012-05-15T21:59:12Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> I can assure you that around Silicon Valley being an engineer/scientist in no way gets you off, having been picked twice and getting to the final stage of a murder trial, where they filled the jury before my number came up.

Santa Barbara is similar. I was one of four engineers on a jury (three active, one retired.) Of the twelve jurors plus two alternates, thirteen had college degrees and at least three had graduate degrees.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spiff](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spiff/32/9852_2.png) [@Spiff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spiff)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/54 "2012-05-15T22:00:21Z")

</div>

> [@markdash](#):
>
> You’ve posted this before in another thread, haven’t you?

Yes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 10:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/55 "2012-05-15T22:02:00Z")

</div>

> [@Saint\_Cad](#):
>
> And I got bounced for telling the defense that I am a mathematician and could be impartial and make decisions based solely on the facts.  
> Interesting how attorneys don’t want people familiar with logic on juries.

:rolleyes:

After the my jury experience, a few of us stayed behind at the request of the attorneys. Both the prosecutor and the ADA told me that they like engineers on juries because they make logical decisions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saint\_Cad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saint_cad/32/18907_2.png) [@Saint\_Cad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saint_Cad)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/56 "2012-05-15T22:28:39Z")

</div>

> [@hajario](#):
>
> :rolleyes:
> 
> After the my jury experience, a few of us stayed behind at the request of the attorneys. Both the prosecutor and the ADA told me that they like engineers on juries because they make logical decisions.

I should have been clearer defense attorneys don’t like logicians.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/57 "2012-05-15T22:36:28Z")

</div>

> [@Saint\_Cad](#):
>
> I should have been clearer defense attorneys don’t like logicians.

Actually, I should have been clearer. I meant to say PD instead of ADA.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ioioio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ioioio/32/316_2.png) [@ioioio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ioioio)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 10:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/58 "2012-05-15T22:49:29Z")

</div>

If your system assigns juror numbers and you get a high one, say over 100, you’re unlikely to make the cut. Over 200 – not a chance.

My favorite culled candidates were:

1. The man who was appearing before the same judge on a felony charge in two weeks.
2. The woman who was an activist (and a loud obnoxious one) in some anti-prison group.

Every time I’ve been in the pool, the final question has been if we could convict someone for violating a law we don’t agree with. I could not, but didn’t bother to step forward since I already knew my number was too high.

Rather than trying to outsmart the system, which may result in wasting other people’s time, I suggest that you call the court office and tell them you have a work conflict. They may excuse you on the spot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Digital\_is\_the\_new\_Analog](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a88e4f/32.png) [@Digital\_is\_the\_new\_Analog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Digital_is_the_new_Analog)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 11:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/59 "2012-05-15T23:21:32Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> The irony is that I’m retired and I have plenty of time on my hands. You want me to serve on a jury? Hey, sounds like fun. Lets do this.
> 
> But the only two times I’ve been called up for jury duty, the trial was dismissed before it even got started and I was released.

In some locations, you can volunteer to be on jury duty if you haven’t served recently.

I’ve been called for jury duty four or five times..been selected twice. One of those two was settled before we heard any testimony.

The last one was interesting. It was part of a much larger case - we could tell that there were things not being presented to us. Lots of sidebar discussions on what they could talk about. It ended up in a mistrial after three days.

A handful of us were hanging out in the hallway afterwards, chatting with the lawyers. The judge came by and asked if we were willing to unofficially continue. Apparently, this was the second mistrial..and the judge thought that if the lawyers heard our feedback after getting the evidence, it might help them settle the case. Or at least go smoother the next time.

So we went back into the courtroom and listened for an extra hour. It was funny how much was almost choreographed. One of the lawyers said “I would have presented this evidence. The plaintiff’s lawyer would then object, and I’d change it to this.”

After all that, we got to ask questions about the process, and about the parts of the case they didn’t tell us about up front.

All in all..a good experience. I’d do it again.

-D/a

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Find\_Friends](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/c37758/32.png) [@Find\_Friends](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Find_Friends)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2012, 11:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982/60 "2012-05-15T23:30:58Z")

</div>

> [@ThelmaLou](#):
>
> Do not fail to show up. Big mistake.
> 
> But when the lawyers question you, be very opinionated. Especially about the topic of the trial. They want jurors who are blank slates, open-minded, malleable, reasonable. Be dogmatic and inflexible, but NOT nasty or rude.
> 
> For example, I was in a group to be interviewed for a jury. It was a DWI case. When the lawyer asked me, “How do you feel about current penalties for DWI?” I said, “They’re not nearly strong enough. They should lock those people up and throw away the key.” I WANTED to be selected for the jury because I DO feel strongly about DWI. That answer got me excused so fast your head would spin.
> 
> Another juror was excused because he owned a liquor store.
> 
> I’m not suggesting you lie when you’re questioned, but search inside yourself and find some strong opinion that you already have about the trial subject and express it enthusiastically. Do not come across as neutral and reasonable. Neutral and reasonable is what they’re looking for.

Recently we heard from the leader of our local philosophy group about his good-faith answers to the screening questions and how they excused him in fairly short time. I’m having a hard time just now remembering most of what he had said, although it was just two weeks ago. But I think it fits in pretty well with your analysis.

The definition of “reasonable” that they seem to use strikes me as very phony. Here “reasonable” implies that one could be easily led. “Open-minded” means to the point of having holes in your head. _ **- “Jack”** _

ETA: It was a civil suit involving maintenance negligence leading to an allegedly preventable injury from a fall.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/jury-duty-tips-for-not-getting-selected-for-a-trial/621982.md?page=4)
