Limited omniscience or limited omnipotence?

[Quartz]

@Frylock

It says some of the things you “know” might be false. So it looks as though what it’s really talking about is belief, not knowledge. The power described is the “power” to have every belief that has ever been had.

I obviously phrased it badly. It’s not belief at all but current human knowledge. Let’s take an example. If we were back in the 1800s, we would ‘know’ that v=u+at and the other Newtonian equations. So you’d be limited by that. Fast forward to Einstein and we now know that E=MC2, so you’re limited by that.

[Sofis]

@horsetech

Well, to date no human has regenerated hands or given birth as a phenotypic male, so, no, neither of those would be allowed.

But then there are things some people can do that I cannot, which means I am not omnipotent in the manner described.

[Autolycus]

Partial omniscience without the power to affect changes based on this knowledge sounds like a kind of hell to me. My pick is obvious.