Julia Roberts, for Erin Brockovich. I said this in another thread, but I just can’t believe that anyone could see both Erin Brockovich and Requiem for a Dream and think that Julia’s performance was more deserving of an Oscar. Just my two cents.
Also, I didn’t think Marisa Tomei gave an Oscar-worthy performance in My Cousin Vinny. The movie was good and she was good in it – better than most people give her credit for – but I still don’t think she deserved an Oscar for it.
I dunno, I liked Forrest Gump and I like it more each time I watch it however. I did like Quiz Show, Pulp Fiction, and The Shawshank Redemption better, however.
My pick? Gladiator. I like the movie, hell I own the movie but it should not have won over it’s fellow nominees (except for Erin Brockovich, i dislike this movie something fierce for some reason). Traffic, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, and Chocolat were better movies (in my opinion of course) as were O Brother Where Art Though, High Fideltiy, and Wonder Boys.
Least Deserved Oscar= When they give Oscars to people that do like lighting and crap like that…Best use of gaffers tape? WTF?? Oh and these artsy fartsy films that suck, like crouching tiger hidden dragon…That movie sucked ass when i saw it yet it won all kinds of shit and had great critic acclaim…It was not the most beliveable flic…I mean running in the tree tops???Give me a damn break…and fuckin give KEVIN SMITH an oscar for once
Sigh. Always the same complaints: Forrest Gump sucked, Titanic sucked, wahhh.
The worst Oscars ever handed out for major categories were certainly all in the 1950s and 1960s; I could name half a dozen movies, easy, that won Best Picture that weren’t within a mile of Titanic’s quality. “Around the World In Eighty Days”? Holy moly.
Least deserved would be Michael Moore for “Bowling in Columbine”. Not because of the subject matter, but because he admitted to staging several parts of the documentary and engaging in poetic/creative license to generate incidents which were not factual but did contribute to the flow of the story. Pretty much shoots down what a documentary is supposed to be as I understand it, yet he was given the award and promptly made a horse’s hind end fo himself in the acceptance speech. :rolleyes:
My immediate thought was Broderick Crawford, for his role in All the King’s Men. He “just played himself,” as was discovered in the movies he made after he won the Oscar. Apparently the character was a perfect fit for the guy.
I’m probably going to be in the minority here, but I cannot understand how Catherine Zeta-Jones won for Chicago. I thought her performance was mediocre. The only place where I thought she did a decent job was the scene in the jail where she is so desperately trying to cling to her old act and impress Roxie. Other than that, she just did a lot of hammy scenery chewing. It was so over the top that it was annoying, at least to me. I enjoyed Chicago, but I really hated her in that role.
Best Actor: Gary Cooper’s monotone performance in Sergeant York (1941), which shoved aside Orson Welles’ brilliance in Citizen Kane. Best Actress: Mary Pickford’s Southern-style ham in Coquette (1929). Best Supporting Actor: Walter Brennan in Kentucky (1938), all the make-up and old man mannerisms make him Best Supporting Actor of 1908. Best Supporting Actress: Judi Dench in Shakespeare in Love (1998). Half the Oscar was for her elaborate costume, the other half was for determined glaring. Dench is a first-rate actor, but as UncaStuart said, that is just too short of a performance. Runner-up: Claire Trevor’s scene chewing as an alcoholic moll in Key Largo. Best Picture:The Greatest Show on Earth (1952) beat Singin’ in the Rain???
AMEN! I am so glad to see I am not the only person who thinks that one is total garbage! I got the crap beaten out of me in another thread because I opined that the “I will serve under you when you beat me in a fight” was a thinly veiled rape threat!
Scenery was pretty tho… couldn’t follow the damned story for anything… fell asleep twice and finally said oh fuck at the nine zillionth run through the treetops.
I have long held that the supporting actor Oscars are given n the strength of one scene that stands out in the memory of the voters in a very clear way. Hence, Tomei won for “My biological clock is tickin’ like this (stomp stomp stomp)!” Dame Judi won because she stole the show for her 8 minutes of screen time, Kim Basinger won for the look on her face as she stands in the rain having just been wollomped in the face by Russell Crowe and Kevin Spacey won his supporting Oscar for the crucial and amazing last 10-15 minutes of The Usual Suspects.
Hence, it’s hard to argue too hard against supporting votes, at least for me.
My picks, otherwise, have already been named, so no need to rehash.
I thought Catherine Zeta-Jones was the best thing about the movie. Then again, I didn’t think the movie was that fantastic – reasonably good, but not great.
Do you mean José Ferrer? I’ve seen Cyrano de Bergerac twice, and that’s not at all how he speaks, leaving aside the question of whether his performance was Oscar-worthy.
This year, Best Song should NOT have gone to the hobbit movie. The movie did not have the best song, by any argument – it was the weakest of the ones performed at the Oscars. Any of the others would have been a better choice, even the Eugene Levy/Catherine O’Hara song, but the best song imnsho is “Scarlet Tide.” T-Bone Burnett (the composer of the song) has done more with soundtracks than anyone lately, renewing interest in Americana and jumpstarting the careers of many deserving singers and musicians.
I also would have much preferred Triplets for animated feature – it was far more original than Nemo.