Khadaji's Whatcha Readin' - July 2013

I got a detective novel called Cuts Through Bone at the library because the description looked interesting: A New York PI and his young assistant are hired to investigate the murder of a rich student whose veteran boyfriend has been framed for the crime. They need to find the real killer.

I learned later that the author is 25 years into a life sentence for murder and arson. This is his first book, and it won the Best First Novel prize from the Private Eye Writers of America, sponsored by Minotaur Books. I guess he won’t be making any personal appearances.

I can’t tell you how disappointed I was in this book. The plot was interesting and the procedurals were believable, especially how they questioned sources and did their investigations, but his writing just got more and more aggravating. The author must have referred to the male character as “the little detective” no fewer than two hundred times. No exaggeration. Sometimes in three consecutive paragraphs. And the female was “the young Puerto Rican,” and their client was “the big veteran.” Over and over and over.

By the time I was three-quarters done i was just skimming, and I gave up five pages from the end. I really liked the characters! But couldn’t someone else write about them?

I’m almost finished The Haunting of Maddy Clare, by Simone St. James. Meh. Conventional predictable ghost story and a tad too romancey for my taste.

Hope you really like it - I did.

May I suggest you and Intergalactic Gladiator italicize the names of your books? They stand out better that way for those skimming the thread. Thanks!

I am enjoying **The Charm School **by Nelson DeMille, a writer I find very reliable as to characters and believable plot. I think I have read just about all of his books and have yet to be disappointed.

I finished The Last Man on Earth Club. Liked it, but this was one of those books where I enjoyed the journey more than the destination.

Currently I’m reading Absent by Katie Williams, a YA ghost tale.

I just finished Jan Harold Brunvand’s The Vanishing Hitchhiker, which I thoroughly enjoyed. I’ve no real idea why it has taken me nearly 30 years to get around to reading this, especially since it’s right up my alley. Off to the library website to order up some more…
I’d also like to take a moment to recommend a thread to you - I run these Short Fiction contests and Poetry Sweatshops here at the SDMB. We are in the midst of voting on the June 2013 Poetry Sweatshop, and the floor is open to commentary from readers. There are some very strong poems in this round (including some written by regular contributors to these threads), all created within an hour and all using the same three words as a starting point. If you’re interested, the Anthology Thread is at this link.

I love both of those books!

I’m currently reading the Jumper books by Steven Gould. I just finished Jumper last night and am now about halfway through Reflex. I read Impulse at the beginning of the month.

I also just finished Man In The Empty Suit by Sean Ferrell 2 nights ago.

Finished Truman, by David McCullough. What a great read! Highly recommended. As mentioned, I would like to read his The Great Bridge, a history of the Brooklyn Bridge, but looking around Bangkok it seems that may be the only one of his not available here. But it should turn up sooner or later.

Meanwhile, in the next couple of days, probably Monday, I shall start The Godfather of Kathmandu, by local American author John Burdett. The fourth in his Bangkok 8 detective series. I know, I know, earlier in this month’s very thread I said it had received poor reviews here. But I was in my library, and lo and behold, there it was sitting on the shelf, so I figured what the heck. Picked it up. Looks like part of it may actually be set in Kathmandu, and since it’s been awhile since I’ve been there, it will be good to revisit that wonderful city again, if only in print.

Coincidentally, a friend was reading The Alienist at the same time I was, and we ended up comparing notes a lot. We were talking about how hack it was that the book essentially ends when

Teddy Roosevelt shows up … but then we realized that maybe a lot of books could be improved by adding an ending that is TR showing up out of the clear blue to kick ass and take names. Thus, the birth of TR Ex Machina, a party game where players are challenged to retell the ending of famous, or infamous, books using this formula. I will mention it got a little scary recently when someone used Fifty Shades of Gray as the challenge.

I’m three-quarters though Americanah. This is the third book I’ve read by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and my favorite so far. Half of a Yellow Sun was very good but some of the parts about Nigerian/Biafran history dragged. I just don’t have any interest in military stuff.

Usually I prefer books about Americans or possibly Brits if you must, because hey, I’m American and we love ourselves. But Adichie is getting to be one of my favorite authors.

Yes, please, check it out, ya’ll!

Glad you enjoyed Truman. My other favorites of his are 1776 (about a key year of the American Revolution), Brave Companions (short essays about important but often-overlooked figures in U.S. history) and Mornings on Horseback (the childhood and early adulthood of Theodore Roosevelt).

I see J.K. Rowling has a new book out, although not under her own name: JK Rowling Pseudonym: Robert Galbraith's 'The Cuckoo's Calling' Is Actually By Harry Potter Author | HuffPost Entertainment

I finished Eleanor & Park, which is a very sweet YA novel set in the 1980s. It’s a romance, but I really do think it has slightly somewhat appeal because Eleanor and Park are such great outsider characters.

Was at Readercon over the weekend. I bought and rapidly devoured The Science Fiction Novel by Basil Davenport, Robert Heinlein, C.<M. Kornbluth, Alfed Bester, and Robert Bloch, More Issues at Hand by “William Atheling, Jr.” (James Blish), and Who Killed Science Fiction?, by a whole stack of SF writers and edited by Earl Kemp. I’d wanted to read these for several years, two of them because they have sections by Heinlein that I hadn’t read.

The Heinlein stuff is interesting. An effort similar to Kemp’s went out many years ago, a questionnaire asking and science fiction film. It was published in Focus on Science Fiction Film, and featured replied from a lot of SF writers, many of whom waxed eloquent over the chance (such as Isaac Asimov and John Campbell). Heinlein responded, but his anwers are so terse that you’d think they were charging him for each reply. In his mind, maybe they were, since it was uncompensated, and detracted from his writing time. It’s surprising that he answered at all.

For Who Killed Science Fiction? (which was apparently Magazine science fiction, which clearly had declined in number and quality, and pretty clearly a lot of it went into paperback sales, however much those questioned denied it), Heinlein wrote fuller answers, but insisted that his name not be used. He was listed as “Anonymous #1”, and I guess it’s only the passage of time that revealed his identity. According to Kemp, Heinlein came up to him after the book’s publication and gave him a back-handed compliment, saying that if he knew how good and serious a work it would turn out to be, he’d have let them use his name. (There was an Anonymous #2 as well – Philip Jose Farmer. I don’t know why he was anonymous). Heinlein’s contribution to “The Science Fiction Novel” was a speech he gave at the University of Chicago in 1957. I assume Heinlein was paid for that one, or liked the prestige of lecturing at a major university.

I picked up a lot of other books, but the two more interesting are A. Merritt’s weird old The Metal Monster. Based on the cover, you’d think it was some post-victorian novel anbout a lost civilzation with a Giant Robot, but it’s really something rather different. My old copy of it has come to pieces, so I was glad to get a fresh copy and finally finish reading it.

The other is Jules Verne’s Travel Scholarships (Bourses de Voyage), the last of Verne’s novels to be translated into English. Since 2000, Wesleyan has been working to get the last holdouts of Verne’s novels translated (the others being *Le Freres Kip, l’Invasion de la Mer, * and Le Superbe Orinoco, all translated in the interrim). This was the last holdout. Actually, there were some other odd ones, such as The Shipwrecked Family (the original draft of what became The Mysterious Island and Journey Through the Impossible (a play, with Captain Nemo and other Verne characters in it) that have appeared in the last decade, as well. As have the first translations of Verne works published posthumously and which his son Michel had altered. The original un-altered versions of these have been translated and published in the past decade as well – The Meteor Hunt, The Secret of Wilhelm Storitz, and The Golden Volcano.

But Bourses de Voyage is, as far as I know, the last remaining holdout. I like reading Verne that I haven’t read in the summer, so this will be a treat.

This was pretty light, and I didn’t like the main character. At least it was short.

Now I’m working on American Elsewhere, sci fi/horror about a weird little town.

I finished Lirael and started Abhorsen but haven’t progressed far as yet, in part because I wanted to finish Ready Player One by Ernest Cline this weekend. I really enjoyed that one: great world-building and all the geek-lore a girl could want. One of my local librarians refused to let me leave the library until he’d located a copy, checked it out to me, and commanded me to read it forthwith, though I knew nothing of the book myself. “I saw you and knew you needed to read it right away!” he said in parting - I guess he’s taken my measure. :smiley:

Right now I’m partway through three books: Bad Monkey by Carl Hiaasen, The Blade Itself by Joe Abercrombie, and Beautiful Creatures by Kami Garcia. Bad Monkey is still Hiaasen, but for some reason, it’s falling a little flat for me thus far - but I’m not that far into it yet.

The Blade Itself has me fascinated: characters with lots of depth, plenty of separate conflicts that are winding themselves together, and all of it set in an interesting world thus far.

I picked up Beautiful Creatures since I thought the movie trailer looked awful and wanted to see how good or bad the book was. So far, it’s hackneyed but not horrible. Not good either - I’ve read better YA witch stuff.

Last night I finished The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, which I liked much more than when I’d read it in college (it helped that I’d recently seen the DiCaprio movie). This time around, from (I hope) a more mature perspective than I had in my twenties, I had a better understanding of Gatsby’s pining for Daisy, and of her very mixed emotions at being torn between her husband and her former suitor. I found myself more critical of Fitzgerald’s writing style, though - he uses adverbs a lot more than I remembered.

For a change of pace, I’m next re-reading a favorite Star Trek novel, Doctor’s Orders by Diane Duane. Dr. McCoy complains once too often about Kirk’s decision-making, so Kirk leaves him in command of the Enterprise while the captain is off the ship. Then Kirk disappears…

I just finished The Circular Staircase by Mary Roberts Rinehart.

Very much an old-school mystery novel, but a lot of fun, mainly because I liked the narrator Rinehart created. Imagine an old-fashioned British* whodunnit narrated by one of Bertie Wooster’s shrewish old aunts. A lot more fun to read than the simplistic (and much imitated) plot would lead you to expect.

TIme for some heavy reading now, so I’ll start An American Tragedy later today.

  • It feels like an English mystery, even though Rinehart and the story’s setting were American.

Checked out Kurt Vonnegut’s God Bless You, Dr. Kevorkian from the e-library and read thru its scant 96 pages yesterday.

It’s a rather odd collection - Vonnegut presents a series of near-death experiences where he interviews the dead, both famous (Hitler, Eugene V Debs) and less-so (Vivian Hallinan, Harold Epstein), showing off his little-h humanism in nearly every sketch.

While I was entertained with Vonnegut’s portrayal of Heaven (yes, even Hitler goes to Heaven, as there is no Hell - not in Vonnegut’s tongue-in-cheek afterlife) I didn’t feel it was quite up to his usual satirical humour. Perhaps it was the constraints of the set-up (90-second interludes on WNYC).

Worth a library read at least if you’re a Vonnegut fan - if & when it shows up as a sale item on Kindle (they seem to cycle thru his older works on a regular basis) I’ll probably pick it up.


I finally finished Eighty Days: Nellie Bly and Elizabeth Bisland’s History-Making Race Around the World by Matthew Goodman, also an e-read. I started it in March but the checkout expired, so I went back on the long waitlist. Missed my chance to check it out again in early May (out of town) and finally got a hold of it again early this month. I wish I’d been able to read it all at once, but still feel my time was well spent.

I was vaguely aware of Nellie Bly, but not about her race around the world; and had never heard of Elizabeth Bisland at all. While both women came from very different backgrounds (Bly from a hardscrabble mining town and Bisland from the Old South); they both faced poverty and saw education, journalism specifically, as their way out. Again, they pursued different paths - with Bly becoming an investigative journalist for a daily broadside, and Bisland worked on the society and literary pages of a more genteel monthly magazine.

Bly came up with the “Around the World” trip more or less on her own; while Bisland was talked into it by her editors. Nevertheless, both women started their journey on November 14, 1889 - Bly heading east from Jersey City across the Atlantic, while Bisland took the train west across the United States.

Goodman follows each woman via her own recollections, weaving in historical tidbits about the newspapers, the methods of transportation (steamships and trains, primarily) and the current state of affairs in the countries they pass through along the way. The research is solid (as far as I can tell) and the writing entertaining, allowing the personalities of Bly and Bisland to shine through.

I found myself rooting for Bisland a bit more than Bly, as I felt more of a kinship with her, but both women’s stories were compelling. Goodman also follows them thru the rest of their careers and lives - demonstrating while they shared a near-unique experience, they were very different people.

Recommended to anyone interested in women journalists or world travel in the Victorian period. I don’t know if I’ll return to this book anytime soon, but I thoroughly enjoyed the read.

I’m assuming that’s an intentional reference to “God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater”?

Sounds interesting. I just read the Wiki article on Bisland: Elizabeth Bisland - Wikipedia

Does the book say she was purposefully misled about the “swift German steamer Ems” having already left Southampton? Was it sabotage by the Bly camp?