# Kaine = Hillary Thinks She's Gonna Win By a Landslide

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [July 24, 2016, 1:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738 "2016-07-24T01:48:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GunnarFranz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/da6949/32.png) [@GunnarFranz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GunnarFranz)\
**Post date:** [July 26, 2016, 11:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/101 "2016-07-26T11:14:13Z")

</div>

I don’t think the VP pick needs to or should be a spectacle considering most studies show it makes little difference. Personally I don’t mind Kaine, it certainly isn’t going to make me vote for Hillary but he seems reasonably capable, probably more so than either of the names up-ballot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [July 26, 2016, 3:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/102 "2016-07-26T15:17:34Z")

</div>

You can select someone as your running mate who (1) you think will help you win the election, or (2) you think will be helpful to you once you’re in the White House. Bush picked Cheney under option (2); Obama picked Biden for both options (1) and (2). I think Hillary has done the same with Kaine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [July 30, 2016, 9:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/103 "2016-07-30T21:25:13Z")

</div>

Just wanted to update this thread with the reminder than those who live by the nowcast die by the nowcast, i.e. that looking at polls after one convention but not the other will invariably give a slanted result if straight-line extrapolated.

Nate Silver’s [nowcast](http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#now)now (5pm 7/30) has Clinton with an over 50% chance of winning. There will be a number of major polls released over the next day or two. Those undoubtedly will continue the swing back that has already started to appear. Nothing in Silver’s columns have given much hope for Trump supporters, but [Silver himself](http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/post-democratic-convention-2016-election/) is waiting to see whether a true bounce will occur and if so how large that will be, which is the proper stance for him to take.

He doesn’t, however, mention that Clinton now has three months without opposition, during which Sanders and Warren and every other progressive whose head is not three inches above their shoulders will be working to convince progressives to vote for Clinton or at least against Trump. That alone should contribute to her percentages above and beyond everything else.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [July 30, 2016, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/104 "2016-07-30T23:11:58Z")

</div>

BTW, [Slate reports](http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/07/30/bipartisan_polling_firm_shows_clinton_has_significant_lead_over_trump.html) that the first poll released since the DNC has Clinton with a 15 point lead. My point is that I don’t believe that either, and don’t care.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leaper](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/4bbf92/32.png) [@Leaper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leaper)\
**Post date:** [July 30, 2016, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/105 "2016-07-30T23:29:40Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> He doesn’t, however, mention that Clinton now has three months without opposition, during which Sanders and Warren and every other progressive whose head is not three inches above their shoulders will be working to convince progressives to vote for Clinton or at least against Trump. That alone should contribute to her percentages above and beyond everything else.

I think I know what you’re referring to here, but just in case: what do you mean she has three months without opposition?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [July 30, 2016, 11:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/106 "2016-07-30T23:37:07Z")

</div>

She only has to worry about what is in front of her, not behind her back.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2016, 12:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/107 "2016-07-31T00:09:46Z")

</div>

She has \*always \*had to worry about who and what’s behind her back. Because there’s always \*been \*somebody there, trying to knife her. If she seems overcautious, which she does, she has good reason to be.

Three months without opposition may mean Trump is going to take that long to get an effective campaign organized, if indeed he ever does. He still hasn’t run one damn TV ad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2016, 12:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/108 "2016-07-31T00:17:33Z")

</div>

> [@Leaper](#):
>
> I think I know what you’re referring to here, but just in case: what do you mean she has three months without opposition?

Without Democratic opposition.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DonLogan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/51bf81/32.png) [@DonLogan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DonLogan)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2016, 1:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/109 "2016-07-31T01:13:41Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> BTW, [Slate reports](http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/07/30/bipartisan_polling_firm_shows_clinton_has_significant_lead_over_trump.html) that the first poll released since the DNC has Clinton with a 15 point lead. My point is that I don’t believe that either, and don’t care.

Lol, from the Slate article:  
\*\*\*For its reliability, we turn, as ever, to Nate Silver.

```
@dandrezner: They're new-ish so don't know much about em. They polled the Missouri primary and did fine; hadn't heard of them before that.
— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) July 30, 2016***

```

From the front page of the RABA website:  
_**Featured in media outlets such as NBC News, Politico and [FiveThirtyEight.com](http://FiveThirtyEight.com).**_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aag3981](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/53a042/32.png) [@aag3981](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aag3981)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2016, 4:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/110 "2016-07-31T04:04:28Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> Why? I keep hearing that these politicians evolve the same way people do, but it’s interesting how they always, 100% of the time, evolve in the direction they need to to win. It’s a lot more likely that Kaine was always moderate left, but played centrist because that was the role he needed to play to win in Virginia at the time.

Is it that odd though? It seems in many issues, like gay rights or gun control, general public views have changed. Politicians are part of the general public too.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2016, 4:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/111 "2016-07-31T04:11:28Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> …Nate Silver’s [nowcast](http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#now)now (5pm 7/30) has Clinton with an over 50% chance of winning…

Didn’t he have her at a 70% chance of winning just a few weeks ago? This isn’t too reassuring.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2016, 5:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/112 "2016-07-31T05:49:30Z")

</div>

> [@ElvisL1ves](#):
>
> …He still hasn’t run one damn TV ad.

They run ads on TV so people talk about them. Why would he bother?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2016, 8:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/113 "2016-07-31T08:05:59Z")

</div>

> [@aag3981](#):
>
> Is it that odd though? It seems in many issues, like gay rights or gun control, general public views have changed. Politicians are part of the general public too.
> 
> Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk

I’d note that Tim Kaine is also now against TPP, despite being for it a few months ago.

Of course, when elected, both Clinton and Kaine will magically flip back on that one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2016, 3:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/114 "2016-07-31T15:08:27Z")

</div>

> [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](#):
>
> Didn’t he have her at a 70% chance of winning just a few weeks ago? This isn’t too reassuring.

I was responding specifically to Corry El who made numerous remarks about Trump’s possibilities when he was at a high before the Democratic convention. However, Silver’s nowcast also sparked [another thread](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=799384) when Trump went into positive territory.

Overnight, the new after-the-convention polls have put Clinton up another 5 points to 56.8%. Six days ago, the nowcast showed Trump with a 57.5% chance. The swing was expected by everybody but it became useful propaganda for those few days.

This is not inherently a flaw of the nowcast for those who understand it. However, it’s a device so easily and deliberately misused that I hope he discontinues it for future elections.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2016, 6:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/115 "2016-08-01T18:02:23Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> I’d note that Tim Kaine is also now against TPP, despite being for it a few months ago.
> 
> Of course, when elected, both Clinton and Kaine will magically flip back on that one.

The TPP keeps changing so why shouldn’t peoples views on it? It was supposed to contain measures that would crack down on nations that manipulate currency, and the negotiations have been super-secret and ongoing. It’s not the same agreement from 2005, having been changed and watered down. It has some good points, but since it wont contain China much anymore, it’s not worth it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2016, 1:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/116 "2016-08-02T01:59:10Z")

</div>

> [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](#):
>
> Didn’t he have her at a 70% chance of winning just a few weeks ago? This isn’t too reassuring.

Feel reassured. The nowcast is up to 82%.

You should remember all the people who made forecasts after just one convention and downgrade their future comments accordingly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2016, 4:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/117 "2016-08-02T04:05:14Z")

</div>

I wouldn’t have expected that much volatility in those numbers. I thought it’s about the long view and what’s supposed to happen on Election Day, as best he can determine, and not just a reflection of the ups and downs of daily or weekly polling.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2016, 4:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/118 "2016-08-02T04:10:45Z")

</div>

> [@ElvisL1ves](#):
>
> Three months without opposition may mean Trump is going to take that long to get an effective campaign organized, if indeed he ever does. He still hasn’t run one damn TV ad.

He gets an entire network for free.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![choie](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/choie/32/7829_2.png) [@choie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/choie)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2016, 5:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/119 "2016-08-02T05:01:34Z")

</div>

> [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](#):
>
> I wouldn’t have expected that much volatility in those numbers. I thought it’s about the long view and what’s supposed to happen on Election Day, as best he can determine, and not just a reflection of the ups and downs of daily or weekly polling.

It’s about both. When people cite poll numbers from 538, I think it’ll be helpful to specify which of the three forecasts we’re talking about. There are three:

1. The **nowcast** , which is where the 82% figure comes from. This is “likelihood of whether the candidate will win if the election were held _right now._” This can and usually does change multiple times a day.

(Nate Silver describes the nowcast as being ADHD. 😃 For example, this morning the figures were at 61% Clinton, 39% Trump. This kept shifting the [del]more egregiously offensive Trump got[/del] more information became available. And now it’s a kind of crazy 83.8% Clinton, 16.2% Trump.)

1. The **polls-only** forecast, which is what it says: a prediction for Nov. 8 based on current polling only. It changes only when new polls come in, which could be once or twice on one day, then nothing for another couple of days or longer. So it’s much less skittish than the nowcast.

On Sunday (post RNC bounce but before any real post DNC numbers came in), this was IIRC 52% Trump, 48% HRC. As of Monday night, with a bunch of new polls in, that figure is 64.8% HRC, 35.1% Trump. That is what you call a major bounce.

1. The **polls-plus** forecast, which includes polls, financial and historical data. It’s the most stable by far, and also the most accurate. Three weeks ago it had Clinton at 63%, Trump at 37%; today it’s 68% Clinton, 32% Trump. Still a pretty big move for this one.

You can read Silver’s more definitive explanations of each set of numbers (and his amusing personification of each forecast, which is where I got the ADHD comment) [in this post about Clinton’s post-DNC bounce](http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-clintons-bounce-appears-bigger-than-trumps/).

Hope that helps!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2016, 2:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738/120 "2016-08-03T02:41:39Z")

</div>

It does, thanks.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kaine-hillary-thinks-shes-gonna-win-by-a-landslide/760738.md?page=7)
