# Ketosis and glucose synthesis

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180
**Category:** Factual Questions
**Created:** [June 21, 2005, 9:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180 "2005-06-21T09:25:49Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SenorBeef](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senorbeef/32/2220_2.png) [@SenorBeef](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SenorBeef)
#### Post date: [June 21, 2005, 9:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/1 "2005-06-21T09:25:49Z")

</div>

I was reading over the [Wikipedia page](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketosis) on ketosis.

From it:

“Glucose must be conserved in the fasting state because parts of the brain, retina, kidney and red blood cells depend exclusively on it for energy, and in order to conserve muscle protein which must be catabolized to provide the glucogenic amino acid substrate for synthesis of glucose.”

First, the easy question - if ketosis is maintained without fasting (that is, with an extremely restricted carb diet), the protein required to synthesize glucose can come from dietary protein, and not from muscle protein, right? That is…does breaking down muscle protein only occur during starvation?

“But after several days of starvation, the brain transitions to burning ketones in order to more directly utilize the energy from the fat stores that are being depended upon, and to reserve the glucose only for its absolute needs, thus slowing the depletion of the body’s protein store in the muscles.”

Secondly, are there negative health implications for the retina, brain, kidneys, etc. to operate on synthesized glucose for extended periods, either due to availability of glucose or other reasons?

And does the brain suffer any deficiencies by transitioning to burning ketones in order to save glucose?  
The article also mentions a side effect of prolonged ketosis is “depleted glycogen stores”. Does that make sense? Ketosis only happens after glycogen stores are depleted - it’s a cause, rather than a side effect… or do I not understand?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Harmonix](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Harmonix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Harmonix)
#### Post date: [June 21, 2005, 1:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/2 "2005-06-21T13:25:39Z")

</div>

Ok, These are WAGS based on what i’ve learned in Biochemistry.

Metabolism is very complex, but it generally follows [Le Chatelier’s Principle](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Chatelier%27s_principle)

> [@](#):
>
> the protein required to synthesize glucose can come from dietary protein, and not from muscle protein, right? That is…does breaking down muscle protein only occur during starvation?

When you starve the body of glucose all reactions/reaction chains that produce glucose will shift toward glucose production. If you switch to glucogenesis from amino acids then in order to stop muscle catabolism you must have a glucogenesis rate fast enough to match normal intake of glucose. whether or not that is possible I don’t know. My gut feeling is you probably don’t (because you’re not always eating, you can’t always have high levels of amino acids and theres a maximum rate at how fast glucogenesis can happen) and you will strip more muscle on atkins then otherwise.

> [@](#):
>
> Secondly, are there negative health implications for the retina, brain, kidneys, etc. to operate on synthesized glucose for extended periods, either due to availability of glucose or other reasons?

Synthesized glucose is identical to ingested glucose. Availability is the only issue, and that depends on whether or not your body is capable of glucogenesis to match the need.

I seem to recall Ketosis raises blood acid level. That would have system-wide problems.

> [@](#):
>
> And does the brain suffer any deficiencies by transitioning to burning ketones in order to save glucose?

Theres a reason why a large portion of your blood supply goes directly to the brain first. Since your brain is pretty much priority #1 to your body it will activate any and all [Homeostatic](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeostasis) mechanisms to supply the brain. This of course means the rest of your tissues will starve.

> [@](#):
>
> The article also mentions a side effect of prolonged ketosis is “depleted glycogen stores”. Does that make sense? Ketosis only happens after glycogen stores are depleted - it’s a cause, rather than a side effect… or do I not understand?

I suspect a side effect of _maintained_ ketosis is that not enough glucose can be made to fill the glycogen stores, as Glycogen(and later fat) is only made when there is excess glucose. This would also seem to support my gut feeling that your body is generally not capable of fast enough glucogenesis to supply the body.

The body is a finely tuned machine and is so because of self-adjusting A la Le chatlier’s principle and on a higher level [Feedback](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feedback) mechanisms(both positive and negative). Feedback mechanisms are located at both global and local levels and they may compound or compete or complement. Low Glucose will globally shut down your mebolism, and I suspect burning fat also signals to locally lowering one’s metabolism, thus compounding. However Once glucose levels are restored, but fat is still being burned I can see competition between the feedback mechanisms.

Just to reinforce the WAGness of this. Take the last paragaph with a grain of salt. It’s based entirely off suspicions and assumptions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![bizzwire](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/958977/32.png) [@bizzwire](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bizzwire)
#### Post date: [June 21, 2005, 4:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/3 "2005-06-21T16:07:17Z")

</div>

> [@SenorBeef](#):
>
> First, the easy question - if ketosis is maintained without fasting (that is, with an extremely restricted carb diet), the protein required to synthesize glucose can come from dietary protein, and not from muscle protein, right? That is…does breaking down muscle protein only occur during starvation?

Yes. After you have used up all the glycogen in your liver, if blood glucose remains low, your body begins breaking down protein. It’s the equivalent of chopping up your furniture to keep your house warm when you run out of oil.  
This is why people eat lots of protein during Atkins. Their body “thinks” they are starving/fasting because there is no ready source of glucose. FLooding yourself with proteins prevents you from basically digesting yourself.

> [@](#):
>
> The article also mentions a side effect of prolonged ketosis is “depleted glycogen stores”. Does that make sense? Ketosis only happens after glycogen stores are depleted - it’s a cause, rather than a side effect… or do I not understand?

Glycogen is a short-term, readily-available storage form of glucose. You store a limited supply to keep blood levels normal during short fasting periods (such as the 8-10 hours when you are sleeping). Once this is used up (1-2 days?), your body starts “burning” protein. In cases of actual starvation, your own body supplies the protein. After a couple of days of this, **THEN** you start “burning” fat reserves and generating the ketone bodies that define “ketosis.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SenorBeef](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senorbeef/32/2220_2.png) [@SenorBeef](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SenorBeef)
#### Post date: [June 21, 2005, 5:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/4 "2005-06-21T17:44:21Z")

</div>

> [@Harmonix](#):
>
> When you starve the body of glucose all reactions/reaction chains that produce glucose will shift toward glucose production. If you switch to glucogenesis from amino acids then in order to stop muscle catabolism you must have a glucogenesis rate fast enough to match normal intake of glucose.

Why is there an obligation to match the normal intake of glucose? Given that most parts of the body can run directly on fat for energy, wouldn’t the rate of glucogenesis only need to be sufficient for those organs that require glucose?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![groman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/73ab20/32.png) [@groman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/groman)
#### Post date: [June 21, 2005, 6:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/5 "2005-06-21T18:41:15Z")

</div>

I’m curious, with all this talk about low carb being bad or good for you, are you telling me there are no cultures/people that naturally eat mostly protein diet?

Claims that Atkins will kill you, or damage your kidneys make me annoyed because I can’t fathom that after millions of years of meat eating(or am I wrong here), the few thousands of years of agriculture that we had ruined our ability to eat meat?

I can understand how an all-grain diet can be harmful, but claims that an all meat diet is anything but healthy seem rather dubious.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SenorBeef](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senorbeef/32/2220_2.png) [@SenorBeef](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SenorBeef)
#### Post date: [June 21, 2005, 8:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/6 "2005-06-21T20:06:00Z")

</div>

> [@groman](#):
>
> I can understand how an all-grain diet can be harmful, but claims that an all meat diet is anything but healthy seem rather dubious.

I’m with you, generally, but I wanted to know some specific aspects about the metabolic processes involved.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Harmonix](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Harmonix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Harmonix)
#### Post date: [June 22, 2005, 4:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/7 "2005-06-22T04:20:10Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Why is there an obligation to match the normal intake of glucose? Given that most parts of the body can run directly on fat for energy, wouldn’t the rate of glucogenesis only need to be sufficient for those organs that require glucose?

Again, Wag.

There will be some base-line level that your body WANTS your glucose level to be at. This is intrinsic, but there is likely a range your metabolism can adapt to. It will do anything it can to reach that level. When glucose levels are lower then optimal then Fat and free amino acids will probably be preferentially used for gluconeogenesis, barring the availiability of those, muscle catabolism will be next.

But you are probably right that the minimum acceptable level is sufficient production to feed anaerobic tissues, as they will likely preferentially get the glucose.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ragiel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/6de8d8/32.png) [@Ragiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ragiel)
#### Post date: [June 22, 2005, 3:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/8 "2005-06-22T15:14:11Z")

</div>

> [@SenorBeef](#):
>
> I was reading over the [Wikipedia page](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketosis) on ketosis.
> 
> From it:  
> \<clip\>
> 
> “But after several days of starvation,\*\* the brain transitions to burning ketones \*\*in order to more directly utilize the energy from the fat stores that are being depended upon, and to reserve the glucose only for its absolute needs, thus slowing the depletion of the body’s protein store in the muscles.”  
> And does the brain suffer any deficiencies by transitioning to burning ketones in order to save glucose?
> 
> \<clip\>

(bolding mine)

No. The brain is not able to use anything as fuel **except glucose.** Without adequate glucose, irreversible damage and brain death are only minutes away. The body’s catabolic processes work to turn the ketones into glucose for just that reason.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bippy\_the\_Beardless](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ac8455/32.png) [@Bippy\_the\_Beardless](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bippy_the_Beardless)
#### Post date: [June 22, 2005, 3:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/9 "2005-06-22T15:58:41Z")

</div>

> [@groman](#):
>
> I’m curious, with all this talk about low carb being bad or good for you, are you telling me there are no cultures/people that naturally eat mostly protein diet?
> 
> Claims that Atkins will kill you, or damage your kidneys make me annoyed because I can’t fathom that after millions of years of meat eating(or am I wrong here), the few thousands of years of agriculture that we had ruined our ability to eat meat?
> 
> I can understand how an all-grain diet can be harmful, but claims that an all meat diet is anything but healthy seem rather dubious.

Well a hunter gatherer’s diet was not all meat, but the ratio of meat to carbohydrates was higher than modern western diet. Here is a nice (warning PDF) paper on the eating habits of modern hunter gatherer societies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SenorBeef](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senorbeef/32/2220_2.png) [@SenorBeef](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SenorBeef)
#### Post date: [June 22, 2005, 4:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/10 "2005-06-22T16:09:21Z")

</div>

> [@Ragiel](#):
>
> (bolding mine)
> 
> No. The brain is not able to use anything as fuel **except glucose.** Without adequate glucose, irreversible damage and brain death are only minutes away. The body’s catabolic processes work to turn the ketones into glucose for just that reason.

The article in the OP mentioned that certain nerve fibers required the glucose for anerobic respiration, but that the rest of the brain switched over to working directly off of ketones.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ragiel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/6de8d8/32.png) [@Ragiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ragiel)
#### Post date: [June 23, 2005, 2:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/11 "2005-06-23T14:56:11Z")

</div>

Checkin’ back in. I looked up some references yesterday on the office computer, and I was mistaken. Most nerve cells, including the brain cells essential for continued life, **can** synthesize significant amounts of 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase under terms of starvation, and that does allow them to use of small-chain ketones. I apologize for the error. Also I promise humbly to update my knowledge any time I’m tempted to speak out on the basis of 20-year-old medical education.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Walloon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/fbc32d/32.png) [@Walloon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Walloon)
#### Post date: [June 23, 2005, 3:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/12 "2005-06-23T15:05:28Z")

</div>

From the Atkins Frequently Asked Questions:

> [@](#):
>
> **Doesn’t ketosis lead to loss of muscle mass?**
> 
> The notion that the Atkins Nutritional ApproachTM—high in protein, which builds muscle, and fat, which is used for energy—will force your body to break down muscle is incorrect. Only individuals on very low-calorie diets can lose muscle mass, because they have an inadequate protein intake. Atkins, however, is not calorie restricted (this isn’t an invitation for gorging, but a recommendation to eat until you are no longer hungry) and the high protein intake required offsets any possible loss of body mass.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Girl\_From\_Mars](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/3da27b/32.png) [@Girl\_From\_Mars](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Girl_From_Mars)
#### Post date: [June 23, 2005, 5:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/13 "2005-06-23T17:10:32Z")

</div>

**Senior Beef** , given that the diet you are proposing to follow is a combination of both Atkins (very low-carb) _and_ very low calorie (around 900/day) the comment above would indicate that you are likely to lose muscle loss. Totally support your right to choose a diet that suits you and commend you for trying, but I do think you are playing on dangerous ground taking the most extreme elements of a number of diets and cobbling them into your own version, of which you don’t clearly know the side-effects. Why don’t you just follow Atkins, and forget the calorie restriction, or restrict calories to around 2,500 and eat what you want?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Harmonix](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Harmonix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Harmonix)
#### Post date: [June 23, 2005, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/14 "2005-06-23T22:28:29Z")

</div>

Wha? where does **seniorbeef** say he has low calorie diet?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![groman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/73ab20/32.png) [@groman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/groman)
#### Post date: [June 23, 2005, 10:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/15 "2005-06-23T22:32:56Z")

</div>

Another sidetrack:

I find it rather odd that the body would burn any muscle while there are fat reserves available. That would seem to be a serious evolutionary disadvantage for anybody living in a northern climate, since you’d be too weak by the end of winter. Have there been conclusive studies that show that in overweight individuals, there’s muscle loss due to catabolism(not just atrophy from non-use, or whatever)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![bdgr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a87d85/32.png) [@bdgr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bdgr)
#### Post date: [June 23, 2005, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/16 "2005-06-23T22:54:06Z")

</div>

> [@Ragiel](#):
>
> (bolding mine)
> 
> No. The brain is not able to use anything as fuel **except glucose.** Without adequate glucose, irreversible damage and brain death are only minutes away. The body’s catabolic processes work to turn the ketones into glucose for just that reason.

IIRC this has been proven false, and the brain functions better on ketones than glucose. I’ll try to find the cite.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Harmonix](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Harmonix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Harmonix)
#### Post date: [June 23, 2005, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/17 "2005-06-23T23:01:37Z")

</div>

First off, evolution isn’t directed. It only selects among what is available.

Second, protein is broken down, rebuilt and recycled all the time. Those enzymes are ALREADY there and in number. It makes sense that metabolism would initially shift to protein based gluconeogenesis then switch to fat reserves after a few days(because enzymes take time to make and it’s wasteful to maintain enzymes which aren’t being used).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Harmonix](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Harmonix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Harmonix)
#### Post date: [June 23, 2005, 11:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/18 "2005-06-23T23:03:13Z")

</div>

> [@bdgr](#):
>
> IIRC this has been proven false, and the brain functions better on ketones than glucose. I’ll try to find the cite.

I find this hard to believe.

Better? As good maybe, but better?

_looking forward to cite_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Girl\_From\_Mars](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/3da27b/32.png) [@Girl\_From\_Mars](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Girl_From_Mars)
#### Post date: [June 23, 2005, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/19 "2005-06-23T23:24:28Z")

</div>

> [@Harmonix](#):
>
> Wha? where does **seniorbeef** say he has low calorie diet?

Sorry, that was from his [thread](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=322197) about his planned diet in MPSIMS, apologies **Senior Beef** , don’t want you to think I am stalking you! The GQ question just caught my eye as I had read your other thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Harmonix](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Harmonix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Harmonix)
#### Post date: [June 24, 2005, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180/20 "2005-06-24T00:07:37Z")

</div>

[http://www.np.edu.sg/~dept-bio/biochemistry/aab/topics/aab\_lipid.htm](http://www.np.edu.sg/~dept-bio/biochemistry/aab/topics/aab_lipid.htm)

I found this. From Girl from mar’s link what you are proposing sounds alot like their “starvation diet”

It says theres going to be muscle catabolism.

900 calories a day? How much protein can that possible be? At the very least I hope you’re taking your vitamens.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ketosis-and-glucose-synthesis/309180.md?page=2)
