Just read Starship Troopers for the first time.

I don’t think that word means what you think it means.

Well, it was very bright, especially in the scenes on the second planet (well, third, counting Earth)

I don’t take either of those as canon because Verhoeven was not involved. Thanks anyway.

Douglas Adams in “Starship Titanic” takes this a step further (Written by Eric Idle, I think.). It features a sentient bomb doing its own countdown, but being easily distracted by conversation and thereby losing track, so having to start over again. Repeatedly.

Terry Jones, IIRC, with the agreement that he could write naked.

There’s a talking, reasoning bomb - big enough to blow up a planet - in the low-budget sf movie Dark Star, too.

Talk to it about epistomology

Sorry, I missed this and was just reminded about this thread.

I don’t think he’s physically capable of subtle. :wink:

Okay, but even if we take all of that as true, the actual events of the film still don’t match the proposed narrative (I’d wager, due to Verhoeven’s tiny monkey-brain that couldn’t even get through the book Starship Troopers, anyways). Even if all of that is true: a handfull of humans defied official human policy, they settled on a planet that had bugs on it and then went all Mengele on them so that’s fair play when the bugs exterminate them… but then the bugs pretty much nuke BA from orbit. At this point, a human military response is anything but fascist.

If Verhoeven wanted to show a fascist society that was going to extremes, then having Earth attacked from orbit, causing millions of civilian casualties, before any military campaign was begun by Earth is just counterproductive.

Yeah, but the story that’s (maybe) actually told is about 300 rogue humans who do something bad and then Earth itself is subjected to a genocidal attack, after which point the humans go on a war footing.

Well I certainly don’t want to be the one arguing that Verhoeven is a good director, or that Starship Troopers is a good movie.

I accept your point about the Bugs dropping a rock on Buenos Aires is a bad way to show that the humans are being fascist or overreacting. I suspect on that point he was hampered by the fact that Heinlein wasn’t a fascist, and so wrote the story where the humans were justified in responding to the genocidal attack of the Arachnids. Thus, Verhoeven/writer* is attempting to make the society fascist, but hampered by the details of the story he is abusing not actually showing that. Thus he tries to convey his message with the characterization and feel rather than the actual incident description.

But that’s just a guess. It’s just it fits. Just like the scene where the recruits hit basic and Sargeant Zim breaks a guy’s arm. That scene was technically in the book - but not the way Verhoeven directs it. In the movie, it is a deliberate act of malice to break the arm after the opponent is subdued. In the text of the novel, two closely matched opponents engage in a full contact exchange and the recruit gets bested, which incidentally results in the arm breaking, and Zim isn’t happy about that. Verhoeven took the source material, but twisted it to fit his own agenda. I think the attack scene is the same thing. Verhoeven took the existing story description, but tried to twist the presentation to fit his own agenda. Whether he was successful or not is, I guess, a matter of opinion.


*Whatever the writer’s name was. I used it earlier in the thread but didn’t commit it to memory, and don’t care to look it up.

Sounds decent enough, I suppose. But I’d argue that at the end of the day (and the beginning too), while Verhoeven and/or his writer/homunculus may have wanted to tell a story about imperialistic, fascistic aggressive human expansion and the propaganda that they used to sell their invasion of bug space, instead we got an incoherent mess with some propaganda-esque video clips and an overarching narrative in which 300 humans may have done some shitty stuff and then the bugs embark on a war of genocide against the human homeworld and the humans defend themselves.

I think you’re right. My edition has a photograph of him with a typewriter strategically placed in his lap.