# Kissing your husband while black? Not if the LAPD can help it.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [September 14, 2014, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492 "2014-09-14T19:21:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 54

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fotheringay-Phipps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d9b06d/32.png) [@Fotheringay-Phipps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fotheringay-Phipps)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 4:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1061 "2014-09-18T16:54:19Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> At 9:49:57 on the bank camera’s video timestamp, Lollie leaves. Prior to that point, what facts establish probable cause?
> 
> I have no idea what the guard reported. It’s possible that he called in a report of a man, explained that he asked the man to leave, and that he had told the man the area was private and that he (the guard) was either the lawful possessor thereof or was authorized by the lawful possessor to demand that trespassers depart.
> 
> And it’s possible that the dispatcher then communicated to the officer all of that information.
> 
> But it’s unlikely, because that kind of attention to detail is almost unheard of in these types of incidents.
> 
> But if, in fact, all that happened, then the officer would have had probable cause for arrest.

If I had to guess I would say all that did happen. Not in such a formal manner, with all the legalese, but in effect.

Because the same facts that you are saying establish probable cause are the same ones which would also help the officer in dealing with the situation when he got there (who the complainant is, what the suspect did prior to the officers arrival etc.)

And the same goes for the Watts case. Guy reported witnessing them having sex in a car. ISTM that this is probable cause for indecent exposure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1062 "2014-09-18T16:57:35Z")

</div>

> [@Fotheringay-Phipps](#):
>
> And the same goes for the Watts case. Guy reported witnessing them having sex in a car. ISTM that this is probable cause for indecent exposure.

For the Watts case, this wouldn’t have mattered – the crime in question was a misdemeanor, and it wasn’t going on when the officers arrived, so the detainment of Watts to identify her was unlawful.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fotheringay-Phipps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d9b06d/32.png) [@Fotheringay-Phipps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fotheringay-Phipps)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1063 "2014-09-18T16:58:38Z")

</div>

You’re missing the boat. Reread the exchange.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1064 "2014-09-18T17:01:01Z")

</div>

> [@Fotheringay-Phipps](#):
>
> You’re missing the boat. Reread the exchange.

What did I miss? In an earlier post, **Bricker** laid out what’s required for an arrest/detainment, and the circumstances you described for Watts do not appear to qualify.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hooleehootoo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/eada6e/32.png) [@Hooleehootoo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hooleehootoo)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1065 "2014-09-18T17:03:22Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> No bank, nor any City attorney involved in the Daniele Watts incident, so what the fuck are you babbling about?

I want to say hear, hear to DrDeth. Mixing (hijacking) this other MN case in with this thread makes it hard to follow for people who are interested in the specific facts of the Watts case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1066 "2014-09-18T17:03:22Z")

</div>

> [@Smapti](#):
>
> Well then, do feel free to define the specific statute under which a police officer can be arrested for asking someone their name.

They did more than that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1067 "2014-09-18T17:09:30Z")

</div>

> [@Smapti](#):
>
> Of course, the stop _was_ justified at its inception, so none of this matters anyway.

The whole reaswon for the controversy is that the stop wasn’t justified. When Hentor pointed out that you cannot stop someone for suspicion of an already completed misdemeanor, Bricker realized that everything that everything that followed was an unlawful exercise of police power.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![IvoryTowerDenizen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ivorytowerdenizen/32/17937_2.png) [@IvoryTowerDenizen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/IvoryTowerDenizen)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1068 "2014-09-18T17:13:12Z")

</div>

> [@Smapti](#):
>
> The arguments I’ve heard boil down to “Stop-and-frisk is racist because they’re arresting black people for committing crimes”.

Nope. Try again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LurkerInNJ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ed655f/32.png) [@LurkerInNJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LurkerInNJ)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1069 "2014-09-18T17:13:44Z")

</div>

> [@XT](#):
>
> I’m confused…are they married or not? I thought I read he was her boyfriend. 😕

Her/their story is so full of shit and they are both looney toones so I wouldn’t hazard a guess.

He now claims they were “doing yoga” in the car to explain their unique positioning in the leaked photos.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fotheringay-Phipps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d9b06d/32.png) [@Fotheringay-Phipps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fotheringay-Phipps)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1070 "2014-09-18T17:14:13Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> What did I miss? In an earlier post, **Bricker** laid out what’s required for an arrest/detainment, and the circumstances you described for Watts do not appear to qualify.

You’re wrong.

**Reread the exchange.**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1071 "2014-09-18T17:15:42Z")

</div>

> [@Fotheringay-Phipps](#):
>
> You’re wrong.
> 
> **Reread the exchange.**

I did. Whether or not it’s a Terry stop, I still don’t see how the circumstances qualify as a legitimate detainment/arrest in the Watts case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1072 "2014-09-18T17:16:24Z")

</div>

> [@Hooleehootoo](#):
>
> I want to say hear, hear to DrDeth. Mixing (hijacking) this other MN case in with this thread makes it hard to follow for people who are interested in the specific facts of the Watts case.

Thank you! Not that that case might not be fully worthy of a thread by itself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1073 "2014-09-18T17:16:27Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> No, they were investigating Indecent Exposure, and no one gave a Phony name. Watts refused to ID herself, but her husband did.

You’re not my supervisor!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smapti](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/smapti/32/17938_2.png) [@Smapti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smapti)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1074 "2014-09-18T17:17:04Z")

</div>

> [@IvoryTowerDenizen](#):
>
> Nope. Try again.

Well, with an ironclad refutation like that, I may as well just go rethink my entire life.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![IvoryTowerDenizen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ivorytowerdenizen/32/17937_2.png) [@IvoryTowerDenizen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/IvoryTowerDenizen)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1075 "2014-09-18T17:20:05Z")

</div>

> [@Smapti](#):
>
> Well, with an ironclad refutation like that, I may as well just go rethink my entire life.

Then my work here is done.

Alternatively you could actually look into yourself rather than relying on things you’ve “heard” or start to demonstrate an interest in learning, so as not to waste the time of anyone willing to try to present the arguments.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ethilrist](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ethilrist/32/4604_2.png) [@Ethilrist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ethilrist)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1076 "2014-09-18T17:20:08Z")

</div>

> [@Smapti](#):
>
> **I believe there are far more black people who are racist towards the cops than vice versa,** and that _actual_ racism by police towards black Americans is exceedingly rare and not the cause of any of the high-profile incidents we’ve seen lately.

Given that the black people in America have the cops outnumbered over 50:1, that’s not too terribly surprising.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fotheringay-Phipps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d9b06d/32.png) [@Fotheringay-Phipps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fotheringay-Phipps)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1077 "2014-09-18T17:21:17Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> I did.

Finally.

> [@](#):
>
> Even if it’s not a Terry stop, I still don’t see how the circumstances qualify as a legitimate detainment/arrest in the Watts case.

What’s this supposed to mean? You “still don’t see” …?

Are you some sort of legal expert? Do you even have the slightest clue as to what grounds the cops need to ask for ID when they have probable cause?

In the unlikely event that you do, please trot it out. “I still don’t see …” adds nothing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smapti](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/smapti/32/17938_2.png) [@Smapti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smapti)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1078 "2014-09-18T17:24:59Z")

</div>

> [@Ethilrist](#):
>
> Given that the black people in America have the cops outnumbered over 50:1, that’s not too terribly surprising.

I meant per capita, not in raw numbers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1079 "2014-09-18T17:25:04Z")

</div>

> [@Fotheringay-Phipps](#):
>
> What’s this supposed to mean? You “still don’t see” …?
> 
> Are you some sort of legal expert? Do you even have the slightest clue as to what grounds the cops need to ask for ID when they have probable cause?
> 
> In the unlikely event that you do, please trot it out. “I still don’t see …” adds nothing.

**Bricker** laid out specifically, in an earlier post, what constitutes a lawful detainment or arrest. The circumstances you describe – a phone-call reporting lewd behavior (a misdemeanor) for Watts and her partner, followed by the cops arriving after any such behavior was complete, does not fit those requirements laid out by **Bricker** for a lawful detainment or arrest.

I’ll see if I can find **Bricker’s** post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2014, 5:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492/1080 "2014-09-18T17:25:28Z")

</div>

> [@Smapti](#):
>
> When there is absolutely zero evidence of a racial motive, or reason to believe one is going to be summarily arrested and handed off to a slavemaster? It absolutely _is_.

Do you think that cops are just as likely to have assumed prostitution if the woman was white?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492.md?page=53)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/kissing-your-husband-while-black-not-if-the-lapd-can-help-it/698492.md?page=55)
