# Least Deserving Top Movie

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [May 24, 2002, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695 "2002-05-24T19:21:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![a35362](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3da27b/32.png) [@a35362](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/a35362)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2002, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695/1 "2002-05-24T19:21:23Z")

</div>

From the 5/24 IMDb daily poll:

[“Of the following top ten films in the IMDb’s Top 250 movies, which one least deserves to be there?”](http://poll.imdb.com/Poll/)

_Amelie_’s way in front, but I bet not many people have seen it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Bredin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/96bed5/32.png) [@John\_Bredin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Bredin)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2002, 8:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695/2 "2002-05-24T20:06:26Z")

</div>

“Amelie’s way in front, but I bet not many people have seen it.”

I saw it. It’s not Great Cinema, and it drags a little (too many false endings) but it was entertaining and IMHO worth what I paid to see it.

And before anyone else names it, I thought Titanic was a decent movie. 🙂 Nothing to write home about, but IMHO not even close to being a stinker either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anamorphic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/anamorphic/32/3057_2.png) [@Anamorphic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Anamorphic)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2002, 8:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695/3 "2002-05-24T20:40:29Z")

</div>

I’d say Amelie or LOTR. Not because either of them are _bad_ films, just that I don’t think either of them quite holds up to the rest of that pretty impressive list.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astorian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ad7895/32.png) [@astorian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astorian)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2002, 8:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695/4 "2002-05-24T20:56:58Z")

</div>

Before I even looked, somehow I KNEW “Lord of the Rings” would be in the top ten, and NOT because it was a great movie- just because the kind of person who worships J.R.R. Tolkien is the same kind of person who casts millions of votes for his favorite movie on Internet sites.

I haven’t seen “Amelie,” but from what I’ve heard of it, it’s far too lightweight to deserve such a high ranking.

Frankly, I think “Citizen Kane” is highly overrated, too.

But “LOTR” is definitely the one that needs to be taken down a few pegs. I enjoyed it, but it’s not a masterpiece by any means.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MovieMogul](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f08c70/32.png) [@MovieMogul](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MovieMogul)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2002, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695/5 "2002-05-24T22:00:29Z")

</div>

_The Professional_ (#63)  
_The Green Mile_ (#93)  
_Attack of the Clones_ (#129)  
_Arsenic and Old Lace_ (#147)  
_Forrest Gump_ (#160)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2002, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695/6 "2002-05-24T22:01:24Z")

</div>

Okay, let’s look at movies 11 through 30, i.e. those that have been bumped downward by _Amelie_ (which I thoroughly agree is the least deserving of the top ten films listed).

11 - Memento  
12 - Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb  
13 - One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest  
14 - Rear Window  
15 - Usual Suspects, The  
16 - Raiders of the Lost Ark  
17 - Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back  
18 - Pulp Fiction  
19 - Psycho (1960)  
20 - American Beauty  
21 - North by Northwest  
22 - Silence of the Lambs, The  
23 - 12 Angry Men (1957)  
24 - It’s a Wonderful Life  
25 - Goodfellas  
26 - Lawrence of Arabia  
27 - Buono, il brutto, il cattivo, Il (1966) (i.e., Good, Bad, & Ugly)  
28 - Sunset Blvd.  
29 - Vertigo  
30 - Paths of Glory

Which of these should go in _Amelie_’s slot?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MovieMogul](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f08c70/32.png) [@MovieMogul](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MovieMogul)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2002, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695/7 "2002-05-24T22:05:30Z")

</div>

Whoops, misread the OP. As for Top 10 ejects, I gotta go with either _Star Wars_ or _Amelie_, and as for Cervaise’s question, without a doubt:

**Vertigo**

(though I wouldn’t have too strong an objection to any of the pre-1970 ones listed there)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Manduck](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/manduck/32/256_2.png) [@Manduck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Manduck)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2002, 10:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695/8 "2002-05-24T22:10:43Z")

</div>

I haven’t seen most of the movies in the list, but I have seen The Shawshank Redemption. I would say it’s a good movie, but ranking it as the second best of all time is a little crazy.

I haven’t seen all the movies in Cervaise’s list either, but of those I have seen, the ones that could take Amelie’s slot (assuming Amelie doesn’t deserve it - I haven’t seen that either :)) are nos 12, 13, 14, 19, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29 and 30. If you held a gun to my head I guess I would narrow it to Dr. Strangelove or Sunset Boulevard.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rjung](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/45deac/32.png) [@rjung](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rjung)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2002, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695/9 "2002-05-24T23:11:35Z")

</div>

I’ll vote for _Gone with the Wind._ Borrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr-ing!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![a35362](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3da27b/32.png) [@a35362](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/a35362)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2002, 3:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695/10 "2002-05-25T03:57:41Z")

</div>

How would such a recent movie get to the top of the heap anyway? IMDb’s Top 250 seems to be subject to a lot of newer or younger users voting for the last movie they’ve seen and enjoyed (not to take anything away from a well-liked movie).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2002, 4:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695/11 "2002-05-25T04:16:09Z")

</div>

I’d say a lot of the moives in the top 250 list are insane selections; I would know where to start.

“The Shawshank Redemption” is not the second best movie of all time, and in fact is not the 302nd best movie of all time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KarlGauss](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karlgauss/32/3713_2.png) [@KarlGauss](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KarlGauss)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2002, 5:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695/12 "2002-05-25T05:09:08Z")

</div>

Ever since I saw that **The Shawshank Redemption** was number 2 at the IMDB’s top 250 list, I lost interest. It was a good, entertaining movie alright. But in the top ten? Of all time? Puhleeze.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jabba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/b5e925/32.png) [@Jabba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jabba)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2002, 1:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/least-deserving-top-movie/110695/13 "2002-05-25T13:35:13Z")

</div>

_The Shawshank Redemption_ stands out, being at number 2. I enjoyed _Lord of the Rings_ but not as the third best film ever ( and anyway it’s far too soon to tell). _Schindler’s List_ and _Casablanca_ are both good, but not that good and _Star Wars_ and _Amelie_ are both far too lightweight for such high rankings. The 11-30 list contains some worthy replacements: the Hitchcock films, the Kubrick pair and _Sunset Boulevard_ ( Wilder’s best film, I think). But what is missing from this, and most, popular polls are foreign-language films ( the sublime _Seven Samurai_ is there, of course, along with _Amelie_ but what about _La Grande Illusion_ or _La Regle du Jeu_, _Wild Strawberries, Tokyo Story, Sansho the Bailiff_ or _L’Atalante_) and silent films ( _Battleship Potemkin, October, Intolerance, The Cabinet of Dr Caligari, Nosferatu, Napoleon_ or _The Passion of Joan of Arc_).
