# "Liberty Movement" (Ron Paul followers) asserts that it's in the conservative driver's seat

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [December 9, 2012, 8:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528 "2012-12-09T20:17:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2012, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/41 "2012-12-10T19:59:21Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> The Libertarian vote (capital “L”) is about .2% of the electorate, on a good day (or bad day, depending on how you see things). Don’t underestimate the number of TPers who are less interested in social issues than economic ones.

And don’t underestimate the number of Christians in the Republican Party who’d desert any party supporting sin in droves. Santorum got more votes than Ron Paul ever did despite being even crazier.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2012, 8:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/42 "2012-12-10T20:01:06Z")

</div>

> [@For You](#):
>
> I did like the proximity of “pol” and “pot” in your post, though. Sounds like something an ophthalmologist might prescribe for glaucoma, “Paul Pot”.

Bad move. It would starve millions of brain cells.

(I’m so going to hell …)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2012, 8:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/43 "2012-12-10T20:15:16Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> And don’t underestimate the number of Christians in the Republican Party who’d desert any party supporting sin in droves. Santorum got more votes than Ron Paul ever did despite being even crazier.

Perhaps, but, in the general election, those Christian Pubs held their noses and voted for the center-right, impossible-to-pin-down-on-abortion Mormon :eek: – didn’t they? Don’t they always, no matter what sort of sinner the Pub candidate might be?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2012, 9:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/44 "2012-12-10T21:26:40Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> And don’t underestimate the number of Christians in the Republican Party who’d desert any party supporting sin in droves. Santorum got more votes than Ron Paul ever did despite being even crazier.

They can make it up by wrangling in an equal or greater number if Independents + Fiscally Conservative Dems.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Derleth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Derleth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Derleth)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2012, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/45 "2012-12-10T22:00:44Z")

</div>

> [@For You](#):
>
> “Paul Pot”.

Didn’t he run the Khmer Rand?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2012, 10:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/46 "2012-12-10T22:18:06Z")

</div>

> [@Derleth](#):
>
> Didn’t he run the Khmer Rand?

Actually, no; he was with the Viet Bong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9dc877/32.png) [@astro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astro)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 12:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/47 "2012-12-11T00:00:15Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> I’m not so sure about that – despite the fact that the Tea Partiers only ever seem to mention economic or fiscal issues on their rally-signs and in their published platforms, etc. The impression I get is that their mouths/signs say “taxes/deficits/regulation” but their eyes/hearts/whatever say “abortion/immigration/secularism/negroes”.

Your impression is 100% correct.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Titanium\_Dragon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/838e76/32.png) [@Titanium\_Dragon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Titanium_Dragon)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 12:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/48 "2012-12-11T00:56:23Z")

</div>

The trouble is that the libertarians really are idiots if they vote Republican. They really should form their own party, and actually vote for it. Would they ever win the presidency? No.

But at the current rate, the Republican party won’t ever do that either. Their base is literally dying off, and when you see 60%+ of young people voting Democrat, that bodes very badly for the party. Especially if in 20 years Texas actually goes blue, as the demographics are trending - if/when that happens, and the Republicans haven’t coped, then they’re effectively going to be dead as a party, as they won’t have anything.

Really there are two things that can happen:

The Republicans can stay their current course. If they do that, come about 2020, they will have lost control of all three branches of government on essentially a permanent basis. This is not really stable, and will most likely lead to either a splintering of the party or a rebranding of it. Either could be effective, but a rebranding is likely to be very difficult because of the nature of the system; if the party actually disintegrates, though, into, say, the libertarians, the christian fundies, and the business branch, the business branch could potentially pick up some votes from the Democrats and become a second viable party, while the Christian/Libertarian groups would probably die pretty fast, or become permanent also-rans; they could never win the presidency, but they’d probably get some house seats in the south, and some senate seats as well, at least potentially.

The libertarians can split off from the Republicans. This will cause the Republicans to lose control of all three branches of government immediately, but will raise the profile of the libertarian cause and make people pay more than lip service to it if they want their votes. They would probably put some people in the house and maybe a couple in the Senate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WillFarnaby](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/willfarnaby/32/514_2.png) [@WillFarnaby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WillFarnaby)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 1:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/49 "2012-12-11T01:13:13Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> The libertarians need to realize that they’ve all reported for duty. There’s no hidden base of libertarian supporters out there waiting for the call. Every libertarian in America voted for Ron Paul in 2012 and he lost decisively. The libertarians have to swallow this result and accept that they are never going to elect a President.

Firstly, the libertarians elected Grover Cleveland on two seperate occasions.

Secondly, I never cast a vote for Ron Paul this year. That makes 2/2 libertarians who didn’t vote for Paul who posted in this thread.

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Definitely an overstatement-- I’m sure at least some of them instead voted for someone who was at least slightly libertarian. Ron Paul is not and never has been a libertarian-- He’s just a hard-right conservative who happens to like pot.

I guess you could point out at least three policy positions Paul holds that aren’t libertarian?

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> Ya think? In 1912, the American Socialist Party had pretty much peaked as a political party. It did have some influence later, during the New Deal, when FDR co-opted some of the Socialists’ platform – but the Libertarians have already gotten as much co-optation as they’re likely to get.

Uhh I’d say socialists of 1912 would be pretty happy wih the influence they had on American politics over the last 100 years.

Your last sentence is pure speculation. Socialism was a decades long movement before it had influence in mainstream politics. Paul’s brand, or should I say Murray Rothbard’s brand, of libertarianism is just gaining a foothold. You could be right, but it’s too soon to tell.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 1:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/50 "2012-12-11T01:33:35Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I guess you could point out at least three policy positions Paul holds that aren’t libertarian?

Well, let’s see, his idea that the government take over the precious metals market is rather the opposite of libertarianism, as is his policy of closed borders. And his racism has no place in a libertarian philosophy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 2:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/51 "2012-12-11T02:03:42Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> And his racism has no place in a libertarian philosophy.

Racism has long been associated with libertarianism. And it frankly fits quite well with their insistence that some kind or “survival of the fittest” society is desirable; if they admit that people can be ground down through no fault of their own and not by the government, they drastically weaken their case for the intervention of government in society being unnecessary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WillFarnaby](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/willfarnaby/32/514_2.png) [@WillFarnaby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WillFarnaby)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 3:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/52 "2012-12-11T03:01:11Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Well, let’s see, his idea that the government take over the precious metals market is rather the opposite of libertarianism, as is his policy of closed borders. And his racism has no place in a libertarian philosophy.

He isn’t racist and you have no proof that he is. This has been discussed ad nauseam. Even if he was, his policy positions (what I asked for, not his alleged racial biases) aren’t racist.

Closed borders? You’re going to have to be more specific than that. He is in favor of legal immigration and against any type of incentive of illegal immigration. He vote for the Secure Fence Act because he was against amnesty, but he says he doesn’t want the border secured by “fences and guns”. What he is against is welfare as a magnet for illegal immigration.

He is also against national ID cards and against forcing employers to verify the legal status of their employees. These policies would be supported by a hard right Republican but not a libertarian.

I hope the bit about takin over the precious metals market is just hyperbole. Of course his actual position is completely in line with libertarianism. He supports legalizing competing currencies which would [end](http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul#section_1) the government monopoly on money creation.

> [@](#):
>
> Paul supports legalization of parallel currencies, such as gold-backed notes issued from private markets and digital gold currencies.[66] He would like gold-backed notes (or other types of hard money) and digital gold currencies[67] to compete on a level playing field with Federal Reserve Notes, allowing individuals a choice whether to use sound money or to continue using fiat money

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WillFarnaby](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/willfarnaby/32/514_2.png) [@WillFarnaby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WillFarnaby)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 3:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/53 "2012-12-11T03:03:16Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> Racism has long been associated with libertarianism. And it frankly fits quite well with their insistence that some kind or “survival of the fittest” society is desirable; if they admit that people can be ground down through no fault of their own and not by the government, they drastically weaken their case for the intervention of government in society being unnecessary.

Yes since the days of the abolitionist Lysander Spooner, libertarians have been enthusiastic racists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 3:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/54 "2012-12-11T03:26:55Z")

</div>

> [@Titanium\_Dragon](#):
>
> The trouble is that the libertarians really are idiots if they vote Republican. They really should form their own party . . .

Wait, why shouldn’t they just join the LP?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 3:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/55 "2012-12-11T03:42:03Z")

</div>

> [@WillFarnaby](#):
>
> What he is against is welfare as a magnet for illegal immigration.

We’re talking about guys who get in debt to coyotes or cross the desert on foot for a chance to hang out in a Home Depot parking lot and hope for odd construction or landscaping jobs. I very much doubt they were thinking of American welfare when they decided to come here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![njtt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ecd19e/32.png) [@njtt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/njtt)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 4:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/56 "2012-12-11T04:02:52Z")

</div>

> [@WillFarnaby](#):
>
> Uhh I’d say socialists of 1912 would be pretty happy wih the influence they had on American politics over the last 100 years.

As America is about the least socialistic country in the world, that seems very unlikely.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 4:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/57 "2012-12-11T04:10:01Z")

</div>

> [@WillFarnaby](#):
>
> Firstly, the libertarians elected Grover Cleveland on two seperate occasions.

You guys are too modest. You should also be taking credit for electing Lincoln and Washington, writing the Declaration of Independence, winning both world wars, inventing the telephone and airplane, and curing smallpox.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 4:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/58 "2012-12-11T04:18:04Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> He isn’t racist and you have no proof that he is.

Other than all of the horribly racist trash he published under his own name.

> [@](#):
>
> Closed borders? You’re going to have to be more specific than that. He is in favor of legal immigration and against any type of incentive of illegal immigration.

How can immigration be illegal, from a libertarian point of view? Freedom means freedom.

> [@](#):
>
> I hope the bit about takin over the precious metals market is just hyperbole. Of course his actual position is completely in line with libertarianism. He supports legalizing competing currencies which would end the government monopoly on money creation.

Competing currencies are already perfectly legal, and there are plenty of them. What he wants to do is make it so the government mandates by fiat the price of gold. Which looks an awful lot like a government takeover of a market, to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 5:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/59 "2012-12-11T05:32:51Z")

</div>

> [@dropzone](#):
>
> Nope. Debs got 6% in 1912 and Johnson got only 1%.

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> Ya think? In 1912, the American Socialist Party had pretty much peaked as a political party. It did have some influence later, during the New Deal, when FDR co-opted some of the Socialists’ platform – but the Libertarians have already gotten as much co-optation as they’re likely to get.

I wasn’t aiming for an exact parallel-by point was that Libertarianism like Socialism is a growing movement that is for now outside the political mainstream. And considering there are Libertarian positions that are growing in popularity such as marijuana legalization, opposition to gun control, and across the board cuts (to both entitlement and military spending), what I was saying is that Libertarians need to as a movement moderate much as the Socialists did in countries like Britain or Germany to gain electoral strength-in America they did not which along with FDR’s New Deal and Wilson’s suppression of the Socialists meant they never became a major party.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [December 11, 2012, 5:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528/60 "2012-12-11T05:46:44Z")

</div>

> [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](#):
>
> I wasn’t aiming for an exact parallel-by point was that Libertarianism like Socialism is a growing movement that is for now outside the political mainstream. And considering there are Libertarian positions that are growing in popularity such as marijuana legalization, opposition to gun control, and across the board cuts (to both entitlement and military spending), what I was saying is that Libertarians need to as a movement moderate much as the Socialists did in countries like Britain or Germany to gain electoral strength-in America they did not which along with FDR’s New Deal and Wilson’s suppression of the Socialists meant they never became a major party.

OK, so which agencies should we use to suppress the Libertarians?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/liberty-movement-ron-paul-followers-asserts-that-its-in-the-conservative-drivers-seat/643528.md?page=4)
