# Lie down vs. lay down, and why my head may explode

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [August 14, 2025, 8:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025 "2025-08-14T08:05:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zoobi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/13edae/32.png) [@Zoobi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zoobi)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2025, 5:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/41 "2025-08-14T17:05:55Z")

</div>

Yeah but people aren’t computing machines so sorry I’ll stick with human language and its logical “flaws”. I suspect my side will prevail, but you can still enjoy your superior logic and intelligence without us.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sylvanz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/fbc32d/32.png) [@Sylvanz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sylvanz)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2025, 5:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/42 "2025-08-14T17:18:58Z")

</div>

One of my pet peeve is less/fewer. It _sounds wrong_. However, I know it appears to be an inevitable change in the making.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johanna](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johanna/32/8318_2.png) [@Johanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johanna)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2025, 5:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/43 "2025-08-14T17:36:10Z")

</div>

The lie/lay distinction goes clear back to Proto-Indo-European. It derives from a particle suffixed to a verb to give it **causative** meaning. In modern English the effect of the now-disappeared particle is to change the vowel sound—meaningfully.

Other base verbs and the causative derived from them. In each case you can see the change made to the word by the particle that used to be added there.

cling — clench

drink — drench

fall — fell

reck — reach

rise — raise

sere — sear

sit — set

stay — stow

stink — stench

wring — wrench

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beckdawrek](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/beckdawrek/32/3647_2.png) [@Beckdawrek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beckdawrek)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2025, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/44 "2025-08-14T18:27:56Z")

</div>

I like the,

fit/fought connection.

You know there’s like 10 threads on lie/lay. I may have started one. Can’t quite remember. Sure I’ve discussed it here at some time.

I hate to tell someone “I laid down awhile” if I napped, so I say instead “I had a lie down”.

English language is so weird, no lie. 😊

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2025, 6:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/45 "2025-08-14T18:35:37Z")

</div>

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> This is how language changes – according to some, how it “evolves”, and according to others, how it deteriorates and becomes less logical and less consistent (although I’m fairly sure some of us literally could care less 😉 ).

By George, I think he’s got it! (Or is it gotten it? Aaaaarrrggghhh!)

English is full of verbs that carry more than one spelling or that once had distinct meanings that have vanished. Shall and will used to be such bugaboos to pedants but that distinction has been nearly totally lost in modern American discourse. (Same with who and whom, though not verbs.) Hang and hung was mentioned above. Burned can be both transitive and intransitive but burnt is an adjective. Yet meaned is not a standard past tense but meant is.

Whole books have been built on these historic oddities, some of them objective studies, some advising or prescribing some forms over others. Two trends throughout English history have been dominant: 1) simplification and pruning of nuances than seem unnecessary and 2) adding meanings onto familiar words so that they can be repurposed, like text.

These trends appear to be contradictory and sometimes are. Yet if they are quickly adopted widespread through a range of groups they must have been useful, even necessary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2025, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/46 "2025-08-14T21:10:37Z")

</div>

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> Put another way, try applying your maxim “If everyone is getting it wrong, they’re not” to computer code. Then it becomes “If everyone is getting it wrong, none of their programs work”. You cannot, for instance, arbitrarily drop a logical negation like “.NOT.” and expect the statement to have exactly the same meaning as before.

I wouldn’t expect to.

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> The reality is that human language really is a similar type of encoding, except that our organic brains are conditioned to make fuzzy-logic context-sensitive interpretations.

It’s similar, except that it’s not really all that similar. Computer languages are tools that are designed with a strict intent and purpose; they have more in common with a box of tools or Lego than they do with human language.  
Human language is a system that created itself - it has more in common with DNA than it does with computer code.

The resemblance between human language and computer code is superficial.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kent\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kent_clark/32/105_2.png) [@Kent\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kent_Clark)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 1:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/47 "2025-08-15T01:35:26Z")

</div>

> [@RivkahChaya](#):
>
> What’s up with this? why is this error so common, it is more common than the correct form?

Because no one ever wrote an anthem called “Lie Down”

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/O7M3iPE6PzY/maxresdefault.jpg "LAY DOWN (song only) LIVE '70 Melanie & The Edwin Hawkins Singers (Candles In The Rain)") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7M3iPE6PzY)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 2:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/48 "2025-08-15T02:18:23Z")

</div>

> [@wolfpup](#):
>
> although I’m fairly sure some of us literally could care less 😉 )

I kinda _like_ “I could care less.” It makes me imagine that, yes, you probably _could_, but that would involve more effort than you’re interested in exerting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 2:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/49 "2025-08-15T02:29:02Z")

</div>

> [@ZonexandScout](#):
>
> I get a headache, too, when I try to explain the proper use of “swim,” “swam,” and “swum.” Nobody seems to use these correctly.

And when it happens, do you have to go lie down?

> [@Elmer\_J.Fudd](#):
>
> Strangely, I only misuse the word when I tell a dog to “Lay down!”. I wonder how many pets would actually understand a command to “Lie down!”.

If you ever have one correct you and refuse to assume a supine position until you use “lie down,” keep that pet; you’ve got a gold mine on your hands!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZonexandScout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zonexandscout/32/544_2.png) [@ZonexandScout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZonexandScout)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 2:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/50 "2025-08-15T02:32:53Z")

</div>

Yes, I have had to have lum down (see “lay, lie, lum” and “drig, drag, drug”).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 10:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/51 "2025-08-15T10:50:31Z")

</div>

> [@Kent\_Clark](#):
>
> Because no one ever wrote an anthem called “Lie Down”

The closest I can think of:

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/XJ-_6lv9kgY/maxresdefault.jpg "Lie Down in the Grass") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ-_6lv9kgY)

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/SN1WYf5Ihjg/maxresdefault.jpg "You Lie Down with Dogs") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SN1WYf5Ihjg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 11:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/52 "2025-08-15T11:16:07Z")

</div>

Applying standards from machine language to human language is like applying emoji standards to your face.

Sure, the emoji is much more perfect: solid color, simple lines, perfect arcs, compared to the pores and hairs and freckles and wrinkles on your own face. Human faces are weird and complex and very difficult to describe with geometric terms. But it’s insane to treat the emoji as if it’s better, or to chastise a human face for being wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 11:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/53 "2025-08-15T11:45:18Z")

</div>

Do not want to sidetrack the original discussion too far, but I wonder how many people would say that something “heats up” versus “hots up”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PatrickLondon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/patricklondon/32/4422_2.png) [@PatrickLondon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PatrickLondon)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 11:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/54 "2025-08-15T11:53:25Z")

</div>

> [@peedin](#):
>
> Lay has an object

Except when it’s the past tense of “lie”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mean_mr.mustard/32/3865_2.png) [@Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mean_Mr.Mustard)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 12:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/55 "2025-08-15T12:12:07Z")

</div>

> [@Beckdawrek](#):
>
> Well, Dylan got it wrong..I guess.
> 
> Lay, Lady, lay

As long as she’s not eating Lies potato chips in my big brass bed.

mmm

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thorny\_locust](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thorny_locust/32/431_2.png) [@thorny\_locust](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thorny_locust)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 12:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/56 "2025-08-15T12:25:36Z")

</div>

> [@Kent\_Clark](#):
>
> Because no one ever wrote an anthem called “Lie Down”

“Lay down, lay down, lay it all down.” “Lay it all down” is technically correct. The “lay down” portion is either a poetic twist on the phrase or just a shortening of it.

From the rest of the description in the song of the scene, there wouldn’t have been room to lie down.

[/end nitpick]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SCAdian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/scadian/32/3292_2.png) [@SCAdian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SCAdian)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 12:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/57 "2025-08-15T12:39:49Z")

</div>

> [@ZonexandScout](#):
>
> I get a headache, too, when I try t "o explain the proper use of “swim,” “swam,” and “swum.” Nobody seems to use these correctly.

Ditto “sink”, “sank” and “sunk”. Or “drink”, “drank” and “drunk”. Or “sing”, “sang” and “sung”.

There’s just somethin about the _i_-_a_-_u_ progression that people seem to dislike. On the other hand, though, I used to work with a guy who said “bring”, “brang” and “brung”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrAtoz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@MrAtoz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrAtoz)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 12:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/58 "2025-08-15T12:59:03Z")

</div>

> [@SCAdian](#):
>
> Ditto “sink”, “sank” and “sunk”

I was going to mention that “sank” seems to be vanishing. It’s becoming more common, at least in my experience, to hear things like “The ship sunk off the coast of California.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 1:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/59 "2025-08-15T13:04:41Z")

</div>

Interesting analogy and I agree. It’s tempting to think of them as similar things but they really only overlap a little.

In the case of computer vs human languages, the more you really look, the less similar they are - computer languages have no grammatical tense, for example.

Really, high level computer languages are just a collection of convenient, human-friendly labels for what are ultimately mathematical operations.

It’s perfectly OK to prefer maths and logic over language and writing, but it’s folly to expect them to behave the same.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2025, 2:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025/60 "2025-08-15T14:02:43Z")

</div>

> [@Mangetout](#):
>
> Really, high level computer languages are just a collection of convenient, human-friendly labels for what are ultimately mathematical operations.

There’s a lot of potential philosophy in what the “ultimate” means. In electronic computers, it’s energy states of transistors. And then we humans pile layers of interpretations on top of those states. A mathematical interpretation is often useful, but it’s by no means always useful.

But more to the topic of this thread, computer languages are dual use. The obvious one is how they cause the computer to change states. The other use is communication to _other humans_. Computer coding is often a group activity and coders communicate to each other via computer language what the instructions are. And just like a musical score or an engineering drawing is a formalized way for humans to communicate to each other, so is computer code.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lie-down-vs-lay-down-and-why-my-head-may-explode/1022025.md?page=4)
