# Kamala owns a gun "for personal safety"

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kamala-owns-a-gun-for-personal-safety/832465>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [April 12, 2019, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kamala-owns-a-gun-for-personal-safety/832465 "2019-04-12T22:54:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 367

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2019, 4:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kamala-owns-a-gun-for-personal-safety/832465/367 "2019-05-03T04:31:07Z")

</div>

> [@Lance\_Turbo](#):
>
> Here’s a greatest hits of false claims.
> 
> This doesn’t appear to have happened.
> 
> No evidence of this has been delivered.
> 
> Doesn’t look like it.
> 
> Not her law.
> 
> Probably not.
> 
> Nope.
> 
> Definitely not.
> 
> I don’t think so.
> 
> I haven’t seen any reason to believe this.
> 
> Definitely not true.
> 
> I don’t think this is true.
> 
> This is false. The DA does not rule on propositions.
> 
> I don’t think she had anything to do with these appeals.
> 
> She did no such thing.
> 
> She could not have done this. District Attorneys do not have this power.
> 
> Prop 9 was kept off the ballot by the California Supreme Court, not a DA.
> 
> She did not. This is not a thing that DA’s do.
> 
> I’m pretty sure she didn’t.
> 
> This clearing ballot propostions for legality mechanism is not a thing that exists. Sunrises, on the hand, do exist.
> 
> Nope. That’s not a thing DAs do.
> 
> This probably didn’t happen, but a cite could convince me that it did.
> 
> Definetly not. This is straight up false.
> 
> Blocked by the CA Supreme Court, not a DA or the AG.
> 
> Nothing like this exists. A big ball of false.
> 
> Definitely not a fact. She did not do this.
> 
> I doubt it.
> 
> I don’t believe that this occurred. I think you are mistaken.
> 
> You can’t show this because it didn’t happen.
> 
> The DA is not Board of Supervisors’ lawyer. It is extremely unlikely that they conferred with her on this matter.
> 
> Maybe the City Attorney, but I doubt it. Almost certainly not the DA.
> 
> I am seriously beginning to doubt that you saw her on TV in support of Prop H. I don’t think you’re lying. I think you’re wrong.
> 
> They definitely don’t have the power to keep it off the ballot and there is no evidence that Kamala Harris weighed in on this. Also, this is substantially different from your original claim. Would you like to withdraw that claim (again)?

Boy that must have taken you HOURS. :rolleyes: And, all it proves is that I was unable to give you a cite for something that really is meaningless. You have not proven me wrong, you just say I am wrong. And of course you dont want to violate the rules and call me a liar, even tho you clearly want to.

But that’s Ok. Ok, I dont have a cite that will make you happy for one of my claims.

Do you have any cites? For anything?

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kamala-owns-a-gun-for-personal-safety/832465)._