# Lack of sunlight and sunheat = death

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lack-of-sunlight-and-sunheat-death/59840>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [March 28, 2001, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lack-of-sunlight-and-sunheat-death/59840 "2001-03-28T15:48:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AndyKeats](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f4b2a3/32.png) [@AndyKeats](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AndyKeats)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2001, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lack-of-sunlight-and-sunheat-death/59840/1 "2001-03-28T15:48:52Z")

</div>

If the sun were suddenly replaced with an object of approximately equal mass and size that did not emit light or heat, what would happen to the earth? How long would life be able to sustain itself?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scratch1300](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/dfb087/32.png) [@scratch1300](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scratch1300)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2001, 4:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lack-of-sunlight-and-sunheat-death/59840/2 "2001-03-28T16:45:08Z")

</div>

Hm. I was thinking, at least the creatures that live off hydrothermal vents in the deep ocean would be able to survive for billions of years, but a quick search said:

“…such [hydrothermal] ecology as exists on Earth depends largely on oxidants that filter down from the surface of the ocean…” (BBC News).

Would this process maintain without any kind of surface life? Or could evolution make those oxidants unnecessary? I suspect that would be life’s only hope.