Perhaps you should look up the definition of “feigning” in the dictionary.
Coming from someone who is disappointed that “Qaddaffi’s bitch” walked away from the bombing of a residential area, I shall give your criticism of Commisar all the consideration it deserves.
You’re no different from him, you’re merely on an opposing side.
Perhaps you should look up the various meanings of “you.” 
Since you likely need that explained: I’ve said before that English is unwieldy in that it, unlike Russian and many other languages, it uses the same word to refer to both the singular and the plural “you.”
In the statement that you’re referring to, I used the word “you” in the plural sense: i.e. “you Libyan rebels and rebel sympathizers as a group.” Obviously, I did not use it to refer to Bibliovore alone. That is an absurd interpretation, given that I specifically said “You called the attack dogs on your own people,” and there is no indication that this poster was in any position to do anything like that in his individual capacity.
In conclusion: I stand by my statement, which is not in any way an unwarranted accusation against Bibliovore as a person, but is, in my opinion, a warranted accusation against the people that he has chosen to represent on these boards.
Geez, get over it already.
Why? I’ve seen no withdrawal from you of your statement that you wish Qaddaffi’s wife had been killed along with his (and presumably her) son and grandchildren in the bombing of a residential area. Said bombing being part of a campaign to protect civilians.
Actually, she does seem to be a bitch. Despite her, ahem, loyal subjects living with massive unemployment and health care so poor that its citizens need to travel to other countries, among other problems, she’s living quite well:
[
](http://www.asianage.com/international/libyas-first-lady-owns-airline-company-20-tonnes-gold-910)
My exact statement above was that a certain BBC reporter “can’t imagine how anyone could ‘walk away unscathed’ like the Libyan government claims Ka-Daffy and his bitch did.” If you want to twist that into “I wish Ka-Daffy’s bitch had been killed,” well that’s up to you.
And earlier I posted “Oops! (For the grandchildren, not the bastard son.)”, which I meant as regret that the children, assuming they were children, were killed.
And that’s my final word on it. I’m done discussing this with you.
“Kaddaffi’s bitch” comes from you, not the BBC. As regards his son, he recently returned from Germany and played no role in the regime. As regards his grandchildren, “Oops.” “Oops?”
Yes, we’re definitely protecting civilians.
Wait a minute there… What exactly do you mean by the statement that I took the liberty of bolding? Are you really saying that you feel sorry for the innocent people killed by the bombing, but only if they were minors when they died? That’s certainly what it looks like.
If my reading is correct, how do you justify such a bizarre position? Do innocent people somehow forfeit their innocence upon reaching the age of majority? Assuming that you are an adult under the relevant laws of your current jurisdiction, is it now perfectly acceptable to kill you for something that you didn’t do?
BBC TV is reporting at least five waves of Nato air strikes – so far – on Tripoli overnight, including heavy bombing of Ka-Daffy’s compound. This after reports of Libyan aerial bombings of Misrata over the weekend.
It was in the news yesterday that Italy said it would arm the rebels.
Something is happening in Tripoli. Reports that a local air base, the Mitiga Air Base, has had the Independent flag raised. It might be the “Mohamed Elmgariaf Brigade in Tripoli” that is doing it. Details sketchy.
I keep googling for news on this but can’t seem to find anything not Twitter-originated; what I find says what you say there.
Googling on “Mohamed Elmgariaf” brings up nothing more . . . However, it appears Muhammad Yusuf al-Magariaf was the founder (in 1981) of the National Front for the Salvation of Libya.
In any case, Mitiga is a commercial airport, not an “airbase.” Using that word makes it sound like Gaddafi’s Air Force is defecting. (Unless there is more than one Mitiga airport – one civilian, one military? It’s not clear.)
International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrant for Gaddafi within the month. The Italian Foreign Minister who made the announcement stressed that this effectively rules out the possibility that he can go into exile free. So if there ever any was any hope of prizing him out without a fight to the finish, I guess it’s gone now.
Nato says it’s made 6000 strikes in Libya so far.
Say . . . Come to think of it . . . This means we really don’t need any casus belli or declaration of war, do we? Following the Noriega precedent, we can legitimately send an army into Libya just to arrest Gaddafi! 
Or . . . Well, we, the U.S., can’t (unless some U.S. court also issues a warrant). But any country that is signatory to the ICC Treaty could.
I wonder what that actually means though. 6,000 missiles fired? 6,000 targets destroyed? 6,000 separate missions?