Got a buncha reading done during vacation earlier this month; however I made a minor mistake by reading two detective noir books at the same time: Gun, With Occasional Music by Jonathan Lethem and Avery Nolan, Private Dick of the Strange: The Case of the Zombie Menace by Tony Faville. Even though they had very different settings and plots, at times elements from one novel bled over in my mind to the other.
The Avery Nolan novel is set in the 1950’s, with the title character being a Korean War vet. He gets pulled into what seems to be a missing-persons case, but turns into a government coverup with KGB turncoats and (as you might guess from the title) the undead. While Faville revels in the vocabulary, turns of phrase and the cliches of the genre, the underlying story moves along nicely, with some fun twists in the plot and an exciting, well-written (IMHO) fight scene near the end. While I’m not a regular reader of this type of book, I did enjoy it for what it was. Recommended to fans of genre novels looking for something a little different.
The Lethem novel is set in the not-too-distant future, where evolved animals fill menial roles, citizens’ karma levels are controlled by the government, and it’s socially acceptable (darned near mandatory) to take designer amnesiac/mood altering drugs. An infidelity suspicion case that involves murder pits our gumshoe against his old co-workers and gangsters. Fascinating world-building, with compelling characters and a plot that captured and held my interest throughout. I think this is the first Lethem novel I’ve read, tho it certainly won’t be my last.
I finally got around to reading Make Room! Make Room! by Harry Harrison courtesy of the Kindle Daily Deal back in February. While not quite noir, it still falls into the detective genre IMHO. A very bleak novel that I guess is more dystopian than post-apocalyptic, as there wasn’t a specific disaster, just a population explosion. Is it just me, or does the story play a secondary role to the world-building and philosophical points Harrison was trying to make? In that respect, it felt a lot like a Heinlein novel, but without quite as engaging a story. It also felt dated, but I can’t quite put my finger on how at the moment.
I agree with my GoodReads friends that the ending was anti-climactic, and (tho I don’t know if I’ve ever seen the entire film) has very little to do with Soylent Green, the film supposedly based on the novel.
On the non-fiction side, I picked up Operation Mincemeat: How a Dead Man and a Bizarre Plan Fooled the Nazis and Assured an Allied Victory by Ben Macintyre thanks to friedo’s recommendation. I’d recently read For Your Eyes Only: Ian Fleming And James Bond by the same author, and was interested to read more specifics about this audacious disinformation plan that the Fleming bio only hinted at.
Macintyre’s book is extremely well-researched and detailed; but reads like fiction. The main characters - Flight Lieutenant Charles Cholmondeley and Lieutenant Commander Ewen Montagu - could easily be James Bond’s colleagues back at MI6, and the actual rollout of the plan, where the faked documents slowly made their way to the Germans, was as tense as the climax of many a Bond film. Even knowing that it was successful didn’t detract from the sense of suspense. I think I may have to track down the first book referencing this operation, written by Montagu himself, The Man Who Never Was, to see his take on the events, as well as the movie based on the book.