Left-wing bloggers are just as mad as the right-wingers are at the MSM

Great Debates
21

[QUOTE=Martini Enfield]
The question I often wonder is “Does anyone actually care what some random internet person with a Blog thinks?”
[/QUOTE]

Apparently.

22

[QUOTE=Weirddave]
Or facts I suppose. I notice you just walked away from the last thread we were both in when you couldn’t document your claims. At least RTF admitted he had no proof before quiting the thread.
[/QUOTE]
Ah, second GD thread in a row where I get to point out you’re a liar.

You’re a liar.

23

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]
Righty bloggers question the civic value of journalism as such.
[/QUOTE]
Except as a rightful tool of those in authority to keep people in line.

24

[QUOTE=Weirddave]
At least RTF admitted he had no proof before quiting the thread.
[/QUOTE]
Oh, and Weirddave? If you want to respond to something I said in one GD thread, the appropriate place is either (a) in that thread, or (b) the Pit.

25

[QUOTE=Martini Enfield]
The question I often wonder is “Does anyone actually care what some random internet person with a Blog thinks?”

I certainly don’t, but your results can and probably do vary…
[/QUOTE]
No, very few people care what a random internet person with a blog thinks. Caring about someone like that is like caring about what Ward Churchill thinks.

But we’re not talking about random people with blogs; we’re talking about those who’ve been able to build a following. The three people I quoted, one’s on the conventional airwaves, and the other two are pretty well known in Right Blogistan, and show up on the blogrolls of people you have heard of, such as Michelle Malkin.

26

[QUOTE=Weirddave]
I notice you just walked away from the last thread we were both in when you couldn’t document your claims.
[/QUOTE]

Are you speaking, perhaps, of this thread, where I went on posting a bit longer than you, and where every single thing you posted that can be classified as an assertion was either false, opinion, or meaningless?

27

[QUOTE=RTFirefly]
But we’re not talking about random people with blogs; we’re talking about those who’ve been able to build a following. The three people I quoted, one’s on the conventional airwaves, and the other two are pretty well known in Right Blogistan, and show up on the blogrolls of people you have heard of, such as Michelle Malkin.
[/QUOTE]

Sorry, who? (I’m not joking). :confused:

28

[QUOTE=Martini Enfield]
Sorry, who? (I’m not joking). :confused:
[/QUOTE]
Wikipedia to the rescue.

29

[QUOTE=RTFirefly]
Caring about someone like that is like caring about what Ward Churchill thinks.
[/QUOTE]

For some reason, some people seem to care a great deal about what Ward Churchill thinks.

(I’m reminded of G. Gordon Liddy and Timothy Leary doing the college lecture circuit together in the '80s . . .)

30

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]
For some reason, some people seem to care a great deal about what Ward Churchill thinks.

(I’m reminded of G. Gordon Liddy and Timothy Leary doing the college lecture circuit together in the '80s . . .)
[/QUOTE]

From that link:

An epiphany by Mr. Horowitz? :slight_smile:

31

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]
tsk Come now, RT, you should know better, by now, than to expect any of Weirddave’s posts to be based on any actual knowledge.
[/QUOTE]

Y’know, maybe you ought to back off from making personal observations about other posters in GD. (Yeah, this time your target had participated in the thread, but your comment is still not pertinent to the discussion and is out of line.)

[ /Moderating ]

32

[QUOTE=tomndebb]
Y’know, maybe you ought to back off from making personal observations about other posters in GD. (Yeah, this time your target had participated in the thread, but your comment is still not pertinent to the discussion and is out of line.)

[ /Moderating ]
[/QUOTE]

Chastisement acknowledged.