# Learn to use the word LITERALLY!! AHHHH!!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 4, 2001, 3:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396 "2001-11-04T03:43:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kamandi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5daacb/32.png) [@Kamandi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kamandi)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2001, 9:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/21 "2001-11-04T21:12:00Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by CyberHippy \*  
> **This is one of those annoying ways that crap from TV shows can sneak its way into our vocabulary, giving those of us who don’t watch the show being referenced some really awkward moments. I think the “literally” thing is from a recurring Saturday Night Live skit.**

I think it was literally **Mad TV**. That skit literally makes me vomit until my spine literally comes out of my mouth. Literally.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPWhite](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d26b3c/32.png) [@DPWhite](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPWhite)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2001, 9:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/22 "2001-11-04T21:19:49Z")

</div>

Drives me bananas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ignatzmouse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/b2d939/32.png) [@ignatzmouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ignatzmouse)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2001, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/23 "2001-11-04T22:01:53Z")

</div>

Dan Rather during the first shuttle landing:

> [@](#):
>
> Columbia has landed literally on a dime.

Isn’t it ironic?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Bird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Little\_Bird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Bird)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2001, 3:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/24 "2001-11-05T03:48:16Z")

</div>

[Inigo]  
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.  
[/Inigo]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lolo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/f475e1/32.png) [@Lolo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lolo)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2001, 3:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/25 "2001-11-05T15:22:31Z")

</div>

I too am immeasurably bothered by the misuse of literally. I find the unnecessary use quite insufferable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Feynn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ecb155/32.png) [@Feynn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Feynn)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2001, 3:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/26 "2001-11-05T15:32:27Z")

</div>

Little Bird - you literally beat me to it.

I guess I am going to have to find a source of quotes that no-one else knows…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stanislaus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stanislaus/32/3391_2.png) [@Stanislaus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stanislaus)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2001, 6:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/27 "2001-11-05T18:54:27Z")

</div>

My favourite/most abhorred version of this is, “I literally died” not merely because of the manifest untruth of the statement but because mere utterance of it demonstrates convincingly how richly deserved that outcome would have been.

The fact that people have been making this same mistake for years is only really useful as a refutation of the idea that modern education isn’t a patch on the stuff we had x years ago, where x is approximately the age of the speaker minus 10. People were stupid then, they’re stupid now. Pointing to other stupid people and saying “Hey, they’re doing it too” is an argument, sure, but not necessarily a convincing one.

Arguing that “literally” has a figurative meaning is either disingenuous or wilfully ignorant - “Words mean what I want them to mean, neither more nor less” if I may misquote Humpty Dumpty. Is “literally” the only word with an entirely antonymous figurative meaning? How about “figuratively”? Sure, it literally means figuratively, but figuratively it means “literally”. Why not?  
“I stormed out and figuratively slammed the door behind me.”  
What other words can we assign figurative meanings too? Can anyone do it? (“Anyone” literally - in the figurative sense- means Richard the Lionheart, by the way. Just to clear up any possible confusion - by which I mean literally any possible oilstains)

It’s madness. Words mean what they say they mean. We use them to express ideas with clarity. The more meanings we assign any given word, the more ambiguity creeps in. I hate that. I wouldn’t mind if it strode in, took the best seat and the last cold beer and said “Hi, I’m ambiguity.” Which wouldn’t exactly be in character.

AMR

Oh, and inflammable is the correct usage. “In-” in this case is not a negative. It means “capable of going up **in flam** es”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sailor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a587f6/32.png) [@sailor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sailor)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2001, 7:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/28 "2001-11-05T19:28:17Z")

</div>

Yup, inflammable is correct but it has fallen out of use in favor of flammable because many people thought it meant unflammable which is the opposite. We still say to “inflame” though or “inflamming”. Like induce and other words, the prefix is not a negation but it means “in” here (into flames).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Munch](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/munch/32/5281_2.png) [@Munch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Munch)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2001, 9:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/29 "2001-11-05T21:54:23Z")

</div>

I’d just like to take this time to mention that I literally loathe the 😃 smilie.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![darkcool](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/5f8ce5/32.png) [@darkcool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/darkcool)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2001, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/30 "2001-11-05T23:52:43Z")

</div>

(Steps in front of all the flame-throwers aimed this way and says…)  
I think you guys are a little uptight about this. I use it in this way frequently for effect.  
When you hear someone say, “That bastard owes me money.” Do you get all upset that the person in question is not really illegitimate?  
Or, “I’ve got a million things to do.” Do you really think to yourselves, ‘he/she dosn’t really have a _million_ things to do’, that bothers me that they’ve used that word wrongly?  
Try this: “When I saw him, I just about had a cow!” Really? Were they _this_ close to literally having an actual cow? No. Were you bothered by their lying?  
There are countless examples. WAY too many to mention. Read Dave Barry.

Not funny - He irritates me.  
Funny - He drives me up the wall.  
Funnier - He literally drives me up the wall.

Not all conversation strives to live up to Strunk and White.  
It causes you to have a mental image of something (funny) that can’t really happen. Comedians use this type of thing all the time when they say, “This is a true story…”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rilchiam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/2bfe46/32.png) [@Rilchiam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rilchiam)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2001, 11:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/31 "2001-11-06T11:03:02Z")

</div>

What literally twists the knife is when they pronounce it “lit-tral-ly” instead of “lit-er-al-ly”. That literally makes my ears bleed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Homebrew](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/c89c15/32.png) [@Homebrew](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Homebrew)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2001, 3:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/32 "2001-11-06T15:56:12Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by darkcool \*  
> **Or, “I’ve got a million things to do.” Do you really think to yourselves, ‘he/she dosn’t really have a _million_ things to do’, that bothers me that they’ve used that word wrongly?**

Of course not. It is obvious from context that the “million” is used figuratively. If the hypothetical speaker had said “I literally have a million things to do,” then they damn well better be able to enumerate them. Otherwise the speaker has misused the word literally.

> [@](#):
>
> **Try this: “When I saw him, I just about had a cow!” Really? Were they _this_ close to literally having an actual cow? No. Were you bothered by their lying?**

Again, the absence of the word “literally” clearly indicates the statement was meant figuratively.

> [@](#):
>
> \*\*Read Dave Barry.
> 
> Not funny - He irritates me.  
> Funny - He drives me up the wall.  
> Funnier - He literally drives me up the wall.\*\*

Just because someone makes a living as a writer doesn’t mean they can’t be wrong. You should read Mark Twain’s critique of “The Deerslayer”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eve](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Eve](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eve)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2001, 4:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/33 "2001-11-06T16:21:30Z")

</div>

“Learn to use the word LITERALLY!!”

—Learn to use WHAT word literally?

[English teacher: “There are two words in the English language one must never use. One of them is ‘swell,’ and the other is ‘lousy.’”

Lucy Ricardo: “What are they?”]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Enderw24](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ba9def/32.png) [@Enderw24](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Enderw24)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2001, 4:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/34 "2001-11-06T16:52:19Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Eve \*  
> \*\*Learn to use WHAT word literally?  
> \*\*

Bird.  
Bird is the word.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pulykamell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pulykamell/32/3166_2.png) [@pulykamell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pulykamell)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2001, 5:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/35 "2001-11-06T17:59:50Z")

</div>

ARGH!!! Nothing but a bunch of pedantic grammarians here, eh? 🙂

Just like **Astro** posted, American Heritage says “literally” as an intensifier has been used for over 100 years.

Here’s the cite:

> [@](#):
>
> Usage Note: For more than a hundred years, critics have remarked on the incoherency of using literally in a way that suggests the exact opposite of its primary sense of “in a manner that accords with the literal sense of the words.” In 1926, for example, H.W. Fowler cited the example “The 300,000 Unionists… will be literally thrown to the wolves.” The practice does not stem from a change in the meaning of literally itselfif it did, the word would long since have come to mean “virtually” or “figuratively”but from a natural tendency to use the word as a general intensive, as in They had literally no help from the government on the project, where no contrast with the figurative sense of the words is intended.

(American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th Edition.)

What is the big deal about using “literally” as an intensifier? Have y’all not heard of hyperbole? Next thing is you’re gonna get on my balls for saying “I couldn’t care less” and “I could care less” are both OK. And yes they are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Podkayne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/edb3f5/32.png) [@Podkayne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Podkayne)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2001, 7:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/36 "2001-11-06T19:48:14Z")

</div>

The use of literally as an intesifier is bad because it not _needed_ as an intesifier (we alread have “really” and “totally”), and using it as such weakens a word that does serve a purpose.

“Literally,” in its _useful_ sense, means, “Even though my statement may seem unbelievable or be couched in terms of a common figurative expression, I am _not_ using hyperbole or speaking figuratively.” If “literally” is routinely tacked on to hyperbole, from the mildest to the most outrageous, it loses its meaning as a marker of a literal statement.

If I say, “The pain was so bad I was literally curled up in a ball,” the listener is left to wonder, “Does Podkayne really understand the word ‘literally?’ Was she actually curled up in a ball, or is she just exaggerating?”

If I say, “He has literally thousands of CDs in his collection,” the listener wonders, “Really? Thousands? Or does he just have a lot?”

So now if I make a literal statement that might be confused with an exaggeration or a figurative expression, I can either use “literally” and hope that the listener doesn’t think I’m an illiterate moron–or that he isn’t an unlettered buffoon himself–or I can append all statements with, “No, really, I really mean it.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DarrenS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/977dab/32.png) [@DarrenS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DarrenS)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2001, 7:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/37 "2001-11-08T07:57:48Z")

</div>

Agree with Podkayne and others in favor of the “keep literally pure” camp.

If ‘literally’ gets relegated to a mere intensifier, how do we express that something really, not figuratively, happened?

A few of the “best” ones I’ve heard:

“The stuff I was reading about bin Laden yesterday literally scared the pants off me.”

(these from a realtor)  
“That house is literally a piece of shit.”  
“The garden of their house is literally the 605 freeway.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pulykamell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pulykamell/32/3166_2.png) [@pulykamell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pulykamell)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2001, 12:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/38 "2001-11-08T12:23:28Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> If ‘literally’ gets relegated to a mere intensifier, how do we express that something really, not figuratively, happened?

Are you guys really that uncreative? How about a simple “actually?” Or omitting the “literally” all together?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stanislaus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stanislaus/32/3391_2.png) [@Stanislaus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stanislaus)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2001, 2:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/39 "2001-11-08T14:28:38Z")

</div>

It’s nothing to do with being “uncreative”, actually. It’s to do with wishing to express yourself clearly and accurately and even, if you’re feeling particularly daring, to use nuance to create subtle shades of meaning. This sort of thing becomes difficult when you cannot tell how your audience is going to interpret what you say. One solution is to surrender and cease to use words which are commonly misused. This strategy only has so much for going for it, as it does tend to tacitly encourage the misuse of words, or perhaps the subversion of words would be a better term.

Consider:  
“The floor was so messy you literally couldn’t see the carpet”.  
“The floor was so messy you actually couldn’t see the carpet”.

Similar in meaning, sure, but different, I would say, in tone. To me, the word “actually” renders the sentence dull, a mere statement of quotidian fact. The word “literally”, on the other hand, suggests a situation so extreme that the reader/listener is not expected to believe it, yet should accept it word for word.

Omitting the “literally” altogether solves nothing, as it leaves our audience guessing whether or not to take this statement literally.

As an exercise, try replacing the last word in the first sentence with the last word in the sentence above. Doesn’t work, does it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Homebrew](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/c89c15/32.png) [@Homebrew](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Homebrew)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2001, 2:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396/40 "2001-11-08T14:55:40Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by pulykamell \*  
> \*\*How about a simple “actually?”

If simpletons can’t keep the meaning of “literally” pure, why will they stop with “actually”?

> [@](#):
>
> Or omitting the “literally” all together?\*\*

As noted before, the word “literally” is used to indicate a statement is literally true, not figurative. Without “literally” a statement can reasonablly be considered figurative. Go back and read **Podkayne** ’s excellent post.

I’ll grant you the point you made in your earlier post that the dictionary, including Merriam-Webster, includes the use of literally as an intensifier.

> [@](#):
>
> Main Entry: lit·er·al·ly  
> Pronunciation: 'li-t&-r&-lE, 'li-tr&-lE, 'li-t&r-lE  
> Function: adverb  
> Date: 1533  
> 1 : in a literal sense or manner : ACTUALLY \<took the remark literally\> \<was literally insane\>  
> 2 : in effect : VIRTUALLY \<will literally turn the world upside down to combat cruelty or injustice – Norman Cousins\>  
> usage Since some people take sense 2 to be the opposite of sense 1, it has been frequently criticized as a misuse. Instead, the use is pure hyperbole intended to gain emphasis, but it often appears in contexts where no additional emphasis is necessary.

I respectfully disagree. I will continue to criticize sense 2 as a misuse. So will these folks

[😛](http://www.mnstate.edu/advocate/archives/opinion-29-8-2.html) (invisible smilie link)  
[🙂](http://cwis.livjm.ac.uk/lan/teaching/japanese/ENGLISH/literal.htm) (another, just for fun)  
[There is even a organized fight against the misuse of literally.](http://www.bubo.co.uk/bcamlit.htm)  
[Important guy from Canada expounds on the subject here.](http://markov.utstat.toronto.edu/fulford/literally.html) _Robert Fulford is a Toronto author, journalist, broadcaster, and editor. He writes a weekly column for The National Post and is a frequent contributor to Toronto Life, Canadian Art, and CBC radio and television. His books include Best Seat in the House: Memoirs of a Lucky Man (1988), Accidental City: The Transformation of Toronto (1995), and Toronto Discovered (1998)._

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/learn-to-use-the-word-literally-ahhhh/91396.md?page=3)
