There have been several cites already posted in this thread.
My point is that I have learned to listen to Lamar Mundane.
There have been several cites already posted in this thread.
My point is that I have learned to listen to Lamar Mundane.
I must have missed the post which gives the cite for the proposition that the doctor saw the body but did not report it; or that the doctor was a lefty; or that he had a serrated knife; etc.
Can you tell me which post numbers those cites are in?
Or perhaps you will just admit that you were wrong.
I guess that means you won’t admit you were wrong.
As long as you are summarizing the evidence, it’s worth considering that the Defendant apparently did possess the specialized weapons necessary to commit the crime.
I don’t know how many goth kids keep survival knives and scalpels around.
Granted, possessing weapons doesn’t prove anything in and of itself. Still, it seems like quite a coincidence that a woman is stabbed and mutilated by a lefty with a serrated knife and a scalpel and there happens to be a lefty with a serrated knife and a scalpel who fantasizes about stabbing women and who lives within a couple hundred feet of the crime scene.
Nowhere in that post do I say that possession of the weapons automatically made Masters a greater priority suspect than anyone else.
Indeed, I was careful to point out that just possessing the weapons per se doesn’t prove anything.
I must have missed the post which gives the cite for the proposition that the doctor saw the body but did not report it; or that the doctor was a lefty; or that he had a serrated knife; etc.
Can you tell me which post numbers those cites are in?
Or perhaps you will just admit that you were wrong.
I don’t understand why this is even an issue. This isn’t an episode of Perry Mason, where another person has to convicted in order to let an innocent go free.
Which evidence did the police cover up?
-FrL-
I don’t understand why this is even an issue.
Me either. I made that point to Zebra earlier:
Not that it really matters, because you’re missing the point. Masters was not convicted just because he was a goth and drew some violent pictures. It’s as simple as that.
How do you know that he received a 5.9 million dollar settlement? Did you interview him personally, and view his bank statement? Did you subject his bank manager to a lie detector test? Or do you just believe everything you read in the paper?
(I kid, I kid!)
I come away with one thing from this thread: Dude…back away from the rolleyes.
I’m going to leave this thread open, as the post resurrecting it provides a useful coda to the discussion. However, please remember that this thread was started in 2008, and that the arguments contained herein all happened two years ago.
I don’t mean to keep bumping this thread, but some big news came out this morning.
Cop in Tim Masters case indicted on perjury charges
The lead detective in the Tim Masters’ murder investigation was indicted this morning on eight counts of felony first-degree perjury.
Each count names Fort Collins Police Lt. James Broderick and carries the possibility of two to six years in prison and a maximum fine of $500,000.
I want to see exactly what the Op actually knows about the case, before he convicts the legal system and the jury on even less evidence than he accuses them of having. Note that he wouldn’t answer my questions.
No direct physical evidence, no eyewitnesses, and no confessions and the jury still convicted? It sure sounds like they were willing to convict with very little evidence to me. Some days it just doesn’t pay to go to court.
Odesio
Thanks for the updates Lamar.
The only thing missing from this thread was to call the kid fat.
I don’t mean to keep bumping this thread, but some big news came out this morning.
If he’s smart, he’ll choose his wardrobe carefully.
It’s too bad the cop won’t have to serve the same exact length of sentence that Master did.
On page 1, two years ago, somebody asked what this case reminded the OP of. The repressed memory cases of the 1980s were mentioned.
I was reminded of the West Memphis Three, who were profiled in 2 HBO documentaries. (doc.#2).
What percentage of goth kids keep survival knives and scalpels around?
I just stumbled on this recently bumped thread, but…
I wasn’t a goth, but when I was 15 I did in fact have a survival knife and a scalpel in my possession. I didn’t think much of it at the time either, and my parents knew I had both. I certainly wasn’t the only kid with a survival knife. The scalpel was a left over from some procedure a family remember had done- I thought it was cool, and they gave it to me.
No idea what percentages would actually be- but I don’t find it alarming this kid had those items.
Thankfully I lived 1500 miles away from Fort Collins, or I’d be worried about being charged too.