- What ugly coding, I apologize.
- The cite to the Satan case is 54 F.R.D. 282 (W. D. Penn 1971); Westlaw is going to be wondering why that case is being accessed all of a sudden all across the country, or not.
Unfortunately, he seems to agree with this assessment as strongly as anyone.
IME, he (and Easterbrook) are complete jerks towards attorneys during oral argument.
As the joke goes, who are the 3 Dicks on the 7th Circuit?
Dick Posner, Dick Cudahy, and Frank Easterbrook.
The reason legal opinions can be very long is the authors don’t have the time to make them short.
A well known Master of the Alberta Queen’s Bench, Master Funduk, recently retired. His decisions on procedural matters, which one would think would be quite dull, have been circulating amongst counsel for over twenty years because of their pointed wit. One of the most frequently cited bit of Fundukia is on the principle of stare decisis:
Here’s another funny line I found from one of my trademark cases:
I dredging up this thread, acsenray, because I have a cite for you. It’s not quite the 1200 pages I used in my example, but I’ll simply say that was hyperbole. The complexity of the case would surely have some impact, but I can’t imagine the detail required to fill 400 pages.
Anyway, there you go.