# Legal Question: How does a Jury "Disregard" Obvious Evidence

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [April 24, 2007, 5:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483 "2007-04-24T17:45:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 3:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/21 "2007-04-25T15:04:19Z")

</div>

I suspect the point is that, while there is no doubt that the victims are dead, and these bodies are theirs, the police won’t be able to bring any evidence of where they were found, or of what else they found in the house, and all of that evidence might link the defendants more strongly to the crime. Presumably the defense is going to be that there is insufficient evidence that the defendants committed the crime, and that someone else (unidentified) might have done it, not that no crime took place.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 3:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/22 "2007-04-25T15:14:29Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Baffle]  
I must be living under a rock.  
[/QUOTE]  
Me too. I read the news regularly, but I skip over stuff like this. People randomly do horrible things all the time. But it’s not interesting for me to read about it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leaffan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/leaffan/32/299_2.png) [@Leaffan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leaffan)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 3:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/23 "2007-04-25T15:24:19Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Baffle]  
I must be living under a rock.  
[/QUOTE]

Christ, I live in Canada and know all about this case. 😕

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Slant](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c57346/32.png) [@Mr.Slant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Slant)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 3:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/24 "2007-04-25T15:34:18Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=ralph124c]  
The point is, you would have to be living under a rock, not to know that Entwhistle’s wife’s and daughters bodies were found by the police 9who were investigating a missing persons report). So, if you are a juror, and the defense lawyer objects, how are you supposed to deal with the evidence? They can say: the police did enter the house, they did find bodies, but this evidence must NOT be considered? truly bizarre!  
[/QUOTE]

Who is Entwhistle?  
I’ve never heard of this guy.  
You can find 11 more like me somewhere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jodi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7feea3/32.png) [@Jodi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jodi)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 3:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/25 "2007-04-25T15:42:24Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Mr. Slant]  
Who is Entwhistle?  
I’ve never heard of this guy.  
You can find 11 more like me somewhere.  
[/QUOTE]

But your jury pool isn’t made up of people out there somewhere. In most cases, it’s made up of people living in the community where the crime occurred. I think you would be hard-pressed to find many people in Boston who haven’t heard of the Entwistle case.

Reminds me of an old David Letterman joke about the massive media coverage of the OJ case. He was commenting on the defense’s desire to find 12 jurors who had not heard of the OJ case and asked, “How are they going to find 12 Amish people living in LA?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gfactor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9de053/32.png) [@Gfactor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gfactor)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 3:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/26 "2007-04-25T15:46:38Z")

</div>

**ralph124c** as others have pointed out, and as was pointed out in the previous thread, most of the big evidentiary issues are resolved before trial. Of course, some issues come up at trial by surprise, and sometimes the judges change their minds.

It’s possible the trial judge could deny the motion to suppress evidence based on the a bad warrant and reconsider the decision later on, based on a subsequent motion or trial objection.

Ideally this decision would happen before any evidence was introduced before the jury, but again, it’s possible the cat gets out of the bag before the ruling. It’s also likely that the prosecutor would have mentioned the evidence in an opening statement. Opening statements aren’t evidence, but can still result in trial prejudice under the right conditions.

In cases like that, the court has a few choices:

1. Curative or limiting instructions (“The jury will discregard all references to the smoking gun found in his hand at the time he was arrested”) or (“The prosecutor referred to bodies found at the defendant’s house. Statements of counsel are not evidence, and no evidence has been introduced on this point.”)

2. Mistrial. [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=nh&vol=0308\remic107&invol=1](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=nh&vol=0308%5Cremic107&invol=1) ; [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=394&invol=731](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=394&invol=731) ; [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=in&vol=app\09240301.jgb&invol=2](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=in&vol=app%5C09240301.jgb&invol=2) (as you can see, mistrials are hard to get). A mistrial solves the tainted jury problem by getting a new one–or under some circumstances–ending the case. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/02/09/MNGLQO1LRS1.DTL](http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/02/09/MNGLQO1LRS1.DTL)

3. A directed verdict of acquittal on some or all of the charges. If the evidence is very significant, and the court ultimately excludes it, the prosecution may not be able to prove its case. For example, a screw up that gets the body and most of the physical evidence excluded will present significant problems for the prosecution. The prosecution may not even be able to prove that the victim is really dead. If the court concludes that no reasonable jury could convict ([http://www.boulder-bar.org/bar\_media/trial/12.6.html](http://www.boulder-bar.org/bar_media/trial/12.6.html) ) the court can take the case (or part of it) from the jury. Here’s a case where that happened (sort of): [http://coa.nmcourts.com/documents/opinions/Gomez%20Ro.pdf](http://coa.nmcourts.com/documents/opinions/Gomez%20Ro.pdf)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Valgard](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/7feea3/32.png) [@Valgard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Valgard)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 3:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/27 "2007-04-25T15:50:36Z")

</div>

I served as jury foreman in federal court last year and we were quite good at making our decision based only on the evidence. We spent a lot of time arguing and debating various things and any time somebody would bring up something that wasn’t entered into evidence there would always be someone else ready to say “But we can’t use that”.

I seem to recall once or twice during court proceedings that the judge turned to us and said “The jury will disregard that” but it wasn’t for anything major, and we certainly didn’t use it.

We had some big questions (such as why the case was being brought 8 years after the events in question) which we were able to ask the prosecutor after the case was over - turned out that the defendant had been on the run for 8 years, changing his identity constantly. For whatever reason that was not allowed to be mentioned in court so we didn’t know it during our deliberations; the question came up (“Why are they doing this now?”) but it wasn’t part of our decision making process.

So to answer the OP specifically, the jury doesn’t “erase” something from their minds, but if they are doing their jobs they know that they can’t use it to make their decision. If the jury I served on was representative, juries are quite capable of doing that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 6:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/28 "2007-04-25T18:59:12Z")

</div>

> [@Valgard](#):
>
> We had some big questions (such as why the case was being brought 8 years after the events in question) which we were able to ask the prosecutor after the case was over - turned out that the defendant had been on the run for 8 years, changing his identity constantly.

I ask the Great Legal Minds of the SDMB (hi, **Jodi** ) - could this have been admitted as evidence of a guilty mind?

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gadarene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Gadarene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gadarene)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 7:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/29 "2007-04-25T19:03:05Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I ask the Great Legal Minds of the SDMB (hi, Jodi) - could this have been admitted as evidence of a guilty mind?

In what respect?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gfactor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9de053/32.png) [@Gfactor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gfactor)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 7:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/30 "2007-04-25T19:13:34Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Shodan]  
I ask the Great Legal Minds of the SDMB (hi, **Jodi** ) - could this have been admitted as evidence of a guilty mind?

Regards,  
Shodan  
[/QUOTE]

Here’s a surprise: It depends. [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=va&vol=1961011&invol=1](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=va&vol=1961011&invol=1); [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=10th&navby=case&no=986224](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=10th&navby=case&no=986224) ; [http://writ.news.findlaw.com/colb/20031119.html](http://writ.news.findlaw.com/colb/20031119.html) ; [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=5th&navby=case&no=9820419cr0](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=5th&navby=case&no=9820419cr0)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gadarene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Gadarene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gadarene)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 7:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/31 "2007-04-25T19:28:55Z")

</div>

Findlaw links aren’t particularly helpful when one isn’t registered for Findlaw, **Gfactor**. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jodi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7feea3/32.png) [@Jodi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jodi)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 7:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/32 "2007-04-25T19:30:36Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Shodan]  
I ask the Great Legal Minds of the SDMB (hi, **Jodi** ) - could this have been admitted as evidence of a guilty mind?

Regards,  
Shodan  
[/QUOTE]

Ha! Thanks for the elevation to GLM/SDMB. 🙂 As to your question, and as **Gfactor** said: Maybe. But the chance that the jury might infer a guilty mind is probably why the evidence of flight was kept out. Flight _can_ support an inference of guilt, but there are other reasons people might flee (like fear of the police or belief they will not receive a fair trial), so it is my understanding that judges look very carefully at flight evidence before allowing it in. They don’t want the jury to place too much weight on the fact the defendant fled, since that alone is not enough to support a verdict of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. A conviction that rested heavily on flight evidence would probably be vulnerable on appeal.

But I say “It is my understanding” because I’ve never practiced criminal law or dealt with a flight issue, and so will defer to those who have.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gfactor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9de053/32.png) [@Gfactor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gfactor)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 7:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/33 "2007-04-25T19:33:44Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Gadarene]  
Findlaw links aren’t particularly helpful when one isn’t registered for Findlaw, **Gfactor**. 🙂  
[/QUOTE]

Heh. Didn’t give me a problem or ask for a login. Allow me to summarize.

Some cases say use of an alias can be introduced as evidence of consciousness of guilt. Most cases say flight can be introduced under some circumstances as evidence of consciousness of guilt. OTOH, admission of the evidence isn’t automatic. Here’s an illustrative statement of the test from one of the cases:

> [@](#):
>
> Evidence of an accused’s flight is generally admissible as tending to establish guilt. See United States v. Williams , 775 F.2d 1295, 1300 (5th Cir. 1985). A flight instruction is proper when the evidence supports four inferences: 1) the defendant’s conduct constituted flight; 2) the defendant’s flight was the result of consciousness of guilt; 3) the defendant’s guilt related to the crime with which he was charged; and, 4) the defendant felt guilty about the crime charged because he, in fact, committed the crime. See United States v. Murphy , 996 F.2d 94, 97 (5th Cir. 1993). Harmless error applies. See United States v. Barnhart , 889 F.2d 1374, 1379 (5th Cir. 1989).

And from another one that I’m not sure I cited:

> [@](#):
>
> “Although flight to avoid prosecution is evidence of another crime, it is nevertheless admissible to show a consciousness of guilt.” Id. at 102, 409 S.E.2d at 479. “Evidence of flight from authorities that occurred days, or even months, after a crime is admissible, as ‘any flight at a time when it may be to avoid arrest, prosecution, or confinement tends to show a consciousness of guilt.’” Ricks v. Commonwealth, 39 Va. App. 330, 335, 573 S.E.2d 266, 268 (2002) (citation omitted). “The remoteness in time of the flight goes to the weight of the evidence and not to its admissibility.” Langhorne, 13 Va. App. at 103, 409 S.E.2d at 480.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Biffy\_the\_Elephant\_Shrew](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e47c2d/32.png) [@Biffy\_the\_Elephant\_Shrew](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Biffy_the_Elephant_Shrew)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 7:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/34 "2007-04-25T19:34:57Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Mr. Slant]  
Who is Entwhistle?  
I’ve never heard of this guy.  
[/QUOTE]

Me neither. Only Entwistle I know of is the late Who bassist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frylock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ce7236/32.png) [@Frylock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frylock)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 8:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/35 "2007-04-25T20:52:00Z")

</div>

I can imagine plausible scenarios in which evidence is excluded which would lead a reasonable jury to find the defendant guilty.

I wonder if it has ever happened that evidence was excluded which would lead a reasonable jury to find the defendant innocent?

So in other words, I can imagine a reasonable juror saying, after a trial, “Well, if I had known that, I would have found the guy guilty!” But has it ever happened that a (reasonable) juror (would have) said, after a trial, "Well, if I had known that, I would have found the guy innocent!

-FrL-

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 9:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/36 "2007-04-25T21:26:32Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Leaffan]  
Christ, I live in Canada and know all about this case. 😕  
[/QUOTE]

So do I and… I don’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yIIa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/9fc348/32.png) [@yIIa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/yIIa)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 10:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/37 "2007-04-25T22:08:13Z")

</div>

I personally wish the “illegally obtained evidence” defence would just be legislated away. Punish overreaching police, but make that a separate case.  
We should have a system based on full truth, not “balanced” partial truths.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gfactor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9de053/32.png) [@Gfactor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gfactor)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 10:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/38 "2007-04-25T22:43:25Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Frylock]  
I wonder if it has ever happened that evidence was excluded which would lead a reasonable jury to find the defendant innocent?  
[/QUOTE]

All the time.

[http://law.wisc.edu/rcid/caselaw/wisconsin/opinions/99-0498.htm](http://law.wisc.edu/rcid/caselaw/wisconsin/opinions/99-0498.htm)

[http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=10th&navby=docket&no=042215](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=10th&navby=docket&no=042215)

> **[Iowa Legal Research & Court Cases: Find IA Opinions at FindLaw](https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/iowa)**
>
> FindLaw provides resources for Iowa legal research including searchable database of the IA Cases : IA Court Opinions - IA Court Decisions

Notice that courts apply different standards to different types of objections and rulings, and that none of the standards matches your formulation exactly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/39 "2007-04-25T22:54:59Z")

</div>

Thanks to all the GLMs/SDMB.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frylock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ce7236/32.png) [@Frylock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frylock)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2007, 11:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483/40 "2007-04-25T23:22:04Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Gfactor]  
All the time.

[http://law.wisc.edu/rcid/caselaw/wisconsin/opinions/99-0498.htm](http://law.wisc.edu/rcid/caselaw/wisconsin/opinions/99-0498.htm)

[http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=10th&navby=docket&no=042215](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=10th&navby=docket&no=042215)

> **[Iowa Legal Research & Court Cases: Find IA Opinions at FindLaw](https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/iowa)**
>
> FindLaw provides resources for Iowa legal research including searchable database of the IA Cases : IA Court Opinions - IA Court Decisions

Notice that courts apply different standards to different types of objections and rulings, and that none of the standards matches your formulation exactly.  
[/QUOTE]

Thanks. I couldn’t look at the last one without a login, but the other two were certainly interesting and relevant.

I should have phrased my request differently: I was looking for cases where evidence was excluded which would have led a reasonable jury to find the defendant innocent, _and_ where it was clear that the exclusion shouldn’t be the basis for a successful appeal.

In other words, I was looking for cases analogous to the ones in which evidence was excluded which would lead a reasonable jury to convict, where the exclusion was legally correct.

-FrL-

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/legal-question-how-does-a-jury-disregard-obvious-evidence/401483.md?page=3)
