# Laid Off Workers Refuse To Leave Chicago Factory!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [December 7, 2008, 12:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068 "2008-12-07T00:16:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 15\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Olentzero](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/90ced4/32.png) [@Olentzero](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Olentzero)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2008, 3:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/21 "2008-12-10T03:07:01Z")

</div>

> [@clairobscur](#):
>
> BBy the way, even though I knew the USA is a different world work-wise, I’m surprised that workers occupying a factory is considered _that_ unusual.

The last time this really happened in the US was the 1930s, the wave of sit-down strikes that won auto workers union recognition in places like Flint, Michigan. I don’t think it happened at all during the 40s or 50s; I wouldn’t be surprised if it happened in the 60s or 70s but no examples come to mind.

Here in the States it _is_ that unusual but I’m damn glad it’s coming around again. More power to the Republic workers.

Moreover, Republic Windows isn’t [closing up shop:](http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-window-company-protest-08-dec08,0,622291.story)

> [@The Chicago Tribune](#):
>
> People who apparently have ties to the financially strapped Republic Windows formed a limited liability corporation in Illinois last month, Echo Windows & Doors, that has bought a similar plant in western Iowa.
> 
> Sharon Gillman, who shares an address with Republic President and CEO Rich Gillman, is listed as an officer of Echo Windows & Doors LLC, which was incorporated in Illinois on Nov. 18, according to secretary of state records.
> 
> Neither she nor Rich Gillman could be reached for comment on Sunday. A secretary who answered the phone at the Iowa plant purchased by Echo said Rich Gillman was not in on Sunday, and that she did not know when he would be in.
> 
> An “[echowindows.com](http://echowindows.com)” Internet domain has been registered, but no content has been placed on the site. The administrative contact on the domain registration is Amy Zimmerman—the same name as the vice president of sales and marketing at Republic.

So Republic Windows finds in BoA’s refusal to provide credit a very convenient excuse to bail out of every obligation and set up shop in a ‘right-to-work’ state where they won’t be forced to deal with unions, leaving its former workforce literally out in the cold.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Olentzero](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/90ced4/32.png) [@Olentzero](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Olentzero)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2008, 3:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/22 "2008-12-11T15:51:50Z")

</div>

Quick update for those still interested: They won. BoA is providing roughly $2 million to cover severance, vacation pay, and health insurance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2008, 4:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/23 "2008-12-11T16:07:55Z")

</div>

> [@clairobscur](#):
>
> It’s not (usually, I don’t know in this particular case) a situation where the company can’t pay the wages and go to the bank to borrow money.

One of my brothers works in Finance. His first job was as treasurer of a corporation, handling between 14 and 42 companies at any given time. One of the tasks he did was figure out, as finely as possible,  
“how much money are we going to get in IOUs by the end of this month,”  
“how much in cash,”  
“how much of the IOUs should we negotiate” (sell the IOUs to banks, at a small % loss),  
“how much of our theoretical cash should we have in CD-type things,”  
and even “can we get a CD for our cash at N% and a loan for the money we need at n%, where in case anybody wasn’t paying attention N\>n?”

The ideal (if scary when it actually happened) situation would be to have at hand exactly as much “cash” (actually money to be e-transferred to employees or turned into IOUs for suppliers) as needed, any “extra” should be loaned out. And if you could get those N% CDs and the n% loans… you did pay the salaries and IOUs from loans.

Now picture that they’d gotten a 3-month N% deposit and had a n% rolling loan. They’d put money from their debtors into paying the loan at the start of the month, then ask for the new amount needed at the end of the month, pay it again. If now the bank suddenly says “rolling loan cancelled” there isn’t any ‘cash’ on hand to pay! Not because the company doesn’t have assets, but because they’re in the deposit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Equipoise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/equipoise/32/151_2.png) [@Equipoise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Equipoise)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2008, 5:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/24 "2008-12-22T17:24:11Z")

</div>

Well, they got their money, and good for them. No matter if the company was wrong or the bank was wrong or who, the workers were victims here and deserved what was coming to them. If they hadn’t taken over the factory, they almost certainly wouldn’t have gotten a cent, so, hooray for having the balls.

[Republic Windows And Doors Employees Get Checks](http://cbs2chicago.com/local/republic.windows.checks.2.891321.html)

Thanks for all the posts in this thread, every one has been interesting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MikeG](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mikeg/32/4329_2.png) [@MikeG](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MikeG)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2008, 5:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/25 "2008-12-22T17:56:29Z")

</div>

The Reader had an interesting [article](http://www.chicagoreader.com/features/stories/theworks/081218/) talking about the 10 Million that the City gave Republic in return for keeping 610 people on their payroll until 2019.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Equipoise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/equipoise/32/151_2.png) [@Equipoise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Equipoise)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2008, 5:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/26 "2008-12-22T17:57:46Z")

</div>

Thanks MikeG, I’ll read that later this evening when I have more time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Olentzero](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/90ced4/32.png) [@Olentzero](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Olentzero)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2008, 6:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/27 "2008-12-22T18:04:41Z")

</div>

> [@Equipoise](#):
>
> If they hadn’t taken over the factory, they almost certainly wouldn’t have gotten a cent, so, hooray for having the balls.

Hear, hear!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![treis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bc79bd/32.png) [@treis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/treis)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2008, 7:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/28 "2008-12-22T19:11:22Z")

</div>

[This](http://www.suntimes.com/business/1332153,republic-windows-doors-bankruptcy-121508.article) sun times article has a bit more information:

> [@](#):
>
> “Republic had lost $10 million the past two years and had maxed out on its $5 million line of credit.”

There was no yanking of a line of credit or modifying any loan terms by BoA. It sucks that the owners didn’t pay the workers, but that really had nothing to do with BoA. I’m happy that the workers got the money they deserved, but what they did was wrong. They used some opportunistic politicians to essentially rob BoA of money that they had no right to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Olentzero](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/90ced4/32.png) [@Olentzero](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Olentzero)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2008, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/29 "2008-12-22T22:23:54Z")

</div>

No right to back wages? No right to accrued vacation pay? No right to any of the money they were owed for the work they did?

Horsehockey. They got what they deserved. I’d like to say I’m sorry your delicate free-market sensibilities are offended by their victory, but I’d be lying because it’s those same free-market sensibilities that almost left them hanging in the first place. I shed no tears for the dented pocketbooks of BoA because if they’d had their way, those workers would have had a lousy Christmas just to start with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![treis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bc79bd/32.png) [@treis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/treis)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2008, 11:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/30 "2008-12-22T23:20:12Z")

</div>

> [@Olentzero](#):
>
> No right to back wages? No right to accrued vacation pay? No right to any of the money they were owed for the work they did?

Of course they have a right to that money, but they don’t have a right to take it out of my pocket.

> [@Olentzero](#):
>
> Horsehockey. They got what they deserved. I’d like to say I’m sorry your delicate free-market sensibilities are offended by their victory, but I’d be lying because it’s those same free-market sensibilities that almost left them hanging in the first place. I shed no tears for the dented pocketbooks of BoA because if they’d had their way, those workers would have had a lousy Christmas just to start with.

It has nothing to do with free-market sensibilities. It has everything to do with basic values of right and wrong. One of those basic values is that it is wrong to take money that doesn’t belong to you. That’s what it boils down to. BoA had no moral or legal obligation to these workers, and it was wrong that they were coerced into paying up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Olentzero](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/90ced4/32.png) [@Olentzero](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Olentzero)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2008, 11:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/31 "2008-12-22T23:41:15Z")

</div>

It’s also wrong to cheat hard-working people out of their wages and benefits. BoA execs aren’t risking not having food on the table as a result of Republic pulling up stakes and heading to Iowa. Which wrong outweighs the other?

I get that you don’t see it the same way. I understand you’re looking at it from the perspective of Ebenezer Scrooge (and I say that in all seriousness) rather than the Good Samaritan. And I think you’re completely wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![treis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bc79bd/32.png) [@treis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/treis)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2008, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/32 "2008-12-23T00:07:04Z")

</div>

> [@Olentzero](#):
>
> It’s also wrong to cheat hard-working people out of their wages and benefits. BoA execs aren’t risking not having food on the table as a result of Republic pulling up stakes and heading to Iowa. Which wrong outweighs the other?

It is possible to think that more than one party is wrong in this situation. The execs were wrong to cheat the workers out of their wages. The workers were wrong to coerce an innocent 3rd party into paying them. It’s a cliche, but two wrongs don’t make a right. The workers aren’t justified in wronging BoA because Republic wronged them.

> [@Olentzero](#):
>
> I get that you don’t see it the same way. I understand you’re looking at it from the perspective of Ebenezer Scrooge (and I say that in all seriousness) rather than the Good Samaritan. And I think you’re completely wrong.

I don’t recall the Good Samaritan robbing another traveler in the story. What message are you trying to send here? That if you are wronged, it’s ok to take money from a 3rd party to make up for it? Only, of course, if that 3rd party happens to be a faceless corporation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Olentzero](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/90ced4/32.png) [@Olentzero](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Olentzero)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2008, 1:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/33 "2008-12-23T01:20:07Z")

</div>

BoA funded Republic and were therefore just as responsible for getting the workers their wages as Republic was. In fact they were more involved in the workers’ lives than the Samaritan was in the life of the victim he found. So they weren’t ‘innocent’, as you claim. You’d have a stronger point if the workers demanded those funds from Citibank or Wachovia, who had nothing to do with extending credit to Republic, but that’s not the case here. BoA’s credit ensured Republic stayed open and the workers had jobs, so they had just as much responsibility towards those workers as Republic did. In fact their denial of credit to Republic was a factor in precipitating this crisis over which the workers had no control (until they took over the factory), so it cannot be claimed that BoA was an innocent third party in this matter. The workers didn’t rob BoA, but if BoA hadn’t provided the funding demanded, they certainly would have robbed the workers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2008, 4:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/34 "2008-12-23T04:48:49Z")

</div>

> [@Olentzero](#):
>
> BoA funded Republic and were therefore just as responsible for getting the workers their wages as Republic was.

So you expect banks to oversee the finances of all companies that they lend money to? :dubious:

Good luck proposing that bit of legislation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Olentzero](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/90ced4/32.png) [@Olentzero](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Olentzero)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2008, 12:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068/35 "2008-12-23T12:10:09Z")

</div>

No, I expect BoA not to get away with saying “Tough shit, Jack” when their actions cause a company to pull up stakes and leave its former employees literally out in the cold.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/laid-off-workers-refuse-to-leave-chicago-factory/476068.md?page=1)
