# Kamala Harris's choice of Tim Walz as VP

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kamala-harriss-choice-of-tim-walz-as-vp/1005352>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Tags:** kamala-harris\
**Created:** [August 6, 2024, 9:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kamala-harriss-choice-of-tim-walz-as-vp/1005352 "2024-08-06T21:19:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 230

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [August 8, 2024, 1:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kamala-harriss-choice-of-tim-walz-as-vp/1005352/230 "2024-08-08T01:02:50Z")

</div>

FWIW here’s one of the multiple past ones.

> [@Are social media's recent bannings a freedom of expression issue?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/are-social-medias-recent-bannings-a-freedom-of-expression-issue/930330):
>
> Starting a new thread because I think the other one ([OK Let's do this: who thinks social media's recent bannings are first amendment violations?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ok-lets-do-this-who-thinks-social-medias-recent-bannings-are-first-amendment-violations/930310/38)) asked the wrong question, but there was interesting discussion developing on the question of freedom of expression. Banning incitement to violence, or anything else that’s actually illegal, should not be a problem. But going further and banning political speech (and that includes ‘hate speech’ when it can be defined so broadly) is a freedom of expres…

Maybe revive it? Some good arguments made and they moved me a small bit off my hardline take on the fist amendment.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kamala-harriss-choice-of-tim-walz-as-vp/1005352)._
