# Leftist politics another victim of 9/11 attack

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [September 4, 2003, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593 "2003-09-04T20:34:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 12\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Otto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/bbe5ce/32.png) [@Otto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Otto)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2003, 9:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593/21 "2003-09-05T21:50:41Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Now back to the original question. Is the political philosphy of the left taking a blow because of post-9/11 realities?

No, it’s because of post-9/11 perceptions. There’s a great series of articles in the latest issue of The American Prospect under the heading “How Republicans Hijack Language” that talks about all of this. Haven’t read all the way through it yet but what I’ve read so far has been fascinating.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2003, 11:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593/22 "2003-09-05T23:25:11Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Instead, those who bat from the left side of the plate apparently saw the post as the opening shot in an idealogical shooting match.

You might want to go back and actually read your thread, here. This thread was immediately spun off course by partisans from the Right before any Lefties actually had a chance to post.

(This is why all the whining by a few Right-wingers that the SDMB is a “Liberal” board always sets me chuckling. I think there is a pretty good mix of Right, Left, Middle Course, Libertarian, and Not-Easily-Classified viewpoints expressed with many thoughtful posters (and a few who type by jerking their knees) representing all of those perspectives, yet anything that happens to a Right-leaning thread–even when it is bombed by those on the Right–is immediately presented as evidence that the Left wing won’t play nice.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_One](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/45deac/32.png) [@Evil\_One](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_One)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2003, 2:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593/23 "2003-09-06T02:30:40Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Sterra \*  
> \*\*One good way to test this theory is see how well Bush is doing. For example CNN released these poll numbers on Inside Politics
> 
> 29% would definitely vote to re-elect Bush.
> 
> 41% would definitely vote against Bush.  
> 9-11 wont be nearly as important a political event as Iraq is. \*\*

What was the margin of error?

Was the survey conducted nationwide or in a fairly liberal area such as New York or California?

Was it of people in general or registered voters?

The answers to any or all of these questions affect the relevance of the poll. The election is too far away to call now…but I will go out on a limb and predict Bush’s reelection.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_One](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/45deac/32.png) [@Evil\_One](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_One)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2003, 2:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593/24 "2003-09-06T02:35:24Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Otto \*  
> \*\*No, it’s because of post-9/11 perceptions. There’s a great series of articles in the latest issue of The American Prospect under the heading “How Republicans Hijack Language” that talks about all of this. Haven’t read all the way through it yet but what I’ve read so far has been fascinating. \*\*

Given the title of the article I’m sure it’s completely objective. Both parties hijack the language. It’s up to us to educate ourselves on the issues and select who is full of the least amount of shit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_One](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/45deac/32.png) [@Evil\_One](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_One)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2003, 2:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593/25 "2003-09-06T02:37:37Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Evil One \*  
> \*\*  
> Now ask yourself…those of which political philosophy are most likely to oppose increased military or CIA spending? Who would call the closer monitoring of young arab men from countries known to be hostile “racial profiling”? Who would think that telling the CIA it can’t deal with informants with criminal records is a good thing? Who thinks that CIA paramilitary teams are a bad thing? And who is more concerned about the civil rights of hostile prisoners than with the information they possess that might prevent many more American deaths?  
> \*\*

With one exception, the silence in regard to these questions is quite impressive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2003, 4:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593/26 "2003-09-06T04:52:16Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Who would call the closer monitoring of young arab men from countries known to be hostile “racial profiling”?

Of course, since the people who have actually _attacked_ the U.S. all came from countries that have been declared exempt from such inspections because they are our “friends,” racial profiling would seem to be an accurate description (and the policy is clearly a bad joke).

I would certainly agree that the extreme Right is currently in ascendance in the U.S. Of course, they had another moment of glory a number of years ago amid the Red Scare–leading to the abuses by the CIA and other agencies that, in turn, led to the reining in of those groups’ powers. Political winds blow fickle and if the people begin to perceive that the administration is manipulating the situation for private gain while endangering the freedoms of the citizens, the winds will shift again, leading to a new curbing of the current powers. It has far more to do with perception than reality, because that is how power is gained and lost in a more or less democratic state.

It is mostly a matter of the pendulum swinging back and forth with little in the way of actual knowledge or wisdom being gained or expressed by either the leaders or the electorate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_One](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/45deac/32.png) [@Evil\_One](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_One)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2003, 8:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593/27 "2003-09-06T20:31:02Z")

</div>

You and I are in agreement about a large portion of your post, Tom. Since the majority of people in the country are not willing to make the effort to understand the issues, perception is more important than reality. I also believe in the pendulum theory to a degree. 40’s and 50’s-conservative, 60’s and 70’s-liberal, 80’s-conservative. The 90’s? A mixture of both, I think, but slighty conservative. So logically following the pattern, the “O’s” (my nomination to call the decade we are in now) should be more liberal. But the 9/11 attacks were so culturally shocking that the relevance of many of the hallmarks of societal conservatism was increased. And just as the idea that the group was more important than the individual began during WWII and continued through the 50’s, I think the same scenario is present today. Until the majority of Americans feel safe about the world, they will not value the individual over the group. And I think that idea is essential to much of the liberal philosophy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_One](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/45deac/32.png) [@Evil\_One](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_One)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2006, 8:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593/28 "2006-02-20T20:32:49Z")

</div>

I’m bumping this thread from September of 2003 because interest in the topic has apparently come up again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rjung](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/45deac/32.png) [@rjung](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rjung)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2006, 8:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593/29 "2006-02-20T20:56:16Z")

</div>

It was a stupid OP from the get-go, and the passage of time hasn’t made it (nor you) and less stupid.

How’s that for a response? 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_One](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/45deac/32.png) [@Evil\_One](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_One)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2006, 9:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593/30 "2006-02-20T21:03:03Z")

</div>

> [@rjung](#):
>
> How’s that for a response?

In character for you, rjung. I did this in response to developments within [this thread.](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=359244)

Thanks for the assist in proving Airman’s point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2006, 9:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593/31 "2006-02-20T21:50:34Z")

</div>

Braiiiiins…BRAAAAIIINNS!.. **Evil One** has a point in some respects - I think leftists and Democrats are readjusting their outlooks in ways that the right didn’t have to, and in some cases it’s lead to really confused reversals of opinion - but that’s been discussed elsewhere (without the gloating in the OP) and I don’t see why we’re resurrecting a two and a half year-old thread to discuss it. I think that show a lack of BRAAAAINNS…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2006, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593/32 "2006-02-20T22:00:32Z")

</div>

> [@Evil One](#):
>
> I’m bumping this thread from September of 2003 because interest in the topic has apparently come up again.

And I am closing it because, (as with most zombie threads) there are submissions by posters who are no longer here to defend their positions or themselves.

Feel free to open a new thread with a link to this one.

[/Moderating]

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/leftist-politics-another-victim-of-9-11-attack/199593.md?page=1)
