Let's play a game of logical consistency

Yay! I’m consistent!

Poppet, not giving you an opinion on a poorly quoted statement is what grownups are suppose to do. Unlike some that boldly spew nonsense over poorly understood 2nd or 3rd hand accounts. I mean who would want to do something stupid like that?

Yay! I’m going for lunch!

(Hopefully I’ll find something more appetizing than amorphous pus and goo.)

So no Denny’s, huh?

You are the one who is saying that a fetus is a child. If you are saying that the entirety of a dictionary definition controls what can be called a child for the purposes of the law, then a silly, immature person must also be considered a child for the purposes of the law.

If you disagree with this reasoning, then you are the one being inconsistent.

Yes, but what’s your view the next morning?

Giggity!

Such a perfect setup to answer with something along the lines of “The shore, receding in the distance”. sigh.